News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinesecuritylegislationpatriot-act — Viewing Item


Patriot act allows judge appointment without consent { February 7 2007 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0702070089feb07,1,2969751.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0702070089feb07,1,2969751.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed

Senators scrutinize prosecutor dismissals
7 U.S. attorneys sacked; 1 replaced by Rove aide

By Karoun Demirjian
Washington Bureau

February 7, 2007

WASHINGTON -- A year ago, Carol Lam, the U.S. attorney in San Diego, was fielding accolades for her successful prosecution of Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, the California congressman who pleaded guilty to tax evasion and corruption and was sent to prison for more than 8 years.

Now, however, she is one of seven federal prosecutors that the Bush administration has removed from office in recent weeks, most for unspecified reasons, as was the case with Lam. The dismissals are unusual, and that has prompted several Democratic senators to accuse the White House of taking undue aim at U.S. prosecutors, either to make way for up-and-coming Republicans or to punish those who aggressively prosecuted friends of the administration.

The Justice Department has strongly denied the allegations but also has refused to publicly give any reasons for the dismissals.

Deputy Atty. Gen. Paul McNulty defended the firings Tuesday at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. "U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president--they come and go for lots of reasons. . . . We don't really believe we are obligated to set forth a reason or cause," McNulty said.

The nation's 94 U.S. attorneys, the chief federal prosecutors in their respective cities or geographic regions, generally are appointed at the beginning of a president's term, and barring serious misconduct, serve until the end of his time in office or until they choose to leave voluntarily.

The current round of removals has attracted Democratic attention because of a little-noticed measure that was slipped into the Patriot Act Reauthorization last year allowing the White House to circumvent the Senate approval process for U.S. attorneys by making open-ended interim appointments.

Since President Bush signed the bill, about a dozen U.S. attorneys have resigned. McNulty said at least seven of the resignations were sought by the Justice Department. But he said only the resignation of H.E. Cummins III of Little Rock, Ark., was sought without a specific job-performance-related cause. Cummins was replaced by J. Timothy Griffin, a military prosecutor and former assistant to top White House political adviser Karl Rove.

McNulty told the Senate panel that the administration still is consulting senators to identify the best candidates in their respective states and fully intends to send the prosecutors' replacements to the Senate for confirmation. But suspicious Judiciary Committee members said they plan to vote Thursday to rescind the Patriot Act provision allowing the interim U.S. attorney appointments without Senate confirmation.

Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) told the committee, "I am convinced that the administration and future administrations will bypass the Senate if the law isn't changed." He said he doubted that in the seven months since Cummins had first been asked to step down that the administration couldn't send an official nominee to the Senate for confirmation. "This is larger than any party affiliation or any single appointment," Pryor said.

Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) bristled at allegations that he had played any part in crafting the clause on interim appointments in the Patriot Act and agreed to cooperate to revert the law on U.S. attorney appointments back to its pre-2006 state. In the earlier law, interim terms expire after 120 days, and if no replacement can be nominated and confirmed in that time, the local federal court names a replacement.

But McNulty said that arrangement has caused problems in the past, such as in South Dakota in 2005, when a U.S. district judge's appointee for interim U.S. attorney was overruled by the Justice Department in favor of a candidate it selected, precipitating a legal dispute.

But several senators said the alternative in the Patriot Act, possibly cutting them entirely out of the appointment process, is unacceptable.

"The Patriot Act should not have been amended," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who sponsored the measure to revise the law. "I do not believe anyone in this committee knew it was in the law--no Republican, no Democrat."

Not all members of the Judiciary Committee voiced concern about the firings. "For seven out of 94 to be asked to step down is not that big a deal to me," said Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.). "My personal opinion is that the Department of Justice is far too reticent in reviewing U.S. attorneys that do not perform."

- - -

U.S. attorneys out

H.E. "Bud" Cummins--Little Rock

Carol Lam--San Diego

Kevin Ryan--San Francisco

John McKay--Seattle

David Iglesias--Albuquerque

Daniel Bogden--Las Vegas

Paul Charlton--Phoenix

Copyright © 2007, Chicago Tribune



2005 patriot act to expand death penalty
Aclu loses court patriot act
Ashcroft pushing patriot 2 { June 12 2003 }
Battle heats up over patriot act renewal { December 14 2005 }
Boot of the patriot act { May 2 2003 }
Bush pushes renewal of patriot act
Bush reveals terror plot to pass patriot act { January 2006 }
Bush shuns patriot act requirement { March 24 2006 }
Companies offer patriot act compliance financial services
Constitutional rights champion warns patriot acts danger { October 1 2003 }
Fbi can get sensitive reocrds of anybody
Groups urge partial lapse of patriot act { March 23 2005 }
Guide to the patriot act { September 8 2003 }
House and senate strikes deal on patriot act renewal
House votes to extent patriot act
House will not curb patriot act { July 9 2004 }
Hr3162 patriot act [pdf]
Judge opposes vagueness in anti terror laws { January 30 2004 }
Judge strikes down part of patriot act { September 29 2004 }
Justice department says fbi misused patriot act
Legislation affects average citizens { December 21 2003 }
Libraries post patriot act warnings { March 10 2003 }
New court challenge to patriot act { August 6 2003 }
No private attorneys to challenge patriot act { September 5 2004 }
Patriot act 2 dreadful { February 13 2003 }
Patriot act 2 { February 21 2003 }
Patriot act abuse compaints documented
Patriot act abuses immigrants beaten { July 21 2003 }
Patriot act allows judge appointment without consent { February 7 2007 }
Patriot act banking rules { October 1 2003 }
Patriot act challenges restricted to secret court { August 30 2004 }
Patriot act expansion woulnd let fbi bypass courts { May 19 2005 }
Patriot act used on strip club { November 5 2003 }
Patriot act used to pursue unrelated cases { October 3 2003 }
Patriot high treason { July 4 2002 }
Republicans oppose provisions in patriot act
Senate approves patriot act renewal { March 3 2006 }
Senate deal kills extension { May 9 2003 }
Senate ends feingold patriot act filibuster { February 2006 }
Smorgasbord of investigations
Stealth implementation of patriot act ii { January 12 2004 }
Strip citizenship { February 9 2003 }
Use of statute in corruption case unprecendented { November 5 2003 }
Used in 16 year old deportation case { September 23 2003 }
VICTORYAct [pdf]

Files Listed: 45



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple