News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinesecuritylegislationpatriot-act — Viewing Item


Strip citizenship { February 9 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.sunspot.net/bal-te.bangtwo09feb09,0,5995668.story?coll=bal-home-headlines

Cole said he was also troubled by proposals that would give the attorney general more authority to deport aliens and to strip Americans of their citizenship if they were shown to be working with a foreign terrorist group.

http://www.sunspot.net/bal-te.bangtwo09feb09,0,5995668.story?coll=bal-home-headlines

Plan would limit rights of terror suspects
Justice Dept. drafts bill seeking power to keep arrests secret, deny bail
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By David G. Savage
Special To The Sun
Originally published February 9, 2003



WASHINGTON - The Justice Department is considering asking Congress for more power to arrest suspected terrorists and to hold them in secret.
Its draft bill, dubbed the "Patriot Act II," would build on the legislation enacted at the urging of Attorney General John Ashcroft in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

More than 1,200 people were taken into custody then and questioned as possible terrorists. They were not charged with crimes but instead were held on immigration charges or as "material witnesses" to a crime. Ashcroft refused to reveal the names of those who had been taken into custody.

Last year, a federal judge in Washington ruled that the government must release these names under the Freedom of Information Act. The new bill proposes to change that act to prohibit the "disclosure of terrorism investigation detainee information." If enacted into law, the proposal would allow the government to keep secret the names of those taken into custody.

A second proposal would give the government greater authority to hold suspects and deny them bail while they await a trial.

In recent terrorism-related cases, judges held bail hearings and, in a few instances, released suspects on bail prior to their trial. The release came after the judge concluded the suspects posed no danger to the public and were unlikely to flee.

The draft bill proposes to add to the law a new "presumption for pretrial detention in cases involving terrorism."

"This presumption is warranted," the proposal asserts, "because of the unparalleled magnitude of the danger to the United States and its people posed by acts of terrorism, and because terrorism is engaged in by groups - many with international connections - that are often in position to help their members flee or go into hiding."

The draft bill would also set up a DNA database of people associated with terrorist groups.

The draft bill was circulated within the Justice Department last month, but a spokeswoman said it has not been approved by Ashcroft or the White House for transmission to Congress.

"There is nothing final here. This is an early draft," said Barbara Comstock, the department's chief spokeswoman. "We are always looking for new ways to protect the American people from terrorists. That should not be surprising.

"During our internal deliberations, many ideas are considered, some are discarded and new ideas emerge in the process," she added.

Staffers on Capitol Hill said they had not seen the proposal.

"This sounds like an internal working draft. As far as we know, it hasn't gone to anyone on the Hill," said Jeff Lungren, a spokesman for the House Judiciary Committee.

The draft was released late Friday by the Center for Public Integrity in Washington, D.C.

Georgetown University Law Professor David Cole, a frequent critic of the Bush administration's anti-terrorism efforts, said he found the proposal troubling.

"We have not had secret arrests in this country, and this would head us in that direction," Cole said. "If someone is picked up by the government, that should be a public fact. We need to maintain that transparency to assure the government is following the law."

Cole said he was also troubled by proposals that would give the attorney general more authority to deport aliens and to strip Americans of their citizenship if they were shown to be working with a foreign terrorist group.

Last year, Ashcroft gave FBI agents the authority to spy on people in public places, including churches and mosques. Gregory Nojeim, associate director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Washington, D.C, office, said Ashcroft's department was seeking to give local police the same spying authority.

"When you repeal guidelines that govern police spying, it affects everyone, especially those who disagree with the government," Nojeim said. "At a time like this, we need to protect the right to dissent."

David G. Savage writes for the Los Angeles Times, a Tribune Publishing newspaper.



Copyright © 2003, The Baltimore Sun



2005 patriot act to expand death penalty
Aclu loses court patriot act
Ashcroft pushing patriot 2 { June 12 2003 }
Battle heats up over patriot act renewal { December 14 2005 }
Boot of the patriot act { May 2 2003 }
Bush pushes renewal of patriot act
Bush reveals terror plot to pass patriot act { January 2006 }
Bush shuns patriot act requirement { March 24 2006 }
Companies offer patriot act compliance financial services
Constitutional rights champion warns patriot acts danger { October 1 2003 }
Fbi can get sensitive reocrds of anybody
Groups urge partial lapse of patriot act { March 23 2005 }
Guide to the patriot act { September 8 2003 }
House and senate strikes deal on patriot act renewal
House votes to extent patriot act
House will not curb patriot act { July 9 2004 }
Hr3162 patriot act [pdf]
Judge opposes vagueness in anti terror laws { January 30 2004 }
Judge strikes down part of patriot act { September 29 2004 }
Justice department says fbi misused patriot act
Legislation affects average citizens { December 21 2003 }
Libraries post patriot act warnings { March 10 2003 }
New court challenge to patriot act { August 6 2003 }
No private attorneys to challenge patriot act { September 5 2004 }
Patriot act 2 dreadful { February 13 2003 }
Patriot act 2 { February 21 2003 }
Patriot act abuse compaints documented
Patriot act abuses immigrants beaten { July 21 2003 }
Patriot act allows judge appointment without consent { February 7 2007 }
Patriot act banking rules { October 1 2003 }
Patriot act challenges restricted to secret court { August 30 2004 }
Patriot act expansion woulnd let fbi bypass courts { May 19 2005 }
Patriot act used on strip club { November 5 2003 }
Patriot act used to pursue unrelated cases { October 3 2003 }
Patriot high treason { July 4 2002 }
Republicans oppose provisions in patriot act
Senate approves patriot act renewal { March 3 2006 }
Senate deal kills extension { May 9 2003 }
Senate ends feingold patriot act filibuster { February 2006 }
Smorgasbord of investigations
Stealth implementation of patriot act ii { January 12 2004 }
Strip citizenship { February 9 2003 }
Use of statute in corruption case unprecendented { November 5 2003 }
Used in 16 year old deportation case { September 23 2003 }
VICTORYAct [pdf]

Files Listed: 45



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple