NewsMine — cabal-elite — w-administration — big-government — no-child-left-behind — Viewing Item

Connecticut challenges no child left behind Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/11318452.htm http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/11318452.htm Posted on Wed, Apr. 06, 2005 No Child Left Behind lawsuit ahead State will challenge federal mandate The Associated Press HARTFORD, Conn. — Connecticut is preparing a lawsuit to challenge President Bush's No Child Left Behind education law, becoming the first state to challenge the federal mandate in court. Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said Tuesday the federal lawsuit will contend that the law illegally and unconstitutionally requires states and communities to spend millions more than the federal government provides for test development and school reform programs. Although other states have questioned the law and asked the federal government and Congress to make changes, they have not gone to court. Blumenthal said he anticipates that other states will join his lawsuit. Signed in 2002, the law's aim is to have all students in public schools proficient in reading and math by 2014. Earlier Tuesday, administration officials said that Education Secretary Margaret Spellings planned to fundamentally change enforcement of the law, giving preferential treatment to states that prove they are serious about raising achievement, the officials say. For example, the Education Department plans to give some states more freedom in how they test hundreds of thousands of children with milder disabilities. But only states that can prove progress or a strong commitment to improve will be seriously considered for that flexibility, administration officials told The Associated Press on Tuesday. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity.

After teachers more expensive suits like nclb All child recruited { November 12 2002 } Bush leaves children behind Bush warns against watering down nclb { March 3 2007 } Charter schools lag behind in test scores { August 17 2004 } Companies help no child left behind Connecticut challenges no child left behind Connecticut sues federal government over nclb { August 23 2005 } Dc school vouchers win final aproval { January 23 2004 } Districts and teachers union sue over bush law { April 21 2005 } Education law haunts state where law began { April 9 2005 } Federal law requires commercial provider Growing concern that schools leave arts behind { July 12 2004 } Helpding or hindering the real deal on nclb { March 9 2004 } Highschool students taking more advanced coursework Hillary says teach to the nclb tests { July 2 2007 } Idahoans balk at no child left behind { March 8 2004 } Kids 6 years old tested and tested and tested in school Languages social studies left behind Leave no child make em vanish Military recruiters schools { November 21 2002 } Nclb law comes under fire in arizona Nclb requires private companies { May 30 2003 } Nclb to turn public education to private industry Neil bush banks on education { March 12 2004 } Neil bush profits from no child left behind No child goals out of reach { September 16 2003 } No child law is unconstitutional says panel { February 24 2005 } No child left behind acid tests No child left behind act draws fire from states No child left behind ignores lowest performers { March 4 2007 } No child left behind law comes under fire in arizona No child left behind leaving states cold No child left funded Oklahoma resolution overhaul no child left behind { March 9 2004 } Spellings promised flexibility to committed states State educators decry rules for no child left behind { January 27 2005 } States left with 29b bill for unfunded programs States rebelling against no child left behind { February 17 2004 } Virginia schools spend 61m extra for bush law { September 22 2005 } Virginia snubs no child left behind { January 20 2005 } Files Listed: 41

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.