News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page
NewsMine 9-11 questions Viewing Item | 9 11 facts > >URGE THEM TO WIDEN THE CONGRESSIONAL INQUIRY AROUND 9-11 AND HOW IT WAS > >ALLOWED TO HAPPEN. PEOPLE NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR "INACTION" OR > >"HALF-ACTION." > > > > > >SUPPORTING FACTS ALL SOURCED: > >Why are Bush & Cheney urging the Senate to "limit" inquiries into 9-11? > >Why > >should YOU demand that those inquiries be full and open to the public? > > > >What do we know of 9-11 that should be investigated? > > > >Pre 9-11 Intelligence Breakdowns: > >- Reportedly the Bush Administration forced the FBI to "back off" on their > >investigations of terrorism in the Middle East. FBI Deputy Director > >O'Neill > >(killed in WTC on 9-11) reportedly resigned not long before 9-11 over this > >investigative obstruction, claiming that the main obstruction was the > >interests of American Oil Companies. (Source: Recently released French > >Book, > >"Bin Laden, La Verite Interdite" (Bin Laden, the Forbidden Truth) > >- US Oil interests were well represented within the negotiating team, that > >apparently was the source of the threat to "bury Afghanistan in a carpet of > >bombs" unless they played ball in creating a major oil pipeline through > >Afghanistan. This threat was reportedly made several months before 9-11. > >(Bush's family has a strong oil background. So are some of his top aides. > >- U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney was until the end of last year president > >of > >o Halliburton a company that provides services for oil industry; > >- National Security Council Condoleeza Rice was between 1991 and 2000 > >manager for Chevron; > >- Ministers of Commerce and Energy, Donald Evans and Stanley Abraham worked > >for Tom Brown, another oil giant. > >[ BBC interview on the above issue: - The Bush Administration forced the > >FBI > >to back off of the Bin Laden investigation months before 9-11. [BBC > >transcript BUSH - BIN LADEN HIDDEN AGENDA!!!] > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/events/newsnight/newsid_1645000/1645527.st m] > > > >[and now --you knew it was coming, didn't you?-- Enron and 9-11:] > >"Is Enron Behind The War In Afghanistan?" From Robert Lederman 2-5-2 > >[collection of links to articles] > > ..."Enron ... conducted the feasibility study for a US$2.5 billion > >trans-Caspian gas pipeline which is being built under a joint venture > >agreement signed in February 1999 between Turkmenistan, Bechtel and General > >Electric Capital Services." > > ..."as the two star general Donald Kerrick told the Washington Post, > >reflecting on his service to both President Clinton and President Bush: > >Clinton's advisors met nearly weekly on how to stop bin Laden and al Qaeda. > >"I didn't detect that kind of focus" from the Bush Administration. > >http://www.rense.com/general19/lend.htm > >also http://www.indybay.org/news/2002/02/115642.php > > > > > >- CIA Station Chief in Dubai met with Bin Laden only 7 weeks before 9-11 > >took place, yet they did not try to apprehend him, only met with him. - > >The > >CIA station chief in Dubai met with Bin Laden 7 weeks before 9-11, and at a > >time when Bin Laden was supposedly "wanted" by the CIA. > >http://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html·(English) > >(German Trans.) http://www.orf.at/orfon/011031-44569/index.html > > > >- US government agent claims the CIA has been dealing with Bin Laden since > >1987, and he suggests in his interview that the terrorists acts of late may > >well have been planned and paid for by the CIA with US taxpayers money to > >enable the Bush Administration to "legitimately" bomb Afghanistan into > >submission. > > An interview with Michael Springman exposes the CIA's links > >with the terrorist attacks on September 11 > >[Michael Springmann worked for the US government for 20 years with the > >foreign service and consulate. He just went public with the story of his > >involvement in a large scale CIA operation that brought hundreds of people > >from the middle east to the US, issued them passports and trained them to > >be > >terrorists. > > Hear the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) interview here. > > http://www.straightgoods.ca/ViewNote.cfm?REF=1267] > > > >- Insider Trading profits off the 9-11 terror don't lead to Osama Bin > >Laden, > >but to AB Brown Trust, until recently chaired by the 3rd highest man in the > >CIA. > >- [Someone with considerable financial resources, and foreknowledge of the > >terrorist event, put stock options "against" the airlines that were to > >explode that week of 9-11. - INSIDER TRADING PROFITS off of 9-11 were > >frenzied over by the US media when they thought it was Arab terrorists . . > >. > >but then the story mysteriously died. Until, the UK Independent reveals > >that it leads to a firm chaired by the 3rd highest man in the CIA (and > >stranger still is that $2.5 million of the "winnings" are still unclaimed > >(see below for URL to entire story). > >http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RUP110A.html . Info confirmed by > >Independent Newspaper in UK: > >http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=99402] > > > > > >Is it Outrageous to Consider that Elements of a Nations' Government Could > >Committ Terror on It's Own People for Political Reasons? > > > >- ABC News.com's May/2001 story resurfaces about how the US Joint Chiefs of > >Staff have in the past ACTUALLY DESIGNED a plan to committ domestic terror > >on Americans to whip them into a war hysteria, to support war efforts by > >the > >govt. > >http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html > > > >[The National Security Archive has a PDF version of the Operation > >Northwoods > >plan, which author James Bamford says "may be the most corrupt plan ever > >created by the U.S. government." It can be found at the following URL:] > >http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/ > > > > > > > >After 9-11 Oddities: > > > >Anthrax sent to top Democrat Daschle and to the U.S. media (NBC & The > >National Inquirer) had the effect of "uniting the nation behind the Bush > >Administration's war effort," and literally shutting down Congress in many > >ways. > > > >Oddities exist when the anthrax issue is looked at closely: > >- New Science Journal says Anthrax sent to Daschle is NOT Russian or Iraqi, > >but likely US military strain. > > > >- San Francisco Chronicle reports, the anthrax strain produced in US > >University is destroyed on ok of FBI (they had studied this for years, some > >at university question the timing of the destruction of those anthrax > >spores > >. . . right now of all times (?)) > > > http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2001/11/09/MN 153227.DTL > > > >Terror Anthrax Linked to Type Made by U.S. > >The powder used in the anthrax attacks is virtually > >indistinguishable from that produced by the United States > >military, according to federal scientists. > >http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/03/national/03POWD.html?todaysheadlines > > > > > > > >After 9-11 Administration Damage Control Efforts: > > > >Fire Engineering Magazine assails the incredible speed that the evidence in > >the WTC collapse is being destroyed by Gullianne. Never in the history of > >fire investigations has evidence been destroyed this fast before exhausting > >investigations can be completed. ["We must try to find out why the twin > >towers fell" By James Quintiere, > >Baltimore Sun 1/3/01 > >http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.towers03jan03.story > >- WTC "INVESTIGATION"?: A CALL TO ACTION from Fire Engineering Magazine] > >- > >- Bush Admin. declares they will "seal the records of presidents beginning > >with Father Bush/Reagans (an act never before done in US presidential > >history)." > > > >- "It is not a stretch to wonder if this White House is up to something > >that > >it doesn't want known 12 years from now or anytime thereafter. [A direct > >quote from the piece carried by Scripps Howard News Service, 11/5/2001. > >Re: > >Bush's sealing of presidential records for the first time in U.S. history] > > > > > >- Bush & Cheney urge Senate Leader to "limit" inquiries into 9-11: Senate > >perplexed by this. > >Don't go there: Bush Asks Daschle to Limit Sept. 11 Probes > >Date: Wednesday, January 30 @ 10:09:24 EST > >WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush personally asked Senate Majority Leader > >Tom Daschle Tuesday to limit the congressional investigation into the > >events > >of September 11, congressional and White House sources told CNN. > >The request was made at a private meeting with congressional leaders > >Tuesday > >morning. Sources said Bush initiated the conversation. > >He asked that only the House and Senate intelligence committees look into > >the potential breakdowns among federal agencies that could have allowed the > >terrorist attacks to occur, rather than a broader inquiry that some > >lawmakers have proposed, the sources said. > >Tuesday's discussion followed a rare call to Daschle from Vice President > >Dick Cheney last Friday to make the same request. > >"The vice president expressed the concern that a review of what happened on > >September 11 would take resources and personnel away from the effort in the > >war on terrorism," Daschle told reporters. > >But, Daschle said, he has not agreed to limit the investigation. > >"I acknowledged that concern, and it is for that reason that the > >Intelligence Committee is going to begin this effort, trying to limit the > >scope and the overall review of what happened," said Daschle, D-South > >Dakota. > >"But clearly, I think the American people are entitled to know what > >happened > >and why," he said. > > > > > > > >Foreign Officials have powerful concerns over 9-11: > > > >FORMER GERMAN CABINET MINISTER ATTACKS OFFICIAL BRAINWASHING ON SEPTEMBER > >11 > >ISSUE > >[Source: Tagesspiegel, Berlin, Jan. 13] PARTIAL TRANSLATION > > > >In a full-page interview with the Sunday edition (Jan. 13) of the Berlin > >Tagesspiegel daily, former German Minister of Technology, Andreas von > >Buelow, said he does not buy any of the official theories that have been > >presented to date, on the events of September 11. > > > >Q: You seem so angry, really upset. > > > >Von Buelow: I can explain what's bothering me: I see that after the > >horrifying attacks of Sept. 11, all political public opinion is being > >forced > >into a direction that I consider wrong. > > > >Q: What do you mean by that? > > > >Von Buelow: I wonder why many questions are not asked. Normally, with such > >a > >terrible thing, various leads and tracks appear that are then commented on, > >by the investigators, the media, the government: Is there something here or > >not? Are the explanations plausible? This time, this is not the case at > >all. > >It already began just hours after the attacks in New York and Washington > >and-- > > > >Q: In those hours, there was horror, and grief. > > > >Von Buelow: Right, but actually it was astounding: There are 26 > >intelligence > >services in the U.S.A. with a budget of $30 billion-- > > > >Q: ...more than the German defense budget... > > > >Von Buelow: --which were not able to prevent the attacks. In fact, they > >didn't even have an inkling they would happen. For 60 decisive minutes, the > >military and intelligence agencies let the fighter planes stay on the > >ground, 48 hours later, however, the FBI presented a list of suicide > >attackers. Within ten days, it emerged that seven of them were still alive. > > > >Q: What, please? > > > >Von Buelow: Yes, yes. And why did the FBI chief take no position regarding > >contradictions? Where the list came from, why it was false?If I were the > >chief investigator (state attorney) in such a case, I would regularly go to > >the public, and give information on which leadsare valid and which not. > > > >Q: That sounds like-- > > > >Von Buelow: --like assailants who, in their preparations, leave tracks > >behind them like a herd of stampeding elephants? They made payments with > >credit cards with their own names; they reported to their flight > >instructors > >with their own names. They left behind rented cars with flight manuals in > >Arabic for jumbo jets. They took with them, on their suicide trip, wills > >and > >farewell letters, which fall into the hands of the FBI, because they were > >stored in the wrong place and wrongly addressed. Clues were left like > >behind > >like in a child's game of hide-and-seek, which were to be followed! > > > >There is also the theory of one British flight engineer: According to this, > >the steering of the planes was perhaps taken out ofthe pilots' hands, from > >outside. The Americans had developed a method in the 1970s, whereby they > >could rescue hijacked planes by intervening into the computer piloting > >[automatic pilot system]. This theory says, this technique was abusedin > >this > >case. That's a theory.... > > > >Q: Which sounds really adventurous, and was never considered. > > > >Von Buelow: You see! I do not accept this theory, but I find it worth > >considering. And what about the obscure stock transactions? In theweek > >prior > >to the attacks, the amount of transactions in stocks in American Airlines, > >United Airlines, and insurance companies, increased 1,200%. It was for a > >value of $15 billion. Some people must have known something. Who? > > > >Q: Why don't you speculate on who it might have been. > > > >Von Buelow: With the help of the horrifying attacks, the Western mass > >democracies were subjected to brainwashing. The enemy image of > >anti-communism doesn't work any more; it is to be replaced by peoples of > >Islamic belief. They are accused of having given birth to suicidal > >terrorism. > > > >Q: Brainwashing? That's a tough term. > > > >Von Buelow: Yes? But the idea of the enemy image doesn't come from me. It > >comes from Zbigniew Brzezinski and Samuel Huntington, two policy-makers of > >American intelligence and foreign policy. Already in the middle of he > >1990s, > >Huntingon believed, people in Europe and theU.S. needed someone they could > >hate-- this would strengthen their identification with their own society. > >And Brzezinski, the mad dog, as adviser to President Jimmy Carter, > >campaigned for the exclusive right of the U.S. to seize all the raw > >materials of the world, especiallyoil and gas. > > > >Q: You mean, the events of Sept. 11-- > > > >Von Buelow: --fit perfectly in the concept of the armaments industry, the > >intelligence agencies, the whole military-industrial-academic complex. This > >is in fact conspicuous. The huge raw materials reserves of the former > >Soviet > >Union are now at their disposal, also the pipeline routes and-- > > > >Q: Erich Follach described that at length in Spiegel: ``It's amatter of > >military bases, drugs, oil and gas reserves.'' > > > >Von Buelow: I can state: the planning of the attacks was technically and > >organizationally a master achievement. To hijack four huge airplanes within > >a few minutes and within one hour, to drive them into their targets, with > >complicated flight maneuvers! This is unthinkable, without years-long > >support from secret apparatuses of the state and industry. > > > >Q: You are a conspiracy theorist! > > > >Von Buelow: Yeah, yeah. That's the ridicule heaped [on those raising these > >questions] by those who would prefer to follow the official, politically > >correct line. Even investigative journalists are fed propaganda and > >disinformation. Anyone who doubts that, doesn't have all his marbles! That > >is your accusation. > > > >Q: Your career actually speaks against the idea that you are not in your > >right mind. You were already in the 1970s, state secretary in theDefense > >Ministry; in 1993 you were the SPD [Social Democratic Party] speaker in the > >Schalk-Golodkowski investigation committee-- > > > >Von Buelow: And it all began there! Until that time, I did not have any > >great knowledge of the work of intelligence agencies. And now we had to > >take > >note of a great discrepancy: We shed light on the dealings of the Stasi and > >other East bloc intelligence agencies in the field of economic criminality, > >but as soon as we wanted to know something about the activities of the BND > >[German intelligence agency] or the CIA, it was mercilessly blocked. No > >information, no cooperation, nothing! That's when I was first taken aback. > > > > > >"On the surface, selling arms to a country that sponsors terrorism, of > >course, clearly, you'd have to argue it's wrong, but it's the exception > >sometimes that proves the rule." > > > > - George Bush on Good Morning America. 01/28/87 > > > > > >"You f**king son of a bitch, I saw what you wrote. We're not going to > >forget > >this.", > > > > - George W. Bush shouted at writer & editor Al Hunt, > > & his 6 yr old son in a restaurant - 1988 ....
|
| Files Listed: 41 |
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information,
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|