NewsMine — cabal-elite — election-fraud — electronic — Viewing Item

Selections committee violated provisions { July 14 2003 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://www.sbsun.com/Stories/0,1413,208~12588~1512728,00.html http://www.sbsun.com/Stories/0,1413,208~12588~1512728,00.html Article Published: Monday, July 14, 2003 - 8:48:27 PM PST In Brief By Staff Reports REDLANDS: Museum closed to install AC Amid hot summer weather The San Bernardino County Museum will be closed today through Thursday so officials can install temporary air-conditioning, museum officials announced. The museum's current air-conditioning equipment, installed in 1974, is malfunctioning. The museum was already replacing that equipment, but it plans to install a temporary chiller to keep patrons comfortable and prevent damage to museum collections, officials said. The museum will reopen Friday. A scheduled free-admission day Sunday, sponsored by Beaver Medical Clinic, will go ahead as planned, officials said. For more information, call the museum at (909) 307-2669. SAN BERNARDINO: An appeals panel considering protests over the selection process for an electronic-voting system is preparing its draft report, Assistant County Administrator John Goss said Monday. The panel will announce its findings once the report is completed, Goss said. It is possible the report could be sent to the board later this week, in time for the board to consider approving a vendor for the system at its meeting on July 22, he said. The panel is considering appeals by Ohio-based Diebold Inc. and a partnership between Virginia-based Maximus and Texas-based Hart InterCivic, which were passed over by a county selection committee for its recommendation. The committee instead recommended Oakland-based Sequoia Voting Systems, which built the touchscreen voting system used in Riverside County. The two other contenders filed appeals, charging the selection panel violated provisions of the county's request for proposals.

2004-general 2004-primaries dissent franklin-county rollout voting-disputes About election systems and software inc Companies close relationships election officials { August 4 2003 } Compuware testing ohio machines Control voting machines { January 31 2003 } Convincted felons work for voting companies Crooks in control { September 16 2002 } Diebold backs of legal challenge Diebold ceo committed to bush { November 9 2003 } Diebold ceo to help bush Diebold glitch not affecting scan equipment { September 30 2003 } Diebold maryland reviews elections systems software { March 17 2006 } Diebold stops executives from making political donations Diebold sues over california voting systems Electronic voting paper trail idea attacked { December 21 2006 } Field grows for voting machines Goldwater voting machine { November 16 2002 } Grand jury grants chico ca machines How bush wins 2004 Judge denies electronic voting challenge to march elections Left accused of vote machine fraud before 2006 election { October 29 2006 } More state of the art machines not chosen { June 17 2003 } Pentagon program for internet voting insecure { January 22 2004 } Republicans will take care of the vote counting { November 15 2004 } Selections committee violated provisions { July 14 2003 } Sen hagel connections { January 29 2003 } Seqouia prices higher than others { September 10 2003 } Sequoia comments on diebold Sequoia prints recall ballots { August 12 2003 } Sequoia software unprotected Sequoia threatens legal action ohio Task force finds voting machines easily manipulated { June 27 2006 } Two voting companies two brothers count eighty percent { April 27 2004 } Urosevich brothers run two top vote machine companies { April 28 2004 } Vote machines rothschilds Voting machine companies refuse disability access Voting machines ensure bush victory Files Listed: 36

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.