NewsMine — cabal-elite — w-administration — judicial — Viewing Item

Syrians lawsuit risks national security says US Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1106349012240&call_pageid=970599119419 http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1106349012240&call_pageid=970599119419 Jan. 22, 2005. 08:29 AM U.S. claims Arar suit a risk to national security MICHELLE SHEPHARD STAFF REPORTER The United States government is attempting to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Syrian-Canadian Maher Arar, claiming the litigation would jeopardize national security. Invoking the rarely used "state secrets privilege," U.S. Department of Justice lawyers filed a motion with the New York eastern district court this week, stating that the release of any information concerning the U.S.'s involvement in Arar's deportation to Syria could jeopardize "intelligence, foreign policy and national security interests of the United States." Lawyers with New York's Centre for Constitutional Rights, who filed the lawsuit on Arar's behalf a year ago, said the government is abusing claims of national security in order to avoid a review of its policies and handling of terrorism suspects. "They're asking the court to sanction their cover-up basically," lawyer Maria LaHood said yesterday. Arar was detained by immigration officials at New York's JFK airport on Sept. 26, 2002, and subsequently held as a terrorism suspect in a Brooklyn jail, where he says he repeatedly asked to be sent back to Canada. On Oct. 8 he was flown on a private jet to Syria, via Jordan. Arar says he was tortured and held without charges for a year before returning to Canada. The Centre for Constitutional Rights launched Arar's lawsuit last January alleging that former attorney-general John Ashcroft, former homeland security secretary Tom Ridge and other officials within President George W. Bush's administration knew Arar would be tortured when he was deported. Arar alleges he was a victim of the government's controversial policy of "extraordinary rendition," where American authorities can circumvent their own restraints on interrogations by sending suspects to countries that employ harsh tactics.

court-affirmative-action filibuster gonzales roberts After filibuster fight whitehouse readies for supreme court { May 25 2005 } Alito memo argues for torture foreigners { November 29 2005 } Alito rules on case helping his investment funds Angry americans attempt seizing justice souter property { July 25 2005 } Ashcroft in contempt of congress senator biden says { June 9 2004 } Ashcroft retroactively classifies translator sibel edmonds case { July 5 2004 } Ashcroft says judges threaten national security questioning bush Attorney general refers to president bush as the client { February 7 2006 } Bill switches claassaction lawsuits to federal courts Bush abandons harriet miers nomination Bush again attempts to push court candidates { December 24 2004 } Bush attorney general calls owens rulings judicial activism { May 26 2005 } Bush ex starr aide judgeship { June 19 2003 } Bush pick miers cited for her religion { October 13 2005 } Bush puts enduring imprint on nation judiciary { January 15 2006 } Bush revives candidicies for 20 federal judgeships { February 15 2005 } Business lobby to get behind judicial bids { January 6 2005 } Clash over unconstitutional memo { June 9 2004 } Committee composition dispute Conservatives rally against gonzales as justice { July 3 2005 } Conservatives upset over judicial pick miers { October 4 2005 } Court pick harriet miers most discreet in adminstrative Court pick harriet miers never has been a judge Estrada judiciary panel { January 31 2003 } First alito decision sides with liberals on execution Frist ethics skeletons Frist majority leader Frist seeks chirstain support for judicial nominees { April 25 2005 } Frist settlement Frist to end filibusters { May 9 2003 } Groups sue over erased scalia tapes { May 11 2004 } Janice rogers brown plays blacks against each other Journalists ordered to erase scalia speech Judge admits voiding whistleblower lawsuit draconian { July 7 2004 } Judge janice brown militant about property rights Judge no bar { March 17 2001 } Judicial block Judicial spare Lawmakers clash on class action suit bill { July 7 2004 } Lott not happy with new bush pick New nominee nicknamed scalito or little scalia { October 31 2005 } Owens confirmation deals blow to environment { May 25 2005 } Pickering expected to win { October 1 2003 } Pickering judicial nomination { December 18 2002 } Priscilla owens fought by womens rights advocates { May 25 2005 } Priscilla owens takes enron halliburton money { May 18 2005 } Roberts avoids specifics during senate hearing { September 15 2005 } Roberts helped reagan fight sandinistas in nicaragua { August 25 2005 } Scalia backs police on arrests { December 14 2004 } Scalia says americans need more orgies { October 1 2004 } Scalia says detainees have no rights { April 3 2006 } Scalia says judicial activism renders constitution useless { March 14 2005 } Scalia says trip with cheney wont effect rulings { March 19 2004 } Scalia tape erase order raises constitution questions Scalia thinks americans need more sex orgies { October 1 2004 } Senate democrats block 3 more bush judicial nominees { July 23 2004 } Senates new math may aid stalled judicial nominees { February 13 2005 } Strange judicial vote { November 14 2002 } Strange judicial vote2 { November 15 2002 } Supreme court shuffle { May 18 2003 } Supreme court sides with enron accounting firm { May 31 2005 } Supreme court vacancy not this year { June 11 2003 } Syrians lawsuit risks national security says US Vacancies Files Listed: 64

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.