NewsMine — 9-11 — questions — Viewing Item

In 1998 zelikow predicted and planned for 911 Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/visions/publication/terrorism.htm "such an event would divide our past and future into a 'before' and 'after.' " http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/visions/publication/terrorism.htm Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy By Ashton B. Carter, John M. Deutch and Philip D. Zelikow A Report of Visions of Governance for the Twenty-First Century A Project of the John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University ©1998 by the Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University and the Board of Trustees of Harvard University An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America’s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and the use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either as other terrorists seek to imitate this great "success" or as the United States strikes out at those considered responsible. Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into a "before" and "after." The effort and resources we devote to averting or containing this threat now, in the "before" period, will seem woeful, even pathetic, when compared to what will happen "after." Our leaders will be judged negligent for not addressing catastrophic terrorism more urgently.

bush-on-911 charlie-sheen citizens-question flight-77-no-arabs insider-job israelis jersey-widows planted-weapons remote-flying scholars stocks-trades vreeland 25 inconsistencies 9 11 facts 9 11 truth movement picks up in 2004 { February 21 2006 } 9 reports 911 myths coverups { October 20 2001 } Abc docudrama blames clinton for bin laden failures { September 7 2006 } Accuracy questioned anti terror efforts Arizona creates contraversial 911 memorial { December 16 2006 } Assassination too complex for intelligence to not know { October 20 2005 } Bill clinton tells heckler 911 not inside job Blind eye springman ins { November 6 2001 } Coincidental 911 excercise Coverup and conspiracy Enron and 911 { May 31 2002 } Fbi admits no evidence Fbi oklahoma 911 Fbi stole 911 flight controller black boxes { December 19 2005 } Fbi whistle blower backed for terror committee Ghost riders in the sky { December 5 2002 } Graham blames nations { December 11 2002 } Hijacked jets almost collided Homeland sec before 911 { January 31 2001 } In 1998 zelikow predicted and planned for 911 Indications add up to government conspiracy { September 8 2006 } Israeli daniel lewin shot on AA11 { September 15 2001 } Missed offers for binladen Mohamed atta terrorist emails Muhammad claims ashcroft inolved in 911 attacks { April 29 2006 } New york mag ground zero grassy knoll Npr covers 911 conspiracies { August 9 2006 } Npr show guest says 911 truth linked to terrorism { July 10 2006 } Pipeline atta Points to 911 inside job Senator leahy asks why bush let 911 happen { September 29 2006 } Sf mayor warned 911 Television show depicts 911 as bush plot Trade Center warning baffles police [htm] Trade center warnings turn out true War pre planned { September 18 2001 } Who knew 911 { May 16 2002 } Zbigniew brzezinski and 911 { December 23 2001 } Files Listed: 41

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.