News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinesecuritylegislationpatriot-act — Viewing Item


Boot of the patriot act { May 2 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-halperin2may02,1,3211625.story

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-halperin2may02,1,3211625.story
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0502-06.htm

COMMENTARY

Feeling the Boot Heel of the Patriot Act
By Jason Halperin

May 2, 2003

Several weeks ago, my roommate Asher and I went to an Indian restaurant just off Times Square in the heart of midtown Manhattan. We helped ourselves to the buffet and sat down to begin eating.

Suddenly there was a terrible commotion and five police officers in bulletproof vests stormed down the stairs. They had their guns drawn and were pointing them indiscriminately at the restaurant staff and at us.

"Go to the back of the restaurant," they yelled. I hesitated, lost in my own panic. "Did you not hear me? Go to the back and sit down," they demanded. I complied and looked around at the other patrons. There were eight men including the waiter, all of South Asian descent and ranging from late teens to senior citizen. One of the officers pointed his gun in the waiter's face and shouted: "Is there anyone else in the restaurant?" The waiter, terrified, gestured to the kitchen.

The police placed their fingers on the triggers of their guns and kicked open the kitchen doors. Shouts emanated from the kitchen and a few seconds later five Latino men crawled out on their hands and knees, guns pointed at them.

After patting us all down, the five officers seated us at two tables. As they continued to kick open doors to closets and restrooms with their fingers glued to their triggers, officials in business suits emerged from the stairwell. Two walked over to our table and identified themselves as agents of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Homeland Security Department.

Having some limited knowledge of the rights afforded to U.S. citizens, I asked why we were being held. The INS agent said we would be released once they confirmed that there were no outstanding warrants against us and our immigration status was OK.

In pre-9/11 America, the legality of this would have been questionable. After all, the 4th Amendment states: "The right of the people to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures. "

"You have no right to hold us," said Asher. But they explained that they did: This was a homeland security investigation under the authority of the Patriot Act.

The Patriot Act was passed into law on Oct. 26, 2001, in order to facilitate the post-9/11 crackdown on terrorism. Among the unprecedented rights it grants to the federal government are the right to wiretap or detain without a warrant. As I quickly discovered, the right to an attorney has been fudged as well. When I asked to speak to a lawyer, the INS official told me I did have the right to a lawyer but I would have to be taken to the station for security clearance before being granted one. When I asked how long that would take, he replied with a coy smile: "Maybe a day, maybe a week, maybe a month."

We insisted that we had every right to leave and were going to do so. One of the police officers, with his hand on his gun, taunted: "Go ahead and leave, just go ahead." We remained seated.

Our IDs were taken. I was questioned why my license was from out of state and asked whether I had "something to hide." The police continued to hassle the kitchen workers, demanding licenses and dates of birth. One of the kitchen workers was shaking and kept providing the day's date — March 20, 2003 — over and over.

As I continued to press for legal counsel, a female officer put her finger in my face. "We are at war, we are at war and this is for your safety," she exclaimed. As she walked away from the table, she continued to repeat it to herself. "We are at war, we are at war; how can they not understand this?"

I most certainly understand that we are at war, and that we need some measure of security in times like these. But I also understand that the freedoms in the Constitution were meant specifically for times like these.

After an hour and a half, the INS agent returned our licenses. An officer escorted us out. Before we left, the INS agent apologized.

Among the customers, there were four taxi drivers, two students, one newspaper salesman. Several said they were U.S. citizens. I doubt they received apologies. Nor have the hundreds of immigrants being held without charge. Apparently, this type of treatment is acceptable.

Three days after the incident, I phoned the restaurant. The owner was nervous, embarrassed and did not want to talk about it. But I managed to ascertain that the whole thing had been one giant mistake.

A mistake. Loaded guns pointed in faces, people made to crawl, police officers kicking in doors, taunting, keeping their fingers on the trigger even after the situation was under control. A mistake.

And, according to the ACLU, a perfectly legal one, thanks to the Patriot Act.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jason Halperin lives in New York City.



2005 patriot act to expand death penalty
Aclu loses court patriot act
Ashcroft pushing patriot 2 { June 12 2003 }
Battle heats up over patriot act renewal { December 14 2005 }
Boot of the patriot act { May 2 2003 }
Bush pushes renewal of patriot act
Bush reveals terror plot to pass patriot act { January 2006 }
Bush shuns patriot act requirement { March 24 2006 }
Companies offer patriot act compliance financial services
Constitutional rights champion warns patriot acts danger { October 1 2003 }
Fbi can get sensitive reocrds of anybody
Groups urge partial lapse of patriot act { March 23 2005 }
Guide to the patriot act { September 8 2003 }
House and senate strikes deal on patriot act renewal
House votes to extent patriot act
House will not curb patriot act { July 9 2004 }
Hr3162 patriot act [pdf]
Judge opposes vagueness in anti terror laws { January 30 2004 }
Judge strikes down part of patriot act { September 29 2004 }
Justice department says fbi misused patriot act
Legislation affects average citizens { December 21 2003 }
Libraries post patriot act warnings { March 10 2003 }
New court challenge to patriot act { August 6 2003 }
No private attorneys to challenge patriot act { September 5 2004 }
Patriot act 2 dreadful { February 13 2003 }
Patriot act 2 { February 21 2003 }
Patriot act abuse compaints documented
Patriot act abuses immigrants beaten { July 21 2003 }
Patriot act allows judge appointment without consent { February 7 2007 }
Patriot act banking rules { October 1 2003 }
Patriot act challenges restricted to secret court { August 30 2004 }
Patriot act expansion woulnd let fbi bypass courts { May 19 2005 }
Patriot act used on strip club { November 5 2003 }
Patriot act used to pursue unrelated cases { October 3 2003 }
Patriot high treason { July 4 2002 }
Republicans oppose provisions in patriot act
Senate approves patriot act renewal { March 3 2006 }
Senate deal kills extension { May 9 2003 }
Senate ends feingold patriot act filibuster { February 2006 }
Smorgasbord of investigations
Stealth implementation of patriot act ii { January 12 2004 }
Strip citizenship { February 9 2003 }
Use of statute in corruption case unprecendented { November 5 2003 }
Used in 16 year old deportation case { September 23 2003 }
VICTORYAct [pdf]

Files Listed: 45



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple