News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinesecuritylegislationpatriot-act — Viewing Item


Fbi can get sensitive reocrds of anybody

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=domesticNews&storyID=4977529§ion=news

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=domesticNews&storyID=4977529§ion=news

ACLU Reveals Secret Suit Over FBI Powers
Wed Apr 28, 2004 06:23 PM ET

By Gail Appleson
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The American Civil Liberties Union disclosed on Wednesday it had secretly sued the government over a provision of the Patriot Act that allows the FBI to demand customer records from businesses without court approval.

The ACLU said it initially filed the civil lawsuit under seal on April 6 because it could have been prosecuted for violating a gag order contained within the Patriot Act. It said it chose to make the case public after the government agreed on Wednesday it would not seek a penalty against the ACLU.

But many details of the case, filed in Manhattan federal court, must remain secret.

The defendants include Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller. A spokesman for the Manhattan U.S. attorney's office had no comment.

At issue is the power the FBI has to execute what is known as a "National Security Letter," a form of administrative subpoena used to demand confidential financial records from companies as part of terrorism investigations.

Legislation signed by President Bush in December expands the definition of companies from which information can be obtained and allows FBI agents to send out the letters without first obtaining a judge's approval.

"The National Security Letter provision allows the FBI to demand the sensitive records of innocent people in complete secrecy, without ever appearing before a federal judge," said Jameel Jaffer, an ACLU staff attorney.

"Before the Patriot Act, the FBI could use this invasive authority only against suspected terrorists and spies," Jaffer said. "Now it can issue National Security Letters to obtain information about anyone at all. This should be disturbing to all of us."

The suit argues that the National Security Letter provision violates the constitution because it authorizes the FBI to force disclosure of sensitive information without adequate safeguards.

The FBI no longer has to show a judge there is a compelling need for the records and it does not have to specify any process that would allow a recipient to fight the demand for confidential information.

Prior to December, the letters could only be sent to certain financial institutions. However, the definition of "financial institution" in the new law is expanded to include such businesses as insurance companies, pawnbrokers, dealers in precious metals, the Postal Service, casinos, and travel agencies.

The law also bars subpoenaed businesses from revealing to anyone, including individuals who may be under investigation, that the FBI sought records of their transactions or that businesses have turned over their records. A company faces criminal penalties if it breaches the gag order.



2005 patriot act to expand death penalty
Aclu loses court patriot act
Ashcroft pushing patriot 2 { June 12 2003 }
Battle heats up over patriot act renewal { December 14 2005 }
Boot of the patriot act { May 2 2003 }
Bush pushes renewal of patriot act
Bush reveals terror plot to pass patriot act { January 2006 }
Bush shuns patriot act requirement { March 24 2006 }
Companies offer patriot act compliance financial services
Constitutional rights champion warns patriot acts danger { October 1 2003 }
Fbi can get sensitive reocrds of anybody
Groups urge partial lapse of patriot act { March 23 2005 }
Guide to the patriot act { September 8 2003 }
House and senate strikes deal on patriot act renewal
House votes to extent patriot act
House will not curb patriot act { July 9 2004 }
Hr3162 patriot act [pdf]
Judge opposes vagueness in anti terror laws { January 30 2004 }
Judge strikes down part of patriot act { September 29 2004 }
Justice department says fbi misused patriot act
Legislation affects average citizens { December 21 2003 }
Libraries post patriot act warnings { March 10 2003 }
New court challenge to patriot act { August 6 2003 }
No private attorneys to challenge patriot act { September 5 2004 }
Patriot act 2 dreadful { February 13 2003 }
Patriot act 2 { February 21 2003 }
Patriot act abuse compaints documented
Patriot act abuses immigrants beaten { July 21 2003 }
Patriot act allows judge appointment without consent { February 7 2007 }
Patriot act banking rules { October 1 2003 }
Patriot act challenges restricted to secret court { August 30 2004 }
Patriot act expansion woulnd let fbi bypass courts { May 19 2005 }
Patriot act used on strip club { November 5 2003 }
Patriot act used to pursue unrelated cases { October 3 2003 }
Patriot high treason { July 4 2002 }
Republicans oppose provisions in patriot act
Senate approves patriot act renewal { March 3 2006 }
Senate deal kills extension { May 9 2003 }
Senate ends feingold patriot act filibuster { February 2006 }
Smorgasbord of investigations
Stealth implementation of patriot act ii { January 12 2004 }
Strip citizenship { February 9 2003 }
Use of statute in corruption case unprecendented { November 5 2003 }
Used in 16 year old deportation case { September 23 2003 }
VICTORYAct [pdf]

Files Listed: 45



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple