NewsMine — security — terror-suspects — enemy-combatants — jose-padilla-dirty-bomber — Viewing Item

Held indefinately 'DIRTY BOMB' SUSPECT CAN BE HELD INDEFINITELY Press Association Mon Jun 10 2002 20:21:02 ET The US citizen accused of plotting to detonate a radioactive dirty bomb in Washington faces an uncertain future in military custody. Abdullah Al Mujahir has been moved from a civilian jail to a high-security US Navy prison in South Carolina after officials determined he was an "enemy combatant" who posed a serious and continuing threat to Americans. But a US Justice Department official said there are no plans to make him face a military tribunal set up for alleged terrorists because these are only for non-Americans. Nor are there any plans to press criminal charges against the al Qaida suspect. Under US legal rules, Al Mujahir can be held indefinitely an as enemy soldier, the official said. US Attorney General John Ashcroft defended the position, claiming that Al Mujahir is being held under the laws of war and under a Supreme Court precedent which established that the military may detain a US citizen who has joined the enemy and entered America to carry out "hostile acts." The decision has been criticised by civil rights groups who said the US Government only moved him into military custody after failing to provide any evidence to keep him detained in the civilian legal system. Al Mujahir's access to a lawyer is also expected to be severely restricted now that he is in military custody. It is the latest controversy surrounding the American treatment of al Qaida and Taliban suspects. The US Government came under fire from civil rights groups across the globe when plans for military tribunals were first released last year. Under the initial proposals, defendants would in some cases not get to hear the evidence against them. The revised plan for the tribunals, released by US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in March, give the accused many of the rights enjoyed by defendants in a normal trial. But they will have limited right of appeal, and standards for evidence will be more relaxed. Evidence which a "reasonable person" would consider relevant will be allowed to be heard in the commissions. This is a looser standard than US military and civilian courts, and is likely to give prosecutors more room for manoeuvre. Hearsay evidence will be permitted, as will materials where the chain of custody cannot be fully established. US authorities said this was necessary due to the special circumstances of the war. Suspects brought before the tribunals will have the right to a civilian lawyer as well as the military one assigned to them at the cost of the government. They face the death penalty if convicted. Mr Rumsfeld's promised that the tribunals will be "fair, balanced and just". But William Shulz, executive director of Amnesty International USA, said: "We fear that in the proceedings undertaken by military commissions, justice may neither be done, nor seen to be done." No tribunals have yet been scheduled. **** U.S. Constitution: Sixth Amendment Sixth Amendment - Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions Amendment Text | Annotations In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence

Battle over dirty bomb suspect { January 17 2004 } Combatant allowed attorney { December 5 2002 } Democracts suspicious Dirty bomb arrest Dirty bomb plot { June 11 2002 } Dirty bomb suspect isolation results in mental illness { December 4 2006 } Drity bomb suspect { June 11 2002 } Fed drops attempt to charge padilla for dirty bomb { November 23 2005 } Federal judge says to release padilla Government ducks out of padilla case in supreme court Government still troubled over prosecuting padilla { January 4 2007 } Held indefinately I13684 2003Dec18L [jpg] Jose indicted to avoid supreme court ruling { November 22 2005 } Jose padilla indicted after three years no charges Judge blasts stall tactics { January 15 2003 } Judges to hear legal challenge Key padilla witnesses drugged and tortured { June 5 2006 } Lawyer visits drity bomb suspect { March 4 2004 } New civilian charges in florida against padilla Padilla al qaeda { August 28 2002 } Padilla case very light on facts Padilla illegal tortured tactics in question { November 19 2006 } Padilla lawyers asks for indictment { July 19 2005 } Patriot act author has concerns { November 30 2003 } Seized citizen is ordered released { December 19 2003 } Sept 05 court gives bush right to detain without charges { September 10 2005 } Suspect can meet lawyers { March 11 2003 } Washington trick Files Listed: 29

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.