News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinecabal-elitew-administrationjudicial — Viewing Item


Attorney general refers to president bush as the client { February 7 2006 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/06/AR2006020601426.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/06/AR2006020601426.html

In Quizzing a Reticent Gonzales, Senators Encounter a Power Shortage

By Dana Milbank
Tuesday, February 7, 2006; A02



In an entire day of testimony about the Bush administration's secret wiretapping program, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales recognized the supremacy of congressional authority in precisely one instance: the power to declare a recess.

"Attorney General Gonzales, would you like a break?" Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) inquired after 90 minutes of back-and-forth.

"If you're offering a break, Mr. Chairman," the attorney general replied.

"Well, I'm not going to offer you one unless you want one," the chairman insisted.

Gonzales would have none of it. "I will defer to you, Mr. Chairman," he said, before finally accepting a brief recess.

Otherwise, Gonzales offered the legislative branch little deference yesterday, and certainly no apology for the administration's decision not to seek congressional approval for its surveillance program. "The short answer is that we didn't think we needed to, quite frankly," he declared in a typical exchange.

When did the administration decide it had the authority? "I'm not going to give an exact date," he said.

What does the administration do with the information it collects? "I can't talk about specifics."

Is the information used to obtain search warrants? "I am uncomfortable talking in great detail."

More interesting than what the attorney general said was what he would not say. Has President Bush, invoking his "inherent powers" under the Constitution, also authorized warrantless eavesdropping on domestic calls, opening of Americans' mail and e-mail, and searches of their homes and offices?

"I am not comfortable going down the road of saying yes or no as to what the president has or has not authorized," Gonzales, shifting frequently in his chair, informed the senators.

Just 13 months ago, at his confirmation hearing, Gonzales vowed that he would "no longer represent only the White House," instead representing "the United States of America and its people." Yesterday, however, he relapsed, referring to Bush at one point as "the client."

Fortunately for Gonzales, the committee members did not seem to be in any position to impose restrictions on the executive branch. They couldn't even agree on whether to administer an oath.

"He said he would be willing to be sworn," Specter reported to his colleagues, but "I think it is unwarranted."

"But Mr. Chairman, may I ask, if the witness has no objection to being sworn, why not just do it?" Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) persisted.

Specter grew irritated. "The reason I'm not going to swear him in is not up to him. Attorney General Gonzales is not the chairman. I am."

"I appeal the ruling of the chair," Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) blurted out.

Specter held a voice vote. Feingold demanded a roll-call vote. Specter complied. Feingold demanded to see the proxies.

"This," Specter observed, "is really not a very good way to begin this hearing."

The attorney general entered the hearing room flanked by bodyguards and trailed by a phalanx of lawyers carrying thick briefing books. Gonzales, in an opening statement that mentioned "enemy" 10 times and "al Qaeda" 20 times, suggested that those who questioned the legality of the program were aiding the terrorists.

"Our enemy is listening, and I cannot help but wonder if they aren't shaking their heads in amazement at the thought that anyone would imperil such a sensitive program," he said. "How can anyone conclude that it is not necessary and appropriate to intercept al Qaeda phone calls?"

Nobody had concluded that, except perhaps for the demonstrator who shouted "You're a fascist!" at Gonzales. Democrats, worried about being branded terrorist-huggers, merely complained that they hadn't been consulted. "We make the laws," Leahy pleaded. "If you believe you need new laws, then come and tell us." Gonzales nodded, his lips pinched tightly.

A trio of Republicans on the committee vied to serve as Gonzales's chief defender. Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (Utah) used his questioning time to attack those "people who are wildly saying that the president is violating the law." Sens. Jeff Sessions (Ala.) and John Cornyn (Tex.) joined the sister of a Sept. 11 victim at a news conference outside the hearing room.

But other Republicans were skeptical. "In all honesty, Mr. Attorney General," Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (S.C.) advised, the "argument that you're making is very dangerous." He warned that, eventually, "there is no check and balance."

As the hearing stretched late into the afternoon, the witness grew testier. When Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) asked him about domestic surveillance, Gonzales cut him down with "I'm not going to respond to that" and "I'm not going to answer." At another point, Gonzales cited the secret program in his boast that "it's not simply a coincidence that the United States of America has not been hit again."

After yet another rebuffed question, Leahy replied to Gonzales with a tone of mock sympathy: "Of course. I'm sorry, Mr. Attorney General, I forgot: You can't answer any questions that might be relevant."

It was about time for Congress to exercise its constitutional authority to call another recess.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company


court-affirmative-action
filibuster
gonzales
roberts
After filibuster fight whitehouse readies for supreme court { May 25 2005 }
Alito memo argues for torture foreigners { November 29 2005 }
Alito rules on case helping his investment funds
Angry americans attempt seizing justice souter property { July 25 2005 }
Ashcroft in contempt of congress senator biden says { June 9 2004 }
Ashcroft retroactively classifies translator sibel edmonds case { July 5 2004 }
Ashcroft says judges threaten national security questioning bush
Attorney general refers to president bush as the client { February 7 2006 }
Bill switches claassaction lawsuits to federal courts
Bush abandons harriet miers nomination
Bush again attempts to push court candidates { December 24 2004 }
Bush attorney general calls owens rulings judicial activism { May 26 2005 }
Bush ex starr aide judgeship { June 19 2003 }
Bush pick miers cited for her religion { October 13 2005 }
Bush puts enduring imprint on nation judiciary { January 15 2006 }
Bush revives candidicies for 20 federal judgeships { February 15 2005 }
Business lobby to get behind judicial bids { January 6 2005 }
Clash over unconstitutional memo { June 9 2004 }
Committee composition dispute
Conservatives rally against gonzales as justice { July 3 2005 }
Conservatives upset over judicial pick miers { October 4 2005 }
Court pick harriet miers most discreet in adminstrative
Court pick harriet miers never has been a judge
Estrada judiciary panel { January 31 2003 }
First alito decision sides with liberals on execution
Frist ethics skeletons
Frist majority leader
Frist seeks chirstain support for judicial nominees { April 25 2005 }
Frist settlement
Frist to end filibusters { May 9 2003 }
Groups sue over erased scalia tapes { May 11 2004 }
Janice rogers brown plays blacks against each other
Journalists ordered to erase scalia speech
Judge admits voiding whistleblower lawsuit draconian { July 7 2004 }
Judge janice brown militant about property rights
Judge no bar { March 17 2001 }
Judicial block
Judicial spare
Lawmakers clash on class action suit bill { July 7 2004 }
Lott not happy with new bush pick
New nominee nicknamed scalito or little scalia { October 31 2005 }
Owens confirmation deals blow to environment { May 25 2005 }
Pickering expected to win { October 1 2003 }
Pickering judicial nomination { December 18 2002 }
Priscilla owens fought by womens rights advocates { May 25 2005 }
Priscilla owens takes enron halliburton money { May 18 2005 }
Roberts avoids specifics during senate hearing { September 15 2005 }
Roberts helped reagan fight sandinistas in nicaragua { August 25 2005 }
Scalia backs police on arrests { December 14 2004 }
Scalia says americans need more orgies { October 1 2004 }
Scalia says detainees have no rights { April 3 2006 }
Scalia says judicial activism renders constitution useless { March 14 2005 }
Scalia says trip with cheney wont effect rulings { March 19 2004 }
Scalia tape erase order raises constitution questions
Scalia thinks americans need more sex orgies { October 1 2004 }
Senate democrats block 3 more bush judicial nominees { July 23 2004 }
Senates new math may aid stalled judicial nominees { February 13 2005 }
Strange judicial vote { November 14 2002 }
Strange judicial vote2 { November 15 2002 }
Supreme court shuffle { May 18 2003 }
Supreme court sides with enron accounting firm { May 31 2005 }
Supreme court vacancy not this year { June 11 2003 }
Syrians lawsuit risks national security says US
Vacancies

Files Listed: 64



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple