News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinenature-healthlivestockmadcow — Viewing Item


Fda proposed banning brains from animal feed { October 5 2005 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/05/health/05cow.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/05/health/05cow.html

October 5, 2005
To Prevent Mad Cow Disease, F.D.A. Proposes New Restrictions on Food for Animals
By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.

The Food and Drug Administration proposed new rules yesterday to prevent the spread of mad cow disease by banning brains and spinal cords from older cows in all animal feed.

"This reduces a very, very low risk to even lower," said Dr. Stephen F. Sundlof, the agency's director of veterinary medicine, in announcing the changes.

But the rules are not as strict as those the agency proposed last year and never adopted, and critics promptly denounced them as inadequate.

The new proposal still allows chickens, pigs and other noncattle animals to be fed material that some scientists consider potentially infectious, including the brains and spinal cords of young animals, and the eyes, tonsils, intestines and nerves of older ones.

Cows can potentially ingest that material because they can be given chicken feed and droppings swept up from the floors of poultry farms, scrapings from restaurant plates, and a calf milk replacement made from cow blood and fat. In the rules proposed in early 2004, poultry litter and plate waste would have been banned.

The F.D.A. and the meat industry are "totally committed to continuing the practice of feeding slaughterhouse waste to cows," said John Stauber, the author of "Mad Cow U.S.A." (1997) and a critic of the meat industry who has called for a ban on feeding all animal protein to livestock.

The major meat processors that also own rendering plants, Mr. Stauber said, want to keep exporting cheap protein or feeding it to their own animals and have lobbied hard to keep the right to do so.

Michael K. Hansen, an expert on prion diseases at the Consumers Union, called the new proposed rules "completely inadequate." Britain, he said, "took many halfway steps in their efforts to eliminate mad cow disease and failed to stop it," and managed only to cut new cases to the low current levels by eliminating all mammal protein in the foodstuff of animals used for food.

Dr. Sundlof, of the F.D.A., said removing the brains and spinal cords of older cattle would remove 90 percent of potentially infectious matter from all animal feed.

Since June 2004, he said, the United States Department of Agriculture has tested 484,000 cattle for the disease, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, and only one animal born in the United States has tested positive.

His agency, he said, also considered the cost to industry. Getting rid of just brains and spines from older cattle, he said, would create only 64 million pounds of waste that renderers would have to burn or bury, and would cost only about $14 million.

Getting rid of the vertebrae, spines, spinal nerves, eyes, intestines and other potentially infectious parts of all cattle - including the meat that nerves remain attached to - would create more than two billion pounds of waste, which he said would be an environmental problem and a big expense for the industry.

Tom Cook, president of the National Renderers Association, said he was disappointed by the F.D.A.'s proposal to ban brain or spinal cord from animals not seen by meat inspectors.

Renderers typically pick up dead or dying animals from farms for about $25, he explained, strip off the hide and cook all the rest down into meal and fat to be sold as animal food or even for paint or linoleum.

A slaughterhouse can split a fresh carcass and vacuum out the soft brain and spinal cord, he said, but renderers pick up animals that are bloated or in rigor mortis. The extra costs of removing organs "may take away the economic incentive," he said, "and carcasses will be disposed of illegally."

In 1997, the F.D.A. banned feeding ruminants like cattle and sheep to other cattle and sheep, with a few exceptions like calf "milk replacement" made from cow blood.

But the ban is widely acknowledged to be imperfect. Some farmers deliberately or accidentally give their cows ruminant feed. Equipment used by rendering plants processes both ruminant and nonruminant feed, which can mix.

The rules proposed yesterday, Dr. Sundlof said, will not be adopted until sometime next year, after a comment period ends on Dec. 19.



Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company


300 cases a year of CJD in america
Alabama cow tests positive for disease { March 13 2006 }
Briton from houston has mad cow disease
Bush wants mad cow testing to stop { May 9 2008 }
Canada cows mad cow quarantine
Canada mad cow animal may have reached US
Canada shock wave madcow { May 20 2003 }
Canadian madcow
Cow destroyed before tested for madcow { May 3 2004 }
Dispute of condition of washington mad cow
Fda proposed banning brains from animal feed { October 5 2005 }
Feds investigated 20 cases for human mad cow
Florida women died of mad cow disease
Human variant mad cow is puzzle { January 3 2004 }
Inspector general details flaws in madcow testing { July 15 2004 }
Mad cow disease found in goat { January 28 2005 }
Mad cow dog food recalled { May 27 2003 }
Mad cow may be affecting more humans
Mad cow texas { January 26 2001 }
Madcow maybe from us
More us cattle likely to have mad cow disease { February 5 2004 }
Mysterious mad cow cases found texas alabama { June 12 2006 }
Natural beef sales outpace conventional beef
Plants violating mad cow rules
Possible new case of mad cow disease
Reports possible case of madcow disease { November 18 2004 }
Study finds broader reach for mad cow proteins { January 21 2005 }
Suspected case of mad cow { June 12 2005 }
Testing for mad cow to end after third case found
Tests confirm second mad cow case { June 25 2005 }
Tests if texas death linked to mad cow disease
Third us herd quarantined in madcow investigation
Upto 100 more mad cow cases expected
Us may pay farmers to test for madcow { January 2 2004 }
Usad investigates third possible mad cow
Usda not testing animals at risk for madcow
Usda probes 3rd case of mad cow { July 27 2005 }
Usda says mad cow probe could take months
Usda scales back mad cow testing { June 2006 }

Files Listed: 39



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple