News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinecabal-elitew-administrationjudicial — Viewing Item


Conservatives rally against gonzales as justice { July 3 2005 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/03/politics/politicsspecial1/03scotus.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/03/politics/politicsspecial1/03scotus.html

July 3, 2005
Conservative Groups Rally Against Gonzales as Justice
By ADAM NAGOURNEY, TODD S. PURDUM and DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK
This article was reported and written by Adam Nagourney, Todd S. Purdum and David D. Kirkpatrick.

WASHINGTON, July 2 - Within hours after Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's announced retirement from the Supreme Court, members of conservative groups around the country convened in five national conference calls in which, participants said, they shared one big concern: heading off any effort by President Bush to nominate his attorney general, Alberto R. Gonzales to replace her.

Late last week, a delegation of conservative lawyers led by C. Boyden Gray and former Attorney General Edwin Meese III met with the White House chief of staff, Andrew H. Card Jr., to warn that appointing Mr. Gonzales would splinter conservative support.

And Paul M. Weyrich, a veteran conservative organizer and chairman of the Free Congress Foundation, said he had told administration officials that nominating Mr. Gonzales, whose views on abortion are considered suspect by religious conservatives, would fracture the president's conservative backers.

The groundswell of opposition to Mr. Gonzales was just one sign of the conflicting forces suddenly swirling around Mr. Bush this weekend as he headed to Camp David to begin considering a replacement for Justice O'Connor, a decision his aides said would not be announced before he returned from a trip to Europe at the end of next week.

Senate Democrats demanded that he consult them before making a choice and appoint a pragmatist in Justice O'Connor's mold. Conservatives, flexing their muscles in a battle they have spent a decade preparing for, described the nomination as a test of Mr. Bush's ideological convictions and past promises, and his biggest opportunity yet to assure that the Bush presidency will leave a conservative stamp for a generation to come.

And on Friday, the Rev. Miguel Rivera, president of the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders, an advocacy group that represents more than 6,000 Latino evangelical churches, sent the president a letter urging consideration of "a true conservative Latino nominee," Emilio M. Garza, a federal appeals judge from Texas.

In a telephone interview late Friday, Mr. Rivera said he had received no response. "All the meetings we have had in all the different groups today we have not heard anything to reassure us that he is out of the loop," Mr. Rivera said of Mr. Gonzales.

Administration officials discounted the conservative uprising directed against Mr. Gonzales, saying that Mr. Bush was already aware of the objections and was not convinced by them.

"It is what it is," said one senior administration official, who insisted on anonymity in exchange for discussing the White House views of the criticism of the attorney general. "The president is going to pick someone who is a true constructionist and who is correct in interpreting the law." The official said that Mr. Gonzales fit that description, but also said that Mr. Bush might be wary of moving him to a new position so shortly after he was confirmed as attorney general.

Mr. Bush planned to spend the weekend getting a head start on "homework" on a list of potential nominees and expected to "be on the phones with his advisers," said another senior administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal deliberations. He said that the president had been briefed on his staff's preparations for a court vacancy, and that "he knows the orbit of names."

Other White House aides said they had canceled holiday plans to meet with supporters and prepare for a fight whose dimensions and intensity would be, to a considerable extent, dictated by the nominee Mr. Bush settles on. There was a skeletal staff at the White House on Saturday.

Members of Congress and conservatives close to the White House said that they were confident that Mr. Bush would use the first Supreme Court vacancy of his tenure to nominate a judge in the mold of Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, as he has repeatedly promised in the past.

"They don't need me lobbying on this stuff - they know what to do," said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, a conservative group with close ties to the White House. "My only recommendation is that they nominate someone who is 12 or 13 years old," to ensure as long a conservative legacy as possible.

Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, a veteran and former chairman of the Judiciary Committee, which will hold hearings on any nominee, said flatly of Mr. Bush: "He's going to appoint a conservative. I have no doubt about that."

But Mr. Hatch, breaking with fellow conservatives, suggested in an interview that he would support Mr. Gonzales.

"Let me not get into any nominee, but Gonzales is an excellent human being," Mr. Hatch said. "He's done an exceptional job as White House counsel. He's brought additional stability and peace to the Justice Department. I know the president is interested in trying to find people of diversity - he's really bent over to do that as president of the United States."

Mr. Gonzales is a longtime Bush aide and friend from Texas, and naming him could enhance the Republican Party's standing among Hispanics, one of the president's longtime political goals. Some conservatives acknowledged that they had stated their opposition to him with some delicacy to avoid provoking the White House, given Mr. Gonzales's close friendship with the president.

But the swift and vociferous opposition to Mr. Gonzales reflected the intensity of concern on the right over just what kind of conservative Mr. Bush will choose, as he moves toward a decision that will go a long way toward settling any question about what kind of conservative he is, and how his presidency will be remembered.

Mr. Weyrich, while declining to disclose the specifics of a recent conversation with Ken Mehlman, the Republican Party chairman, said: "We have let the administration know through whatever channels we have that Gonzales would be an unwise appointment because of the opposition of some of the groups," some of which he said would actively oppose Mr. Gonzales, while "others like the Southern Baptists and myself would simply not help."

For many conservatives, who have seen Republican presidents nominate Supreme Court justices like Ms. O'Connor who then vote against them on pivotal issues, Mr. Gonzales epitomizes the fear of the unknown. But in other ways, and to some Democrats, he is very well known, confirmed by a vote of 60-to-36, along largely partisan lines, after unexpectedly contentious hearings and debate in which Democrats challenged his policies on the detention and treatment of prisoners in the administration's campaign against terror. In a 2002 legal memorandum, Mr. Gonzales characterized some provisions of the Geneva Conventions as "quaint" and "obsolete."

Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York and a member of the Judiciary Committee, declined to say on Saturday how Senate Democrats might respond to a Gonzales nomination. "It's too early to tell - we're not talking about any specific judge," Mr. Schumer said.

He described the situation with Mr. Gonzales as "a real Rubicon for this president. The hard, hard right wants a true believer."

Even at a time when they have unprecedented influence in the nation's capital, many conservative leaders have become increasingly restive at their comparative lack of sway on the court and have described the selection of the next justice as the most important decision Mr. Bush will make - even if he has to force it through at the expense of his ambitious second-term agenda.

Some Republicans warned that a very conservative nomination by Mr. Bush would guarantee a protracted legislative battle that could doom any hope Mr. Bush had of pushing through a Social Security or tax reform bill, the cornerstone initiatives of his second term.

At the same time, Kenneth M. Duberstein, who managed the Supreme Court nominations of Clarence Thomas and David H. Souter for Mr. Bush's father, said that the president could go only so far in replacing Justice O'Connor, a Reagan appointee who turned out to be a major disappointment to the right.

"Any nominee can be a notch or two to the right of Sandra Day O'Connor, but not 10 notches to the right," Mr. Duberstein said, noting that the political dynamics are different than if Mr. Bush were replacing Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, who is ill with thyroid cancer and still widely expected to retire.

Phyllis Schlafly, a longtime conservative activist, said: "Bush was very clear, and certainly his constituents believed him, when he said he would appoint justices like Scalia and Thomas. We are not in favor of Gonzales." Reflecting a widely held view among conservatives, and one of the reasons for the intensity of the sentiment on the right, Mrs. Schlafly described Justice O'Connor as "a terrible disappointment."

But other conservatives said there was no reason to fear, given Mr. Bush's record of appointing conservatives to judgeships both as governor of Texas and as president, and noted Mr. Bush's unambiguous embrace of conservative ideals.

"Whatever else you say about President Bush, he is certainly the type of man who says what he means and means what he says," said Paul Rosenzweig, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative group. "I also think it's clear that the majority who elected him - and who elected 55 members of the Senate - is looking to him to fulfill that pledge. Just as President Clinton took the opportunity to name two very liberal judges, the president's constituency will be looking to him to appoint a conservative jurist."

White House officials declined comment, saying that Mr. Bush would not make a final decision until he had finished reviewing potential candidates and consulting with Senate leaders, and that they were making an orchestrated effort to avoid saying or doing anything that would feed what they feared could be a week of speculation. One Republican with close ties to the White House said administration officials assumed that Mr. Bush would now be guaranteed at least one other vacancy to fill, if not immediately then in the not-too-distant future, and that could influence his thinking.

Among the names most frequently mentioned as likely candidates, besides Mr. Gonzales and Mr. Garza, are Judges J. Harvie Wilkinson III and J. Michael Luttig of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Va.; Judge John G. Roberts Jr., who sits on the federal appeals court in Washington; and Judge Michael W. McConnell of the 10th Circuit, in Salt Lake City. Should Mr. Bush consider a woman, the most likely candidates are Judges Edith Brown Clement and Edith H. Jones, both of the Fifth Circuit, based in New Orleans.

Republicans and Democrats agreed on the importance of the appointment for Mr. Bush's legacy, though they differed sharply - and predictably - over what kind of nominee he should choose.

Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas, said that he believed that Mr. Bush would pick "a qualified, mainstream nominee." But he acknowledged in a sign of the intense, pre-emptive battle to shape the terms of any debate that: "The problem is because of the contentious nature of the process, sometimes even mainstream nominees are caricatured in a way that makes them appear to be extreme."

Senator Jon Kyl, Republican of Arizona and a member of the Judiciary Committee, said in a telephone interview from his home state: "You know President Bush. You know the kind of person he is. You know the way he's approached personnel questions. He's going to be very straightforward about the kind of person he wants."

Todd S. Purdum and David D. Kirkpatrick reported from Washington for this article, and Adam Nagourney from New York. Richard W. Stevenson contributed reporting from Washington.



Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company


court-affirmative-action
filibuster
gonzales
roberts
After filibuster fight whitehouse readies for supreme court { May 25 2005 }
Alito memo argues for torture foreigners { November 29 2005 }
Alito rules on case helping his investment funds
Angry americans attempt seizing justice souter property { July 25 2005 }
Ashcroft in contempt of congress senator biden says { June 9 2004 }
Ashcroft retroactively classifies translator sibel edmonds case { July 5 2004 }
Ashcroft says judges threaten national security questioning bush
Attorney general refers to president bush as the client { February 7 2006 }
Bill switches claassaction lawsuits to federal courts
Bush abandons harriet miers nomination
Bush again attempts to push court candidates { December 24 2004 }
Bush attorney general calls owens rulings judicial activism { May 26 2005 }
Bush ex starr aide judgeship { June 19 2003 }
Bush pick miers cited for her religion { October 13 2005 }
Bush puts enduring imprint on nation judiciary { January 15 2006 }
Bush revives candidicies for 20 federal judgeships { February 15 2005 }
Business lobby to get behind judicial bids { January 6 2005 }
Clash over unconstitutional memo { June 9 2004 }
Committee composition dispute
Conservatives rally against gonzales as justice { July 3 2005 }
Conservatives upset over judicial pick miers { October 4 2005 }
Court pick harriet miers most discreet in adminstrative
Court pick harriet miers never has been a judge
Estrada judiciary panel { January 31 2003 }
First alito decision sides with liberals on execution
Frist ethics skeletons
Frist majority leader
Frist seeks chirstain support for judicial nominees { April 25 2005 }
Frist settlement
Frist to end filibusters { May 9 2003 }
Groups sue over erased scalia tapes { May 11 2004 }
Janice rogers brown plays blacks against each other
Journalists ordered to erase scalia speech
Judge admits voiding whistleblower lawsuit draconian { July 7 2004 }
Judge janice brown militant about property rights
Judge no bar { March 17 2001 }
Judicial block
Judicial spare
Lawmakers clash on class action suit bill { July 7 2004 }
Lott not happy with new bush pick
New nominee nicknamed scalito or little scalia { October 31 2005 }
Owens confirmation deals blow to environment { May 25 2005 }
Pickering expected to win { October 1 2003 }
Pickering judicial nomination { December 18 2002 }
Priscilla owens fought by womens rights advocates { May 25 2005 }
Priscilla owens takes enron halliburton money { May 18 2005 }
Roberts avoids specifics during senate hearing { September 15 2005 }
Roberts helped reagan fight sandinistas in nicaragua { August 25 2005 }
Scalia backs police on arrests { December 14 2004 }
Scalia says americans need more orgies { October 1 2004 }
Scalia says detainees have no rights { April 3 2006 }
Scalia says judicial activism renders constitution useless { March 14 2005 }
Scalia says trip with cheney wont effect rulings { March 19 2004 }
Scalia tape erase order raises constitution questions
Scalia thinks americans need more sex orgies { October 1 2004 }
Senate democrats block 3 more bush judicial nominees { July 23 2004 }
Senates new math may aid stalled judicial nominees { February 13 2005 }
Strange judicial vote { November 14 2002 }
Strange judicial vote2 { November 15 2002 }
Supreme court shuffle { May 18 2003 }
Supreme court sides with enron accounting firm { May 31 2005 }
Supreme court vacancy not this year { June 11 2003 }
Syrians lawsuit risks national security says US
Vacancies

Files Listed: 64



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple