NewsMine — war-on-terror — iraq — 2003-invasion — warplan — Viewing Item

Bush blair admit war months Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=391491 http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=391491 Blair and Bush admit that war in Iraq could now last for months By Andrew Grice Political Editor at Camp David 28 March 2003 Tony Blair and George Bush braced the British and American public for a longer-than- expected war in Iraq yesterday amid growing concern that the campaign has stalled. After eight hours of talks at President Bush's Camp David retreat in Maryland, the two leaders did not deny suggestions from US military sources that the war could take months. But they sought to allay fears that the campaign had been blown off course, with coalition troops encountering stiffer resistance than expected and the hoped-for uprising by Iraqis failing to materialise. Despite minor successes yesterday, including the destruction of 14 Iraqi tanks by British forces, no sign of substantial progress was perceived in the battles for Basra and Baghdad. The US strategy of invading Iraq with relatively small, light mobile forces is coming under increasing criticism from within and outside the US military. Armoured reinforcements may take up to a month to assemble near Baghdad. Pentagon sources said last night that the frontline US fighting force in the Gulf would be doubled to 200,000 by the end of April. The officials insisted that this was part of the original war plan Ð not a reaction to the set-backs of recent days. Asked at a press conference how long war may last, Mr Bush said: "However long it takes to win. However long it takes to achieve our objectives ... The Iraqi people have got to know they will be liberated and Saddam Hussein will be removed no matter how long it takes.'' Mr Blair insisted the campaign had achieved a "massive amount'' but refused to speculate on how long it would last. "We will carry on until the job is done but there is absolutely no point in trying to set a time limit. It is not set by time. It is set by the nature of the job.'' Allied forces had some success yesterday, helped by the lifting of the sandstorms that had hampered their advance for two days. Tanks of the Royal Scots Dragoon Guards fought the biggest tank battle involving British forces since the Second World War, destroying 14 Iraqi tanks that attempted to escape from the southern city of Basra. Air raids resumed on Republican Guard positions south of Baghdad as advance American units said they were prepared to start within two to three days the battle for the city of Karbala, 70 miles south-west of the capital. More than 30 US Marines were injured in a 90-minute battle near the southern city of Nasiriyah Ð apparently when two units mistook each other for the enemy. Kurdish guerrillas moved a few miles into Iraqi territory after 1,000 American paratroops were dropped into Kurdish-held territory on Wednesday night. The Iraqi Defence Minister said he expected the Allies to encircle Baghdad within 10 days but he forecast that they would go on to lose a street-to-street battle for the city, which could last for months. Sultan Hashim Ahmed said: "The enemy can go in the desert as far as it wants. In the end, where can he go? He has to enter the city." Asked if he expected street fighting in Baghdad, he said: "Definitely." At the joint press conference, with President Bush, Mr Blair condemned television pictures showing two dead British soldiers, who, he said, had been executed. "If anyone needed any further evidence of the depravity of Saddam's regime, this atrocity provides it ... To the families of the soldiers, it is an act of cruelty beyond comprehension. Indeed, it is beyond the comprehension of anyone with an ounce of humanity in their soul.'' The two leaders agreed to ask the United Nations to resume immediately its oil-for-food programme in Iraq, setting aside for now their differences over the UN's role in the running of post-war Iraq. General Norman Schwarzkopf, the Allied commander in the 1991 Gulf War, said coalition forces should "sit and wait'' outside Baghdad for reinforce-ments. He said "the worst thing of all'' would be to go in without overwhelming force. 28 March 2003 08:40 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Legal | Contact us | Advertise in print | Subscribe to the print edition | Sign up for our free daily news update | Other Digital sites © 2003 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd

Asking israel for advice Aziz war going well Blair delayed 911 iraq attack { April 3 2003 } Bush blair admit war months Dangerous advise gop split { March 31 2003 } General denies asking more troops { March 30 2003 } Iraqi militia backed by special forces { April 8 2003 } Lessons of lebanon { March 30 2003 } Longer harder than predicted { March 23 2003 } Moab bomb to iraq { April 10 2003 } No coalition control of cities Peter arnett warplan failed { March 30 2003 } Planning more invasions { March 26 2003 } Possible use moab { April 10 2003 } Rolling start Saving civilians lengthens war { March 27 2003 } Tomahawk cruise missiles supply { April 1 2003 } Upbeat forecast questioned { March 29 2003 } War conduct is defended { March 26 2003 } War far from over { March 26 2003 } War gets ugly { March 24 2003 } War plan failed arnett { March 31 2003 } Will become quagmire { March 24 2003 } Files Listed: 23

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.