News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinecabal-eliteelection-fraudelectronic — Viewing Item


Diebold maryland reviews elections systems software { March 17 2006 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/16/AR2006031602045.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/16/AR2006031602045.html

Ehrlich Seeks to Fund Voting Machine Change
Request Part of Supplemental Budget

By Ann E. Marimow
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 17, 2006; B04



Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R) is seeking $21.8 million to change voting machines for the coming election as part of a $400 million supplemental budget he submitted yesterday to the General Assembly.

The State Board of Elections, however, said yesterday that it would take nearly twice as much money to switch from touch-screen machines to a system that uses paper ballots. And the board refused to endorse dropping Maryland's touch-screen machines for the September primary.

"How in the heck are we going to do this in six months and not drop the ball?'' said board Chairman Gilles W. Burger, explaining the board's decision. "We know what it takes, and we do not want to jeopardize the ability to conduct a successful election."

The election board, after a private meeting Wednesday, did embrace the governor's call for two new security tests of the touch-screen machines, which critics contend are vulnerable to hacking that could affect the outcome of elections.

Last week, the House unanimously passed legislation to lease optical-scan machines for one year, and the governor asked the board to join him in backing that approach. The decision by the election board adds uncertainty about how Maryland voters will cast ballots this year.

"I don't think it's a setback," Ehrlich's policy director, Joseph M. Getty, said of the decision by the five-member panel, which includes four Ehrlich appointees. "They recognize the shortcomings with the equipment. The governor's position is whatever is worked out needs to have a paper trail."

Since 2002, Maryland has invested $90 million in a statewide system of touch-screen machines manufactured by Diebold Elections Systems. State Elections Administrator Linda H. Lamone has defended it as the most accurate in the country. But questions about the security of Diebold machines in California and other states have renewed calls to revisit Maryland's system, which uses similar technology.

Mark Radke, Diebold's director of marketing, said of the board's plan for new tests, "We welcome the opportunity to demonstrate once again that Maryland has the most accurate and most secure system."

The sponsor of the optical-scan legislation, Del. Sheila E. Hixson (D-Montgomery), estimated a cost of at least $13 million to lease a paper system. But the election board reviewed a proposal Wednesday from a company called Elections Systems & Software to lease 6,000 machines to the state for $39 million.

Senators appear headed in a different direction. In a preliminary review of the governor's supplemental spending plan yesterday, budget writers said money for a new system should be tied to other legislation and redirected most of the $21.8 million to an electronic voter registry to guard against fraud in early voting.

Senators have talked with Diebold officials about using a small number of touch-screen machines that provide a paper receipt. Radke has discussed with senators a limited pilot program that he estimated would cost $50,000. That approach, however, would not satisfy Ehrlich or paper trail advocates who consider it a "band-aid."

The Senate is poised today to approve its $29 billion spending plan for fiscal 2007, in addition to a revised supplemental budget. The House plans to debate its version of the budget next week.

Ehrlich's $433 million plan also would allow the state to hire 160 more prison guards, freeze tuition for undergraduate students at public colleges and universities, increase monthly payments for foster families and help low-income households cope with rising energy costs.

It includes $10 million for a University of Maryland Journalism School building, $1.25 million for maintenance and repairs to the State House and $65,000 to defray travel costs for the Morgan State University choir's concerts in Prague.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company



2004-general
2004-primaries
dissent
franklin-county
rollout
voting-disputes
About election systems and software inc
Companies close relationships election officials { August 4 2003 }
Compuware testing ohio machines
Control voting machines { January 31 2003 }
Convincted felons work for voting companies
Crooks in control { September 16 2002 }
Diebold backs of legal challenge
Diebold ceo committed to bush { November 9 2003 }
Diebold ceo to help bush
Diebold glitch not affecting scan equipment { September 30 2003 }
Diebold maryland reviews elections systems software { March 17 2006 }
Diebold stops executives from making political donations
Diebold sues over california voting systems
Electronic voting paper trail idea attacked { December 21 2006 }
Field grows for voting machines
Goldwater voting machine { November 16 2002 }
Grand jury grants chico ca machines
How bush wins 2004
Judge denies electronic voting challenge to march elections
Left accused of vote machine fraud before 2006 election { October 29 2006 }
More state of the art machines not chosen { June 17 2003 }
Pentagon program for internet voting insecure { January 22 2004 }
Republicans will take care of the vote counting { November 15 2004 }
Selections committee violated provisions { July 14 2003 }
Sen hagel connections { January 29 2003 }
Seqouia prices higher than others { September 10 2003 }
Sequoia comments on diebold
Sequoia prints recall ballots { August 12 2003 }
Sequoia software unprotected
Sequoia threatens legal action ohio
Task force finds voting machines easily manipulated { June 27 2006 }
Two voting companies two brothers count eighty percent { April 27 2004 }
Urosevich brothers run two top vote machine companies { April 28 2004 }
Vote machines rothschilds
Voting machine companies refuse disability access
Voting machines ensure bush victory

Files Listed: 36



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple