NewsMine — nature-health — livestock — madcow — Viewing Item

Possible new case of mad cow disease Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://apnews.myway.com/article/20041118/D86ECRFO0.html http://apnews.myway.com/article/20041118/D86ECRFO0.html Possible New Case of Mad Cow Disease Found Nov 18, 11:28 AM (ET) By JOHN HEILPRIN WASHINGTON (AP) - A second case of mad cow disease may have turned up in the United States but the suspect meat has not entered the food chain, Agriculture Department officials said Thursday. The officials released few details and refused to say where the possibly diseased animal was found. They said it would be four to seven days before more could be confirmed, a delay that livestock industry representatives said would cause turmoil in the beef market. Mad cow disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy, attacks an animal's nervous system. People who eat food contaminated with BSE can contract a rare disease that is nearly always fatal, variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. The possible case comes 11 months after the United States had its first case of mad cow disease. Japan and other countries are still maintaining bans against U.S. beef as the result of the earlier case. Suspicions about another case of the disease came because of an inconclusive test result, officials said. "The inconclusive result does not mean we have found another case of BSE in this country," said Andrea Morgan, associate deputy administrator of the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. She said the inconclusive results "are a normal component of screening tests, which are designed to be extremely sensitive so they will detect any sample that could possibly be positive." "It is important to note that this animal did not enter the food or feed chain," Morgan said. "USDA remains confident in the safety of the U.S. beef supply. Our ban on specified risk materials from the human food chain provides the protection to public health, should another case of BSE ever be detected in the United States." Morgan said initial efforts had begun to trace back the animal from where it was tested to the farm from which it originated. The wait to find out more about this possible new case of BSE has "put the entire industry really in limbo," said John McBride, a spokesman for the Livestock Marketing Association, based in Kansas City, Mo. "With final results not being available for four to seven days, it's going to disrupt the livestock market. Buyers are going to be reluctant to buy, sellers are going to be reluctant to put their livestock on the market," he said. "The effect on the market could be profound. Officials at the Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board, which is based in Centennial, Colo., and monitors consumer perceptions and attitudes, had no immediate comment. Just before the start of the July Fourth weekend, the department had announced two other possible cases of the brain-wasting illness in the United States - but then said follow-up testing had proved negative. Both were subjected to the more definitive testing after initial screenings for infection were inconclusive. Thousands of animals have been tested under new screening procedures that took effect June 1 to address complaints that too few animals in the United States are tested for the disease. The mad cow screening programs used by the government were developed by Bio-Rad Laboratories of Hercules, Calif., and have been used in Europe for a number of years. In the only confirmed U.S. case, a Canadian-born Holstein was found to have been infected, but just that one case caused Japan and more than three dozen other countries to refuse U.S. beef. That hurt U.S. export sales and the farm economy. Bush administration officials are now focused on trying to get those bans lifted and with establishing a national identification system for tracking livestock and poultry from birth through the production chain. Such a system has worried producers who prefer to keep their records confidential or run a voluntary ID clearinghouse that would provide government officials with limited access. --- On the Net: U.S. Department of Agriculture: http://www.usda.gov

300 cases a year of CJD in america Alabama cow tests positive for disease { March 13 2006 } Briton from houston has mad cow disease Bush wants mad cow testing to stop { May 9 2008 } Canada cows mad cow quarantine Canada mad cow animal may have reached US Canada shock wave madcow { May 20 2003 } Canadian madcow Cow destroyed before tested for madcow { May 3 2004 } Dispute of condition of washington mad cow Fda proposed banning brains from animal feed { October 5 2005 } Feds investigated 20 cases for human mad cow Florida women died of mad cow disease Human variant mad cow is puzzle { January 3 2004 } Inspector general details flaws in madcow testing { July 15 2004 } Mad cow disease found in goat { January 28 2005 } Mad cow dog food recalled { May 27 2003 } Mad cow may be affecting more humans Mad cow texas { January 26 2001 } Madcow maybe from us More us cattle likely to have mad cow disease { February 5 2004 } Mysterious mad cow cases found texas alabama { June 12 2006 } Natural beef sales outpace conventional beef Plants violating mad cow rules Possible new case of mad cow disease Reports possible case of madcow disease { November 18 2004 } Study finds broader reach for mad cow proteins { January 21 2005 } Suspected case of mad cow { June 12 2005 } Testing for mad cow to end after third case found Tests confirm second mad cow case { June 25 2005 } Tests if texas death linked to mad cow disease Third us herd quarantined in madcow investigation Upto 100 more mad cow cases expected Us may pay farmers to test for madcow { January 2 2004 } Usad investigates third possible mad cow Usda not testing animals at risk for madcow Usda probes 3rd case of mad cow { July 27 2005 } Usda says mad cow probe could take months Usda scales back mad cow testing { June 2006 } Files Listed: 39

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.