News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinewar-on-terroriraniran-nuclear-threat — Viewing Item


Iran ready for serious nuclear talks { July 2006 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-08-22T155449Z_01_BLA127291_RTRUKOC_0_US-NUCLEAR-IRAN.xml&WTmodLoc=NewsHome-C1-topNews-3

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-08-22T155449Z_01_BLA127291_RTRUKOC_0_US-NUCLEAR-IRAN.xml&WTmodLoc=NewsHome-C1-topNews-3

Iran says ready for serious nuclear talks
Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:55 AM ET


By Edmund Blair

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran handed over on Tuesday its formal response to a nuclear incentives offer from major powers and said it contained ideas that would allow serious talks about its standoff with the West to start immediately.

But Tehran gave no sign of heeding a key United Nations Security Council demand that it freeze uranium enrichment before the end of this month or face the prospect of sanctions.

Chief nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani delivered Iran's reply to the incentives package, handed to Iran almost three months ago, at a meeting with foreign envoys representing the offer's six co-sponsors in Tehran.

"Although there is no justification for the other parties' illegal move to refer Iran's case to the Security Council,... the answer was prepared ... to pave the way for fair talks," Larijani said.

"Iran is prepared to hold serious talks from August 23," he was quoted by Iran's student news agency ISNA as saying.

He said Iran was ready to play a "constructive" role regarding all issues in the package.

One European diplomat said: "It is a comprehensive answer. The Iranian side said they would welcome a continuation of negotiations."

The world's fourth largest oil exporter, Iran says it will not abandon what it calls its right to enrich uranium for use in nuclear power stations. Western countries fear Iran wants to master enrichment to give it the ability to make atomic bombs.

The U.N. Security Council -- frustrated with Iran's slow response to the incentives offer made by Britain, Germany, France, China, the United States and Russia in June -- has given it to August 31 to freeze enrichment or face possible sanctions.

Iran has called the deadline illegal and worthless.

The European diplomat, who was not at the meeting with Larijani but was citing an initial read out, said Iran had again ruled out freezing enrichment as a precondition to talks "but indicated that it might be open to accept suspension in the course of negotiations.

Other diplomats had no immediate comment on Iran's reply and declined to confirm that Larijani had indicated some flexibility on enrichment.

RICE STUDYING REPLY

The U.S. State Department declined any immediate comment on Iran's response until full details were known but an official said Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had returned from her vacation to examine Tehran's reply.

U.S. ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton, said Washington was prepared to move quickly on a resolution seeking economic sanctions should Tehran reject the offer of incentives, but it was unclear how speedily other council members wanted to move.

"It really is a test for the council and we will see how it responds," Bolton told reporters at U.N. headquarters.

The nuclear dispute erupted four years ago with revelations that Iran had been building an advanced atomic program in secret for almost two decades.

The five Security Council permanent members plus Germany have offered Iran a range of economic, political and security incentives to halt work that could be used to make atomic bombs.

Iran had said its reply to the offer would be "multi-dimensional", suggesting no simple 'yes' or 'no'.

Such tactics could lay bare divisions in the Council where the United States, France and Britain back sanctions but Russia and China, both key trade partners of Iran, oppose them.

"If they said suspension (of enrichment) was negotiable, there would be pressure on (the six powers) to think about it," said a Western diplomat.

Analysts say Iran is probably calculating that any move toward sanctions would start with modest steps, such as travel bans on officials or asset freezes, which it could tolerate because the country's coffers are brimming with petrodollars.

Diplomats close to the U.N. nuclear watchdog said its inspectors were recently denied access to an underground site where Iran plans industrial-scale production of enriched uranium. Iran denied hindering access to the Natanz facility.

(Additional reporting by Parisa Hafezi, Alireza Ronaghi in Tehran, Mark Heinrich in Vienna, Rebecca Harrison in Johannesburg, Irwin Arieff in New York, Sue Pleming in Washington)

© Reuters 2006.


Ahmadinejad ready for nuclear talks { May 2006 }
Cia says no proof of nuclear arms { October 2006 }
Cnn lied about iran nuclear ambitions
Eu considers france overseeing iran nuclear enrichment
EU upbeat after iran nuclear talks { June 2006 }
Iran allows inspectors before nuclear meeting { January 30 2006 }
Iran at least 5 yrs away from nukes says blix { March 2006 }
Iran begins small scale uranian enrichment { February 14 2006 }
Iran claims to enrich uranium for first time { March 2006 }
Iran denies secret nuclear sites { May 28 2003 }
Iran drive to nuclear fuel has slowed { May 29 2006 }
Iran exaggerating nuclear progress { April 12 2006 }
Iran invites US to share in power plant construction
Iran lack of nuclear progress worries west { December 2007 }
Iran may have halted nuclear program { February 2007 }
Iran minimum 9 years away from nuclear bomb
Iran nuclear threat contradicted { December 3 2007 }
Iran over 10 years from obtaining nuke { August 2 2005 }
Iran president says they dont need nuclear arms { January 14 2006 }
Iran ready for serious nuclear talks { July 2006 }
Iran says western nuke worries are big lie { May 10 2006 }
Iran sparked mideast atomic energy interest { May 20 2008 }
Iranians puzzled by nuclear accusations { September 8 2003 }
Jordan wants to develop nuclear power
Middle east following iran lead on nuclear energy { April 15 2007 }
Nations doubt iran nuclear progress { April 10 2007 }
No proof found of iran arms program { August 23 2005 }
Nuclear agency says no imminent threat { March 31 2006 }
Nuclear analysts say tehran far from nuclear capabilities { April 13 2006 }
Other arab states seek nuclear technology { November 4 2006 }
Pentagon says iran 5 years from nuclear bomb { August 31 2006 }
Russia threatens iran on nuclear payments { March 13 2007 }
Senior intelligence say iran nukes are decade away { April 13 2006 }
UN inspects iran nuclear sites after talks { June 2007 }
UN nuclear watchdog finds no iran nuclear threat
US iran intelligence is incorrect { February 22 2007 }

Files Listed: 36



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple