News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinecabal-elitew-administrationjudicial — Viewing Item


Strange judicial vote2 { November 15 2002 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/15/politics/15JUDG.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/15/politics/15JUDG.html

November 15, 2002
Democrats Vote No, but Allow Judicial Nominee to Advance
By NEIL A. LEWIS


WASHINGTON, Nov. 14 — The Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee today engaged in an unusual voting maneuver that signaled their disapproval of one of President Bush's judicial nominees even as they cleared the way for his confirmation.

They first allowed the nominee, Judge Dennis Shedd, to be approved by a voice vote. Then, one by one, each of the Democrats present asked to be recorded as having voted against him.

Senate Democrats decided not to impede the nomination, and one other, in recognition that they would be approved anyway when the Republicans take over in January and to enhance their credibility when they opposed other nominees.

The Democrats' behavior meant that they are all now listed as voting against Judge Shedd, whose 12-year tenure as a federal trial judge in South Carolina has drawn criticism from civil rights groups. But they did not ask for a tally of the vote — a call for the yeas and nays — that would have blocked his confirmation.

Many veteran Senate staff aides and lobbyists said they could not recall a similar occurrence. The unusual behavior concerning the vote on Judge Shedd occurred as the committee met for the last time before the Democrats turn control over to the Republicans, who will hold a majority in the Senate in 2003. It took place against a backdrop of partisan tensions that were evident despite today's formal and polite remarks.

The committee also approved by voice vote the confirmation of Prof. Michael McConnell of the University of Utah to an appeals court seat in Denver. In contrast to Judge Shedd's nomination, a few Democrats asked to be recorded as having voted in favor of Professor McConnell; only Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, asked to be recorded as having voted against the nominee.

Democrats have used their slim majority on the committee to block those of Mr. Bush's appellate court nominees they have said are too conservative. Republicans who chafed at their inability to get all Mr. Bush's candidates confirmed were robust and confident today as they contemplated an abrupt change in the committee's output.

"I'm quite sure that things will change markedly," said Senator Orrin G. Hatch, the Utah Republican who will become the committee chairman early next year. "I would like things to be more civil around here," he said.

A senior Republican staff aide was more blunt, saying that all of Mr. Bush's nominees would be quickly confirmed and the Democrats could do little about it. The Shedd and McConnell nominations are expected to be approved by the full Senate.

The committee's meeting was the final one for Senator Strom Thurmond, the South Carolina Republican. Mr. Thurmond, the chamber's oldest member, will turn 100 years old in a few weeks and is retiring at the end of the term. Senator Thurmond, who has been frail for some time, seemed especially so today. He declined an opportunity to read a statement in support of Judge Shedd, who is being elevated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond.

Recently, Mr. Thurmond would read at least part of his statements before the committee but not engage in any back-and-forth with witnesses or colleagues. When Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, the committee chairman, asked Mr. Thurmond today if he wanted to speak, Mr. Thurmond seemed not to react.

The Shedd nomination was, still, a tribute of sorts to Mr. Thurmond. Years before, Judge Shedd had been an aide to Mr. Thurmond, who complained bitterly just before Election Day that he was offended that Mr. Leahy had not scheduled a vote on the nomination.

Mr. Durbin said in an interview that one explanation for the strange vote was that Democrats were opposed to elevating Judge Shedd but "wanted to make an effort to give Senator Thurmond a nominee that was important to him."

When it came time to vote, Mr. Leahy took a voice vote and declared that the Republicans who all shouted "aye" had bested the Democrats' "No." Then, Democrats asked to be recorded as having voted no. Senator Joseph R. Biden of Delaware, who was absent, was the only one of the committee's 10 Democrats who was not recorded as voting. The committee has nine Republicans, and even if they had been able to muster all their votes, they would have achieved only a tie in a roll call, under which the candidate loses.

Liberal advocacy groups assailed the Democrats for their actions.

"This was inconsistent with good government and responsible leadership," said Ralph Neas of People for the American Way. "All Americans have the right to know how their senators voted and why in this case they don't have the answers because of the way it was handled."



Copyright The New York Times Company | Permissions | Privacy Policy



court-affirmative-action
filibuster
gonzales
roberts
After filibuster fight whitehouse readies for supreme court { May 25 2005 }
Alito memo argues for torture foreigners { November 29 2005 }
Alito rules on case helping his investment funds
Angry americans attempt seizing justice souter property { July 25 2005 }
Ashcroft in contempt of congress senator biden says { June 9 2004 }
Ashcroft retroactively classifies translator sibel edmonds case { July 5 2004 }
Ashcroft says judges threaten national security questioning bush
Attorney general refers to president bush as the client { February 7 2006 }
Bill switches claassaction lawsuits to federal courts
Bush abandons harriet miers nomination
Bush again attempts to push court candidates { December 24 2004 }
Bush attorney general calls owens rulings judicial activism { May 26 2005 }
Bush ex starr aide judgeship { June 19 2003 }
Bush pick miers cited for her religion { October 13 2005 }
Bush puts enduring imprint on nation judiciary { January 15 2006 }
Bush revives candidicies for 20 federal judgeships { February 15 2005 }
Business lobby to get behind judicial bids { January 6 2005 }
Clash over unconstitutional memo { June 9 2004 }
Committee composition dispute
Conservatives rally against gonzales as justice { July 3 2005 }
Conservatives upset over judicial pick miers { October 4 2005 }
Court pick harriet miers most discreet in adminstrative
Court pick harriet miers never has been a judge
Estrada judiciary panel { January 31 2003 }
First alito decision sides with liberals on execution
Frist ethics skeletons
Frist majority leader
Frist seeks chirstain support for judicial nominees { April 25 2005 }
Frist settlement
Frist to end filibusters { May 9 2003 }
Groups sue over erased scalia tapes { May 11 2004 }
Janice rogers brown plays blacks against each other
Journalists ordered to erase scalia speech
Judge admits voiding whistleblower lawsuit draconian { July 7 2004 }
Judge janice brown militant about property rights
Judge no bar { March 17 2001 }
Judicial block
Judicial spare
Lawmakers clash on class action suit bill { July 7 2004 }
Lott not happy with new bush pick
New nominee nicknamed scalito or little scalia { October 31 2005 }
Owens confirmation deals blow to environment { May 25 2005 }
Pickering expected to win { October 1 2003 }
Pickering judicial nomination { December 18 2002 }
Priscilla owens fought by womens rights advocates { May 25 2005 }
Priscilla owens takes enron halliburton money { May 18 2005 }
Roberts avoids specifics during senate hearing { September 15 2005 }
Roberts helped reagan fight sandinistas in nicaragua { August 25 2005 }
Scalia backs police on arrests { December 14 2004 }
Scalia says americans need more orgies { October 1 2004 }
Scalia says detainees have no rights { April 3 2006 }
Scalia says judicial activism renders constitution useless { March 14 2005 }
Scalia says trip with cheney wont effect rulings { March 19 2004 }
Scalia tape erase order raises constitution questions
Scalia thinks americans need more sex orgies { October 1 2004 }
Senate democrats block 3 more bush judicial nominees { July 23 2004 }
Senates new math may aid stalled judicial nominees { February 13 2005 }
Strange judicial vote { November 14 2002 }
Strange judicial vote2 { November 15 2002 }
Supreme court shuffle { May 18 2003 }
Supreme court sides with enron accounting firm { May 31 2005 }
Supreme court vacancy not this year { June 11 2003 }
Syrians lawsuit risks national security says US
Vacancies

Files Listed: 64



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple