News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinecabal-eliteglobalizationwto — Viewing Item


Eu warns against tax breaks microsoft caterpiller { November 6 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1066565669756

http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1066565669756

EU takes cautious step towards trade sanctions on US over tax breaks
By Tobias Buck in Brussels
Published: November 6 2003 4:00 | Last Updated: November 6 2003 4:00

The European Commission yesterday moved one step closer to imposing trade sanctions on the US in a long-running dispute over tax breaks for US exporters, but gave Washington additional breathing space to comply with its demands.

Sanctions would be imposed only from March next year and the value of the punitive import tariffs would fall below the $4bn (&euro3.5bn, £2.4bn) the European Union was empowered to levy by the World Trade Organisation.

This cautious approach reflects widespread fears that a more aggressive stance could seriously damage US-EU trade relations and the international trading system in general.

Pascal Lamy, EU trade commissioner, said: "We have opted for a measured approach and have actually left the door open for US action before countermeasures are to be applied in March 2004. I hope the US will seize this opportunity."

The WTO ruled last year that the US Foreign Sales Corporations provision, which benefits companies such as Boeing, Caterpillar and Microsoft, was illegal, and subsequently allowed the EU to impose sanctions worth $4bn if the US failed to comply with its decision.

Brussels has since urged the US to repeal the provision, but despite efforts in the US Senate and the House of Representatives to change the legislation, the US has still failed to do so.

In an attempt to "focus the minds in the US", as one Commission official put it, Brussels yesterday backed a plan setting out how and when the sanctions would be implemented. Crucially, the EU will only begin levying punitive import tariffs on US goods from March next year, giving Washington lawmakers more time to repeal the provision.

In addition, the EU plans to introduce the tariffs at a level of only 5 per cent, which would then be raised by one percentage point every month up to a ceiling of 17 per cent in March 2005. This means that the overall value of the sanctions would reach only &euro290m ($332m, £199m) in the first year and &euro614m in the second - a fraction of the $4bn the EU is entitled to.

The plan, which still needs to be approved by EU member states, was criticised by Rockwell Schnabel, US ambassador to the European Union. Reuters news agency reported him as telling a lunchtime meeting in Brussels that the EU approach was unhelpful and he reiterated that any changes to the provision should only be phased in over three years - a solution the EU has said is unacceptable.

"Something is going to happen [in Congress] so at this stage to retaliate, we think, is counter-productive," he said.

Even if the US manages to repeal the provision in time, the two sides face an uphill struggle to stave off the threat of an escalation in another long-running trade dispute over US steel tariffs. Mr Lamy said in Washington this week that EU retaliation in this case was a "racing certainty" if the US did not comply with a WTO ruling by mid-December.

In the steel case, the EU won the right to impose punitive import tariffs worth $2.2bn.




sept-2003
Airbus and boeing fight at wto
America challenges gm crop ban { May 14 2003 }
Brazil wants bigger eu farm concessions
Brussels gives us notice of 1bn trade war { November 6 2003 }
Buchanan speak wto protests
Bush refuses to lift sugar tariff on brazil
Byrd says fight ruling { January 17 2003 }
China promises to punish US on wto complaints { April 10 2007 }
Dec 18 wto protests [jpg]
Developing eight nations urge iran wto membership { May 13 2006 }
Eu and japan win trade sanctions for import duties { November 26 2004 }
Eu gives sanctions ok { August 30 2002 }
Eu sanctions deadline us tax dispute { May 8 2003 }
Eu warns against tax breaks microsoft caterpiller { November 6 2003 }
Europe impose sanctions { August 30 2002 }
Famers protest wealth nation policies { December 13 2005 }
India says wto needs transparency
New wto deal on farm trade
Protesters battling police hit wto center
Russia to join WTO in talks with US { October 2006 }
Saudi arabia becomes wto 149 member
Skorea protesters wto dec 13 05 [jpg]
Steel workers oppose wto { March 27 2003 }
Thousands protest wto in hong kong { November 2005 }
Trade talks fail over impasse on farm tariffs { July 25 2006 }
US adds tariffs against china subsidies { February 2007 }
Us demands wto finds eu gm ban illegal
US exempts itself from WTO for online gambling { November 2007 }
Us files first wto complaint against china
Us seeks end eu biotech moratorium
Us wto against eu genetically modified food { May 12 2003 }
Vietnam wishes to join world trade organization { June 19 2005 }
Wto agrees 6b us sanctions { May 8 2003 }
Wto drug pact { August 27 2003 }
Wto is tool of globalists
Wto official says nations held back
Wto opens talks with libya
Wto overturns japan steel tarrif complaint { August 14 2003 }
Wto protesters clash with riot police { December 13 2005 }
Wto rules against us farm subsidies
Wto rules in favor of third world agriculture
WTO rules US goods illegally subsidized
Wto steel tarrifs
Wto talks drug deal
Wto trade deal for farm exports { November 2005 }

Files Listed: 45



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple