News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinecabal-elitecorporatewalmart — Viewing Item


Los angeles fights walmart to protect jobs { April 2 2004 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-walmart2apr02,1,2689340.story?coll=la-home-headlines

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-walmart2apr02,1,2689340.story?coll=la-home-headlines

THE STATE
Wal-Mart vs. Inglewood a Warm-Up for L.A. Fight
Tuesday's balloting will hold lessons for a battle pitting the mega-retailer against the megalopolis.
By Jessica Garrison and Sara Lin
Times Staff Writers

April 2, 2004

With Inglewood voters set to decide Tuesday whether Wal-Mart can build a Supercenter in town, the battle over the chain's expansion throughout California may soon shift to Los Angeles, where officials are laying plans to effectively ban the megastores in much of the nation's second-largest city.

From Calexico to Contra Costa County, the retail giant has successfully fought efforts to keep out the centers, which combine the trappings of a normal Wal-Mart with aisles of groceries.

But in Inglewood, Wal-Mart has employed a new strategy.

The world's largest company has put an initiative on the ballot that would sideline local officials and allow the development without the usual traffic studies, environmental reviews and public hearings.

"The stakes in Inglewood are the highest they have ever been anywhere," said Madeline Janis-Aparicio, executive director of the Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy, a community organization that is trying to rally residents against the initiative. "They want to throw out all the local planning laws and make themselves a little Wal-Mart city."

In Inglewood, Los Angeles and elsewhere, many labor and community groups are opposed to the nonunion Wal-Mart stores because they say they depress wages, drive out existing businesses, create traffic problems and actually reduce the total number of jobs in the surrounding area.

Wal-Mart officials say they are only trying to give consumers what they want: low prices, jobs for young people and sales tax revenue for cash-strapped cities.

"It's important that Inglewood consumers have the same shopping that many of the neighboring communities have had for years," said Wal-Mart spokesman Peter Kanelos. "Wal-Mart and our customers are tired of being bullied by the unions. If the unions and the local politicians they put in office want to attack Wal-Mart, they can rest assured that we'll fight back."

In the city of Los Angeles, where officials are putting the finishing touches on an ordinance that would effectively prohibit the Supercenters in much of the city limits, political and labor leaders say they are watching Inglewood closely for clues to the kind of fight the company may wage against them.

Councilmen Eric Garcetti and Ed Reyes introduced a motion more than a year ago that would prohibit stores with more than 100,000 square feet that devote more than 10% of their inventory to nontaxable food and drugs in areas of the city designated as economic assistance zones, which cover about 60% of the city. A Supercenter can run 200,000 square feet.

The proposal still must go before the city's Planning Commission and the City Council could vote on it as soon as this summer. Mayor James K. Hahn has said he supports the idea, as does City Atty. Rocky Delgadillo.

Garcetti said the ordinance is necessary to "maintain small businesses and protect decent-paying jobs."

"We've seen the record of the Supercenters throughout this country in shutting down main streets … and in replacing good-paying jobs with poverty-level jobs that take billions out of the local economy," he said.

But some local leaders take issue with blanket prohibitions against Wal-Mart Supercenters.

Los Angeles City Councilman Bernard C. Parks has opposed Garcetti's and Reyes' proposed ban. A traditional Wal-Mart store opened in his district last year in Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza, and has proven to be tremendously popular, Parks said. "Certain communities like the 8th District … should not be restricted from having access to those willing to come in to the community," Parks said.

Ever since Wal-Mart announced plans to build 40 Supercenters throughout California, their impending arrival has triggered changes in the grocery industry and sparked skirmishes between the company and organized labor and their allies.

The specter of the Supercenters fueled the longest supermarket strike in Southern California history last fall and winter. About 70,000 grocery workers, who earn an average of $19 an hour, walked picket lines for 4 1/2 months to protest proposed reductions in health benefits that the supermarkets said they needed to hold their own against Wal-Mart. The strike was settled in February with a two-tier system under which the stores will pay new hires less in wages and benefits than veteran workers.

With the strike over, organized labor, including the United Food and Commercial Workers union, which represents grocery workers, has turned its attention to mobilizing local communities to keep the Supercenters out.

In some communities, such as Bakersfield and Hemet, residents, often backed by union money, have sued to block construction. In others, such as Oakland and Turlock, city and county leaders have enacted laws that would prohibit them.

Wal-Mart has been fighting them every step of the way — and has not yet lost a Supercenter battle. In Calexico and Contra Costa County, for example, the company has persuaded voters to repeal prohibitions against Supercenters. In other instances, the retailer has filed lawsuits against cities.

Wal-Mart is using a new strategy in Inglewood. Instead of launching a campaign to repeal an ordinance, the company is pushing for a more sweeping initiative that would allow construction of a shopping center the size of 17 football fields without normal city input. It would be built on an empty lot between the Hollywood Park racetrack and the Forum.

Inglewood officials and Wal-Mart have been tussling over the development, which could include a Supercenter, for more than a year. The first volley came in October 2002, when the Inglewood City Council adopted an emergency ordinance to prevent construction of retail stores larger than 155,000 square feet that sell more than 20,000 nontaxable items, such as food and drugs.

Within a month, Wal-Mart had enough petitions to force a public vote on the ordinance. At the same time, the company threatened to sue the city for alleged procedural violations.

Inglewood officials backed down, rescinding their Supercenter ban. Outraged at the retreat, the United Food and Commercial Workers union successfully backed its own candidate for City Council. Faced with the possibility that the new council would revive attempts to block its plans, Wal-Mart backed a group called "Citizens Committee to Welcome Wal-Mart to Inglewood" and quickly gathered a new batch of signatures for an initiative.

Both sides are pushing hard in the working-class town, which is roughly split between African Americans and Latinos. Wal-Mart has spent more than $1 million on an election in which fewer than 10,000 people are expected to vote. The company has flooded the city with television commercials and mailers depicting happy African American families and calling the development "good news for everyone in Inglewood."

Other fliers trumpet the project as a boon for Inglewood youths who need entry-level jobs and say that $3 million to $5 million in new sales tax revenue could boost the police force and "fix up our streets and sidewalks."

Mayor Roosevelt F. Dorn, who says the Wal-Mart development would create 2,000 construction jobs and more than 1,000 permanent jobs for residents, is the only Inglewood elected official who has endorsed Measure 04-A.

The other side, meanwhile, is trying to make the point that the development would not only hurt Inglewood's established businesses and bring in the wrong kind of jobs, but would set a dangerous precedent.

"Beyond the question of do you like Wal-Mart or not, the real issue is, is it appropriate for them to bully their way into the city and not comply with local laws … state environmental law … and public input into the process," said Assemblyman Jerome Horton (D-Inglewood).

A broad spectrum of community leaders have come out against the initiative, including city, county and state officials, clergy from the Nation of Islam, the Catholic Church and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

But they acknowledge that they are facing an uphill fight — especially because they have far less money. The Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy has spent less than $20,000, and the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor-Backed Voter Improvement Project has budgeted $125,000 for the fight.

"We just don't have the kind of funds to be on television like they are," said Miguel Contreras, the labor federation's executive secretary and treasurer. "We'll be outspent 10 to 1."

Still, California is giving Wal-Mart a run for its money. "The political obstacles set up by our competitors and the unions have made it a challenge," said Robert McAdam, the company's vice president for state and local government relations.

Harley Shaiken, a professor of geography at UC Berkeley who studies labor and the political economy, said the retailer's victories may be coming at a price here. "Wal-Mart is winning," he said. "But it is a costly victory. It's expensive in dollar terms … but it is also expensive in image terms. No retailer wants to be constantly fighting a battle about its image in the community."

But labor leader Contreras predicts an intense fight in Los Angeles. "We'll do the battle royale in Los Angeles," he said. "This will be a battleground, a national battleground."




Activist takes million from walmart for mlk memorial { March 24 2006 }
Americans say walmart is bad for america
Canadian store near union contract will be closed by walmart
Class action sex discrimination lawsuit against walmart
Council sellsout black chicago community to walmart { April 21 2004 }
Ehrlich urged to return walmart money { May 4 2005 }
Empire of bargains remakes working world { November 23 2003 }
Executives knew walmart employees were illegals { November 8 2005 }
Foes dig in as walmart aims for new york city { February 10 2005 }
Germanys walmart goes for world conquest { April 26 2004 }
Gocery store windixie dies out to wal mart
Grocers treat employees like walmart employees
Grocery unions battle to stop invasion of giant stores { November 25 2003 }
Hacktivists piss off walmart
Heir john walton dies in plane crash
How costco became the anti walmart
India protests western style stores like walmart
La voters suburb reject wal mart supercenter
Legislature proposes special tax on walmart
Lobbyists hired by walmart to topped benefits bill { November 18 2005 }
Los angeles council hampers walmart plans
Los angeles fights walmart to protect jobs { April 2 2004 }
Los angeles voters send wal mart packing { April 7 2004 }
Maryland forces healthcare for walmart employees
Mexicans protest walmart near ruins
New pyramid mexican walmart threatens ancient treasures { November 5 2004 }
No walmart in chicago [jpg]
Pelosi says wal mart arrests terrorizing
Protesters bash wal mart attempts in two cities { May 2 2004 }
Scouring the globe to give shoppers 8d polo shirt { November 24 2003 }
Stymied by politicians walmart turns to losangeles voters { April 5 2004 }
Teens charged with bombing walmart in maine
Two walmart stores in quebec receive bomb threat { February 11 2005 }
Virginia town joins against walmart
Wal mart economic disease
Wal mart facing rising resistance { May 4 2004 }
Wal mart interested in acquisitions in brazil { August 25 2004 }
Wal mart invates mexico and mexico gladly surrenders { December 6 2003 }
Wal mart raids 300 illegal workers
Wal mart screws labor force { November 6 2003 }
Wal mart threat fuelds new urban politics { May 20 2004 }
Wal mart violated labor laws { January 13 2004 }
Wal marts benefits come under fire
Walmart bank threatens financial system says lawmakers
Walmart bank { January 7 2003 }
Walmart buys brazil supermarket chain
Walmart CEO goes offensive on critics
Walmart china inventory hits 18b this year
Walmart costs state taxpayers for workers { August 3 2004 }
Walmart customers overcharge problems { April 3 2004 }
Walmart cuts prices ahead of holidays to boost sales { November 21 2006 }
Walmart dependent on welfare for employees { November 7 2003 }
Walmart economy was keeping down inflation
Walmart forces jobs overseas
Walmart ge morgan banking system { May 23 2003 }
Walmart gets bigger
Walmart in offensive to boost image { September 8 2004 }
Walmart in queens scrapped due to protest
Walmart involved in congressional black caucus fundraiser { May 15 2005 }
Walmart locked janitors in stores
Walmart nation race to the bottom { February 18 2004 }
Walmart on fire [jpg]
Walmart operates intelligence spying network
Walmart pays ceo more and employees less than costco
Walmart recommends king for planet of the apes
Walmart reopens after arson fires { December 24 2004 }
Walmart threatens to double china outlets by 2006
Walmart to begin phased rfid tag
Walmart to use more partimers cheaper labor
Walmart uses extreme tactics to stop unions { May 2 2007 }
Walmart violates clean water act { May 12 2004 }
Walmart violates labor laws to stop unions { May 1 2007 }
Walmart wins warnings on future investigations { February 12 2005 }
Walmart
Walmarts wants stores throughout europe { May 24 2004 }
Winndixie cuts 326 to compete with walmart
Workers from indonesia nicaragua etc sue walmart
Zoning rules block kansas walmart supercenter

Files Listed: 78



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple