News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page
NewsMine cabal-elite w-administration evangelicals-zionists zionist Viewing Item | Wexner analysis israel behind iraq war >The document, entitled "Wexner Analysis: Israeli Communication > >Priorities 2003," counsels pro-Israel advocates to keep invoking the > >name of Saddam Hussein, and to stress that Israel "was always behind > >American efforts to rid the world of this ruthless dictator and > >liberate their people." Despite his solid support for Israel and Ariel > >Sharon, the document warns pro-Israel advocates not to compliment or > >praise President Bush. At the same time it acknowledges that Yasser > >Arafat has been a great asset to Israel because "he looks the part" of > >a "terrorist." The installation of Mahmoud Abbas as Palestinian prime > >minister, and potential replacement for Arafat, comes "at the wrong > >time," because he has the potential to improve the image of the > >Palestinians, and that could put the onus on Israel to return to > >negotiations. The document advises supporters of Israel to appear to > >affect a "balanced" tone, but admits that in arguing for Israel's > >policies, the illegal "settlements are our Achilles heel," for which > >there is no good defense. > > > >The document was commissioned by the Wexner Foundation, a private > >foundation that funds, among other pro-Israel initiatives, "Birthright > >Israel," a program that pays for young American Jews to take free > >trips to Israel. The Israel Project is an initiative of pro-Israel > >organizations, political consultants and businesspeople. The Luntz > >Research Companies is a leading public relations and opinion research > >firm. > > > >Here is some of the key advice the document provides to Israel and its > >advocates: > > > >. "Iraq colors all. Saddam is your best defense, even if he is > >dead. The worldview [of] Americans is entirely dominated by > >developments in Iraq. This is a unique opportunity for Israelis to > >deliver a message of support and unity at a time of great > >international anxiety and opposition from some of our European > >"allies." For a year - a SOLID YEAR - you should be invoking the name > >of Saddam Hussein and how Israel was always behind American efforts to > >rid the world of this ruthless dictator and liberate their people." > > > >. "The fact that Israel has remained relatively silent for the > >three months preceding the war and for the three weeks of the war was > >absolutely the correct strategy - and according to all the polling > >done, it worked. But as the military conflict comes to a close, it is > >now time for Israel to lay out its own "road map" for the future which > >includes unqualified support for America and unqualified commitment to > >an ongoing war against terrorism." > > > >. "It DOES NOT HELP when you compliment President Bush. When > >you want to identify with and align yourself with America, just say > >it. Don't use George Bush as a synonym for the United States. Even > >with the destruction of the Hussein regime and all the positive > >reactions from the Iraqi people, there still remains about 20% of > >America that opposes the Iraqi war, and they are overwhelmingly > >Democrat. That leaves about half the Democrats who support the war > >even if they don't support George Bush. You antagonize the latter half > >unnecessarily every time you compliment the President. Don't do it." > > > >. "SECURITY" sells. Security has become the key fundamental > >principle for all Americans. Security is the context by which you > >should explain Israeli need for loan guarantees and military aid, as > >well as why Israel can't just give up land. The settlements are our > >Achilles heel, and the best response (which is still quite weak) is > >the need for security that this buffer creates." > >
|
| Files Listed: 46 |
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information,
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|