News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinewar-on-terroriraniran-nuclear-threat — Viewing Item


Nations doubt iran nuclear progress { April 10 2007 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18045953/

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18045953/

Doubts swirl around Iran's nuke claims
Nation announced giant step, but experts and world powers are skeptical
The Associated Press

Updated: 8:29 p.m. ET April 10, 2007

VIENNA, Austria - Is Iran bluffing about the progress of its nuclear program? Experts and some world powers are expressing doubt that the country has been able to assemble the complicated system it needs to enrich uranium — a potential pathway to nuclear arms.

If true, Iran’s revelation Monday that it now has 3,000 centrifuges producing enriched uranium brings the country a giant step closer to being able to produce the nuclear material for a bomb. But the inaccuracy of some past claims — and Iran’s present drive to defy the U.N. Security Council — has fed skepticism.

Experts say 3,000 centrifuges would be more than enough for at least one nuclear weapon a year should Iran decide to make bombs instead of its professed goal of generating power.

But Monday’s announcement could be at least partly bluff — the latest hand in Iran’s high-stakes game of nuclear poker with the international community that has led to U.N sanctions over its refusal to freeze enrichment.

With its nuclear activities shrouded in suspicions, Iran’s claims are difficult to independently verify. Exaggerating the number of centrifuges gives the Iranians more room to negotiate with world powers — and possibly allow them to hold out and keep some vestige of a nuclear enrichment program.

“This is a country that routinely lies about conventional weapons developments and production,” said Anthony Cordesman, an analyst with the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Mark Fitzpatrick, an Iran analyst at London’s International Institute for Strategic Studies, said the country’s announcement sounded like “a boast too far.” And nonproliferation expert Michael Levi at the Council for Foreign Relations cautioned, “We shouldn’t rush to judgments and take Iran at its word.”

What is known independently about the state of Iran’s enrichment program fuels the doubt.

Diplomats dispute claims
Diplomats in Vienna familiar with an International Atomic Energy Agency probe of Iran’s nuclear program said Tuesday it is far less advanced than how it was presented Monday by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani.

The diplomats told The Associated Press that Iran was running only about 650 centrifuges in series — the configuration that allows the machines to spin uranium gas to various levels of enrichment. And they said the machines were running empty, with none producing enriched uranium.

Russia and France — two of the six world powers pressuring Iran to give up enrichment — on Tuesday also expressed skepticism about the latest claims.

Russia, which helped build Iran’s only nuclear reactor, was unaware of “any recent technological breakthroughs in the Iranian nuclear program,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin said. And Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Russia had yet to get confirmation “that they have actually begun uranium enrichment.”

French Foreign Ministry spokesman Jean-Baptiste Mattei noted: “There are announcements, and then there is technological reality.”

A U.S. official, who requested anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media, said concern over the announcement was tinged with a “high degree of skepticism” in Washington that Iran “had attained all what they said they had.”

No photos to back up announcement
The Vienna-based diplomats — all of whom also demanded anonymity — noted that this time, unlike in the past, Iranian officials presented no photos to document their claims. Nor did they offer any other physical proof of their claims.

Iran has refused to allow IAEA cameras at Natanz intended to make sure no low-enriched uranium is diverted into making weapons-grade material. But diplomats said Tuesday the government may be ready to allow inspectors to stay near the facility, allowing more frequent unannounced visits.

Two U.N. inspectors arrived in Iran Tuesday to visit the Natanz plant, Iranian media reported.

But any such deal would be less than what the agency wants. The diplomats said it was unclear whether inspectors would be allowed access to all parts of the enrichment operation — including a walled-off section. And they said that — unlike remote cameras — the IAEA experts would not be able to constantly monitor operations.
© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

© 2007 MSNBC.com


Ahmadinejad ready for nuclear talks { May 2006 }
Cia says no proof of nuclear arms { October 2006 }
Cnn lied about iran nuclear ambitions
Eu considers france overseeing iran nuclear enrichment
EU upbeat after iran nuclear talks { June 2006 }
Iran allows inspectors before nuclear meeting { January 30 2006 }
Iran at least 5 yrs away from nukes says blix { March 2006 }
Iran begins small scale uranian enrichment { February 14 2006 }
Iran claims to enrich uranium for first time { March 2006 }
Iran denies secret nuclear sites { May 28 2003 }
Iran drive to nuclear fuel has slowed { May 29 2006 }
Iran exaggerating nuclear progress { April 12 2006 }
Iran invites US to share in power plant construction
Iran lack of nuclear progress worries west { December 2007 }
Iran may have halted nuclear program { February 2007 }
Iran minimum 9 years away from nuclear bomb
Iran nuclear threat contradicted { December 3 2007 }
Iran over 10 years from obtaining nuke { August 2 2005 }
Iran president says they dont need nuclear arms { January 14 2006 }
Iran ready for serious nuclear talks { July 2006 }
Iran says western nuke worries are big lie { May 10 2006 }
Iran sparked mideast atomic energy interest { May 20 2008 }
Iranians puzzled by nuclear accusations { September 8 2003 }
Jordan wants to develop nuclear power
Middle east following iran lead on nuclear energy { April 15 2007 }
Nations doubt iran nuclear progress { April 10 2007 }
No proof found of iran arms program { August 23 2005 }
Nuclear agency says no imminent threat { March 31 2006 }
Nuclear analysts say tehran far from nuclear capabilities { April 13 2006 }
Other arab states seek nuclear technology { November 4 2006 }
Pentagon says iran 5 years from nuclear bomb { August 31 2006 }
Russia threatens iran on nuclear payments { March 13 2007 }
Senior intelligence say iran nukes are decade away { April 13 2006 }
UN inspects iran nuclear sites after talks { June 2007 }
UN nuclear watchdog finds no iran nuclear threat
US iran intelligence is incorrect { February 22 2007 }

Files Listed: 36



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple