News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinecabal-eliteelection-fraudelectronic2004-primaries — Viewing Item


Computer voting snafus plague california

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/36146.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/36146.html

Computer voting snafus plague California
By Thomas C Greene in Washington
Posted: 10/03/2004 at 11:14 GMT
The Register Mobile: Find out what the fuss is about. Take the two week trial today.


Bizarre election results in California have been traced to an electronic touch-screen ballot system. But no one is quite sure what went wrong, and because there is no paper trail, no one is ever likely to get to the bottom of it.

In several Orange County precincts last week, more ballots were cast than the number of registered voters can account for, the LA Times reports.

Around 5,500 citizens appear to have unwittingly cast votes in the wrong districts, out of a total of 7,000 who experienced some manner of snafu, the newspaper reckons.

The unlikely number of ballots cast in certain precincts alerted officials to the difficulties. This does not mean that less obvious errors did not occur at the same time. But at least, in those areas where the ballots cast exceeded voter turnout, it is known that some manner of snafu occurred.

A spokesman for the voting system manufacturer hastened to make a virtue of the bungling: "David Hart, chairman of Texas-based Hart InterCivic, which manufactured Orange County's voting system, said it would be impossible to identify which voters cast ballots in the wrong precincts because of steps the company had taken to ensure voter secrecy. For this reason, an exact account of miscast ballots is impossible," the LA Times says.

Fortunately, the discrepancies - at least those that have been detected - are too slight to have influenced the outcomes of any elections. However, had any of the races been close, Orange County would have found itself in the awkward position of knowing that an election is doubtful, and having no hope of sorting it out.

Since a paper recount is impossible with the majority of these machines, one has to wonder if touch-screen voting might eventually inspire nostalgia for the hanging chads, political wrangling and mass confusion that propelled George W Bush into the Oval Office. The old system may have been a nasty business, but at least we know what went wrong with it.




134 votes in florida not counted
California orange co supervisor wants audit 7000 flawed votes { March 10 2004 }
California voting methods prompt debate { March 2 2004 }
Computer voting snafus plague california
Emachines drop ballots
Es&s project manager fired { March 4 2004 }
Interview with es&s executive
Investigation into es&s glitches
Investigation will your vote count
Many states now using evoting { March 2 2004 }
Ohio contracts for electronic voting machines
Poll workers cite confusions poor training { March 7 2004 }
Republican county commissioner has concerns { March 4 2004 }
San bernardino county blames human error for delay { March 3 2004 }
San jose technical problems reported { March 2 2004 }
Scared of diebold vanderburgh county uses es&s
Smart cards bring other problems
Voted in md or not { March 7 2004 }

Files Listed: 18



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple