News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page
NewsMine — 9-11 — questions — israelis — Viewing Item |
Cia mossad operations { September 27 2001 } [Fwd: WTC-Pentagon: A CIA/MOSSAD Operation?] (fwd)
Subject: [Fwd: WTC-Pentagon: A CIA/MOSSAD Operation?]
>
>La Voz de Aztlan
>Los Angeles, Alta California
>September 27, 2001
>
>Dear La Voz de Aztlan Subscribers:
>
>We have been carefully covering the tragedy
>that occurred in New York and Washington
>since we first sent out three "News Bulletins"
>to you as the events were actually happening.
>As the events unfolded and specially as the
>news coverage by the mainstream media
>evolved, we could not help sensing that
>"something" was amiss concerning the way the
>public was being "guided" to a consensus on the
>question as to who may be behind the terrorist
>attacks. We now suspect that CNN is essentially
>a tool of the CIA/MOSSAD apparatus because of
>the way they started disseminating
>disinformation that was picked up by ABC, CBS
>and NBC Television Networks. We now have a
>strong opinion that most Americans have been had.
>
>Our staff is well traveled and acquainted with
>the contemporary geopolitical realities. We have
>an understanding of the Middle East Crisis, the
>history of Israel, the U.S. deep dependence on
>Middle East oil and of the ties of the Bush
>family to petroleum interests. There have been
>many pundits of disinformation that have been
>attempting to explain things to us. We have not
>bought any of it.
>
>Today we received the following article by a
>"dean of world journalism" Arnaud
>De Borchgrave. Mr. De Borchgrave is presently
>the United Press International Editor at
>Large and has had a distinguished career in
>journalism. At 75, De Borchgrave has been
>around the world and back, becoming an expert in
>many fields. The Belgium native served four
>years in the British Royal Navy and went on to
>become Newsweek's bureau chief in Paris, then
>chief European correspondent for the magazine.
>At age 27, he became Newsweek's senior editor,
>working there for 25 years. In 1985 he was
>appointed editor-in-chief of The Washington
>Times and Insight magazine, a position he left
>in 1991. He has impeccable journalism
>credentials and he is providing us information
>that you will definitely not hear on television
>tonight. The following article and it's
>explanation of events makes a lot of sense to
>La Voz de Aztlan. The article was written by
>Mr. De Borchgrave after a 90 minute interview of
>the ex-Chief of Intelligence of Pakistan, General
>Hameed Gul. The actual transcript of the
>interview follows the article. As young men and
>women of America are being called to die for the
>country, it is important to know why they will
>give their lives:
>
>------------------------------------------------
>
>Wednesday, 26 September 2001
>
>Pakistan's ex-spy chief blames Mossad
>
>By ARNAUD DE BORCHGRAVE
>UPI Editor at Large
>
>RAWALPINDI, Pakistan, Sept. 26 (UPI) -- The Sept.
>11 terrorist attacks on the United States were
>perpetrated by renegade U.S. Air Force elements
>working in conjunction with Mossad, the Israeli
>intelligence service, according to the retired
>Pakistani general who is closest to the Taliban
>and Osama bin Laden.
>
>Gen. Hameed Gul, head of Inter Services
>Intelligence, the equivalent of a CIA-cum-FBI
>combination, during the war against the Soviet
>occupation of Afghanistan, spent two weeks in
>the war-torn country immediately prior to Sept.
>11. He has been acting as "strategic adviser" to
>Pakistan's extremist religious political parties.
>Four religious leaders left his house in the
>army's principal garrison town as this reporter
>arrived at 9:30 p.m. Tuesday. The interview
>lasted 90 minutes.
>
>Already countless millions of Muslims believe
>that the World Trade Center and Pentagon suicide
>attacks were part of a Mossad plot to force the
>United States into confrontation with the Muslim
>world. Now Gul has added a new disinformation
>wrinkle to the plot. And what Gul says or writes
>is taken at face value by religious leaders and
>is repeated in thousands of mosques at Friday
>prayers.
>
> In an exclusive interview with United Press
> International, the fundamentalist general said
> it is now clear that there was also a plot by
> U.S. Air Force officers against the Pentagon.
>
> "The twin towers were first attacked at 8:45
> a.m.," he said, "and four flights were diverted
> from their assigned air space, and yet Air
> Force jets didn't scramble until 10 a.m. That
> smacks of a small-scale Air Force rebellion, a
> coup attempt against the Pentagon perhaps?
> Radars are jammed, transponders fail. No IFF --
> friend or foe identification -- challenge ...
> This was clearly an inside job. (President)
> Bush was afraid and rushed to the shelter of a
> nuclear bunker.
>
>"(Bush) clearly feared a nuclear situation. Who
>could that have been? Will that also be hushed
>up in the investigation, like the Warren report
>after the Kennedy assassination?"
>
>Gul said that his friend bin Laden had sworn to
>him on the Koran that he was not involved.
>
>"From a cave inside a mountain or a peasant's
>hovel," Gul asked, how could bin Laden mount
>such a sophisticated operation? "Let's be
>serious," he said with a smile. "Mossad and its
>American associates are the obvious culprits,"
>he added by asking, "Who benefits from the crime?"
>
>Asked why Israel would benefit, Gul replied,
>"Israel knows it has a short shelf-life before
>it is overwhelmed by demographics (and it) has
>now handed the (Bush administration) the
>opportunity it has been waiting for to
>consolidate America's imperial grip on the Gulf
>and acquire control of the Caspian basin by
>extending its military presence in Central Asia."
>
>Gul said the U.S. plan was "the destabilization
>of Pakistan because it is a Muslim nuclear state.
>The U.S. wants to isolate Pakistan from China as
>part of its containment policy. President
>Nixon's book 'The Real War' said China would be
>the superpower of the 21st century. The U.S. is
>also creating hostility between Pakistan and
>Afghanistan, two Muslim states, to reverse the
>perception that the Islamic world now has its
>own nuclear weapons. Bush 43 doesn't realize he
>is being manipulated by people who understand
>geopolitics. He is not leading but being led.
>All he can do is think in terms of the
>wanted-dead-or-alive culture which is how
>Hollywood conditions the masses to think and act."
>
>"Bush 43" is actually Washington shorthand for
>distinguishing President George W. Bush from his
>father. President George W. Bush is the 43rd
>president: George Bush Sr. was the 41st.
>
>Gul admitted that he turned against America when
>the United States walked away from Afghanistan
>following the Soviet withdrawal in 1989.
>
>"We were all pro-American (during the war) but
>then America left us in the lurch and everything
>went to pieces, including Afghanistan."
>
>Asked if the United States was now his enemy,
>Gul replied, "Is the U.S. national interest in
>contradiction with the Muslim world? The U.S.
>needs oil, as do its European allies. You have
>between 6 and 8 million American Muslims and
>their ranks are growing. About the same number
>in Europe. Israel aside, we are America's
>natural allies. Professor Sam Huntington in his
>(book) 'Clash of Civilizations' puts Confucius
>and Judeo-Christians in one corner, and us in
>the other. His prescription is wrong but is
>being adopted by Bush 43 who has now put 60
>countries on his hit list. This is the
>diabolical school that wants to launch an
>anti-Muslim 'crusade.' Muslims understood what
>Bush meant when he used that word. We need a
>meeting, not a clash, of civilizations."
>
>If Pakistan gives the U.S. base facilities, Gul
>warned, "we will have a national upheaval" and
>if the United States attacks Afghanistan, there
>will be "a general jihad (holy war) ... and
>Pakistan will be engulfed in the firestorm. So I
>can only hope that cooler heads will prevail in
>Washington."
>
>Asked to consider the possibility that bin Laden
>-- or OBL as he is referred to in Pakistani
>conversations -- was lying to him and is indeed
>guilty as charged by the United States, Gul said,
>"If Taliban are given irrefutable evidence of
>his guilt, I am in favor of a fair trial. In
>America one is entitled to a jury of peers. But
>he has no American peers. The Taliban would not
>object, in the event of a prima face case, to an
>international Islamic court meeting in The Hague.
>They would extradite Osama to the Netherlands."
>
>--
>
>UPI Interview with General Hameed Gul
>
>Wednesday, 26 September 2001 17:31 (ET)
>
>UPI Interview with Gen. Hameed Gul By ARNAUD de
>BORCHGRAVE
>
> (EXCLUSIVE)
>
> RAWALPINDI, Pakistan, Sept. 26 (UPI) -- The
> retired Pakistani general who is closest to the
> Taliban and Osama bin Laden contends the Sept.
> 11 terrorist attacks on New York City and
> Washington were the work of renegade U.S. Air
> Force elements working with the Israelis. Gen.
> Hameed Gul led Pakistan's Inter Services
> Intelligence during the war against the Soviet
> occupation of Afghanistan. Gul serves as an
> adviser to Pakistan's extremist religious
> political parties, which oppose their
> government's decision to support the United
> States in any action against Afghanistan's
> Taliban regime. Gul contends bin Laden had
> nothing to do with the terrorist attacks on New
> York and Washington, saying instead that they
> were the work of the Mossad, the Israeli
> intelligence service -- a version of events
> that has been endorsed by Islamic
> fundamentalist clerics and is widely accepted
> by Muslims throughout the Arab world.
>
> Here is the transcript of the exclusive
> interview Gul gave to Arnaud de Borchgrave,
> United Press International editor at large:
>
> --
>
> De Borchgrave: So who did Black Sept. 11?
>
> Gul: Mossad and its accomplices. The U.S.
> spends $40 billion a year on its 11
> intelligence agencies. That's $400 billion in
> 10 years. Yet the Bush Administration says it
> was taken by surprise. I don't believe it.
> Within 10 minutes of the second twin tower
> being hit in the World Trade Center ... CNN
> said Osama bin Laden had done it. That was a
> planned piece of disinformation by the real
> perpetrators. It created an instant mindset and
> put public opinion into a trance, which
> prevented even intelligent people from thinking
> for themselves.
>
>--
>
> Q: So you're already convinced bin Laden didn't
> do it?
>
> A: I know bin Laden and his associates. I've
> been with them here, in Europe and the Middle
> East. They are graduates of the best
> universities and are highly intelligent with
> impressive degrees and speak impeccable English.
> These are people who have rediscovered
> fundamental Islamic values. Many come from the
> Gulf countries where ruling royal families have
> generated hatred by the way they flout divine
> law, wasting billions on gratifying their whims,
> jetting around in large private jets by
> themselves, and sailing the Mediterranean in
> big private boats for weeks on end. Osama's
> best recruits come from feudal areas that are
> U.S. protectorates and where millions of poor
> people are seeking human dignity. I have even
> visited a Christian convent school in Murree,
> 60 miles from here, where my 13-year-old
> daughter is studying. The young girls there
> have told me Osama is their hero. Osama's
> followers identify with Mujahideen freedom
> fighters wherever they are defending Islam and
> its values.
>
> --
>
> Q: So what makes you think Osama wasn't behind
> Sept. 11?
>
> A: From a cave inside a mountain or a peasant's
> hovel? Let's be serious. Osama inspires
> countless millions by standing up for Islam
> against American and Israeli imperialism. He
> doesn't have the means for such a sophisticated
> operation.
>
> --
>
> Q: Why Mossad?
>
> A: Mossad and its American associates are the
> obvious culprits. Who benefits from the crime?
> The attacks against the twin towers started at
> 8:45 a.m. and four flights are diverted from
> their assigned air space and no air traffic
> controller sounds the alarm. And no Air Force
> jets scramble until 10 a.m. That also smacks of
> a small scale Air Force rebellion, a coup
> against the Pentagon perhaps? Radars are jammed,
> transponders fail. No IFF -- friend or foe
> identification -- challenge. In Pakistan, if
> there is no response to IFF, jets are instantly
> scrambled and the aircraft is shot down with no
> further questions asked. This was clearly an
> inside job. Bush was afraid and rushed to the
> shelter of a nuclear bunker. He clearly feared
> a nuclear situation. Who could that have been?
> Will that also be hushed up in the
> investigation, like the Warren report after the
> Kennedy assassination?
>
> --
>
> Q: At this point, someone might be asking what
> you've been smoking. What is Israel's interest
> in such a monstrous plot, which, of course, no
> one believes except Islamist extremists who
> concocted this piece of disinformation in the
> first place, presumably to detract from the
> real culprits?
>
> A: Jews never agreed to Bush 41 (George H.W.
> Bush, the 41st president) or 43 (his son George
> W. Bush, the 43rd president). They made sure
> Bush senior didn't get a second term. His
> land-for-peace pressure in Palestine didn't
> suit Israel. They were also against the young
> Bush because he was considered too close to oil
> interests and the Gulf countries. Bush senior
> and Jim Baker had raised $150 million for Bush
> junior, much of it from Mideast sources or
> their American go-betweens. Bush 41 and Baker,
> as private citizens, had also facilitated the
> new strategic relationship between Saudi Arabia
> and Iran. I have this from sources in both
> countries. So clearly the prospect of a Bush 43
> was a potential danger to Israel.
>
> Jews were stunned by the way Bush stole the
> election in Florida. They had put big money on
> Al Gore. Israel has given its imperialist
> guardian parent opportunities to turn disaster
> into a pretext for imposing an all-encompassing
> military, political and economic agenda to
> further the cause of global capitalism. While
> Colin Powell is cautious and others are
> reckless and want to make up for their failure
> to defeat Saddam Hussein in the Gulf War 10
> years ago, the global agenda is the same.
>
> Israel knows it has a short shelf-life before
> it is overwhelmed by demographics. It is a
> state that was born in terrorism that
> terrorized Palestinians into the exile of
> refugee camps, where they have now subsisted in
> squalid refugee camps, and is now very much
> afraid of Pakistan's nuclear capability.
>
> Israel has now handed the Bush family the
> opportunity it has been waiting for to
> consolidate America's imperial grip on the Gulf
> and acquire control of the Caspian basin by
> extending its military presence in Central Asia.
> Bush conveniently overlooks -- or is not told
> -- the fact that Islamic fundamentalists got
> their big boost in the modern age as CIA assets
> in the covert campaign I was also involved with
> to force the Soviets out of Afghanistan. Bush
> senior was vice president during that entire
> campaign. And no sooner did he become president
> on Jan. 20, 1989, than he summoned an
> inter-agency intelligence meeting and issued an
> order, among several others, to clip the wings
> of ISI (Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence)
> that had been coordinating the entire operation
> in Afghanistan. I know this firsthand as I was
> DGISI at the time (director general, ISI).
>
> --
>
> Q: So how do you read U.S. strategy in Pakistan?
>
> A: The destabilization of Pakistan is part of
> the U.S. plan because it is a Muslim nuclear
> state. The U.S. wants to isolate Pakistan from
> China as part of its containment policy.
> President Nixon's book "The Real War" said
> China would be the superpower of the 21st
> Century. The U.S. is also creating hostility
> between Pakistan and Afghanistan, two Muslim
> states to reverse the perception that the
> Islamic world now has its own nuclear weapons.
> Bush 43 doesn't realize he is being manipulated
> by people who understand geopolitics. He is not
> leading but being led. All he can do is think
> in terms of the wanted-dead-or-alive culture,
> which is how Hollywood conditions the masses to
> think and act.
>
> All summer long we heard about America's
> shrinking surplus and that the Pentagon would
> not have sufficient funds to modernize for the
> 21st century. And now, all of a sudden, the
> Pentagon can get what it wants without any
> Democratic Party opposition. How very
> convenient! Even your cherished civil liberties
> can now be abridged with impunity to protect
> the expansion of the hegemony of transnational
> capitalism. There is now a new excuse to crush
> anti-globalization protests.
>
> Bush 43 follows Bush 41. Iraq was baited into
> the Kuwaiti trap when the U.S. told Saddam it
> was not interested in his inter-Arab squabbles.
> Two days later, he moved into Kuwait, which was
> an Iraqi province anyway before the British
> Empire decreed otherwise. Roosevelt baited the
> Pearl Harbor trap for the Japanese empire,
> which provided the pretext for entering World
> War II. And now the Israelis have given the U.S.
> the pretext for further expansion into an area
> that will be critical in the next 25 years -
> the Caspian basin.
>
> --
>
> Q: Were you a fundamentalist in the days of the
> war against the Soviets in Afghanistan when you
> worked closely with the CIA?
>
> A: Not as much as I am today.
>
> --
>
> Q: What turned you against America?
>
> A: Betrayals and broken promises and what was
> done to my army career.
>
> --
>
> Q: And what was that?
>
> A: President Ishaq Khan, who succeeded Zia
> ul-Haq after his plane was blown out of the sky,
> wanted to appoint me chief of staff, the
> highest position in the Pakistani army. The U.S.,
> which by then had clipped ISI's wings, also
> blocked my promotion by informing the president
> I was unacceptable. So I was moved to a corps
> commander position. As ISI director, I held the
> whole Mujahideen movement in the palm of my
> hands. We were all pro-American. But then
> America left us in the lurch and everything
> went to pieces, including Afghanistan.
>
> The U.S. pushed for a broad-based Afghan
> government of seven factions and then waved
> goodbye. Even in the best of democracies, a
> broad-based coalition does not work. So we
> quickly had seven jokers in Kabul interested in
> only one thing - jockeying for power. The
> gunplay quickly followed, which led to the
> creation of Taliban, the students of the
> original Mujahideen, who decided to put an end
> to it.
>
> --
>
> Q: What happened to the 1,000 shoulder-fired
> Stinger anti-aircraft missiles that were
> supplied by president Reagan in 1986 and 87 to
> the Mujahideen, and that literally grounded the
> Soviet air force?
>
> A: After the Soviets pulled out, the CIA
> allocated $60 million to try to buy them back.
> This just drove the black market price up for
> one Stinger from $100,000 to $300,000. The
> Taliban still have about 250 of them for the
> kind of situation they face today against U.S.
> aircraft.
>
> --
>
> Q: Is the U.S. now your enemy?
>
> A: Is the U.S. national interest in
> contradiction with the Muslim world? The U.S.
> needs oil, as do its European allies. You have
> between 6 and 8 million American Muslims and
> their ranks are growing. About the same number
> in Europe. Israel aside, we are America's
> natural allies. Prof. Sam Huntington in his
> "Clash of Civilizations" puts Confucius and
> Judeo-Christians in one corner, and us n the
> other. His prescription is wrong but is being
> adopted by Bush 43 who has now put 60 countries
> on his hit list. This is the diabolical school
> that wants to launch an anti-Muslim "crusade."
> Muslims understood what Bush meant when he used
> that word.
>
> We need a meeting, not a clash, of
> civilizations. We are on the brink of disaster.
> It is time to pull back from the brink and
> reassess before we blow ourselves up. The
> purpose of Islam is service to humanity. The
> time for like-minded people to have a meeting
> of the minds is now.
>
> --
>
> Q: But you are against democracy, so how can
> there be a meeting of the minds?
>
> A: Democracy does not work. Politicians are
> constantly thinking of their next election, not
> the public good, which means, at best,
> constantly shading the truth to hide it from
> their constituents. Their pronouncements are
> laced with lies and the voters are lulled or
> gulled into believing utter nonsense. The Koran
> says call a spade a spade. It is the supreme
> law and tells right from wrong. There is no
> notion of "my country right or wrong" under
> divine law. The creator's will predominates.
> All if subservient to Allah's will and
> adherence to a set of basic, fundamental values.
>
> --
>
> Q: So what kind of a system are you advocating?
>
> A: The world needs a post-modern state system.
> Right now, the nation-state and round the clock
> satellite TV lead people to imitate America's
> way of life. Which is mathematically impossible.
> You have 4 percent of the world's population
> consuming 32 percent of the world's resources.
> The creator through Prophet Mohammed said equal
> distribution. Capitalism is the negation of the
> creator's will. It leads to imperialism and
> unilateralism.
>
> --
>
> Q: So what does this post-modern state system
> look like?
>
> A: A global village under divine order, or we
> will have global bloodshed until good triumphs
> over evil. Islam encapsulates all the principal
> religions and what was handed down 1,400 years
> ago was the normal evolutionary sequel to
> Judaism and Christianity. The prophet's last
> sermon was a universal document of human rights
> for everyone that surpasses everything that
> came since, including America's declaration of
> independence and the U.N. Charter of universal
> rights. If you superimpose true secular values
> on true Islamic values, there is no difference.
> So surely divine law should supersede man-made
> law. Islam is egalitarian, tolerant and
> progressive. It is the wave of the future.
>
> --
>
> Q: Marxism also believed that the nation-state
> would eventually wither away.
>
> A: Socialism jumped the rails when it was
> co-opted by the imperialist Soviet state. Islam
> believes in dynamism, Christianity stands for
> static statism. The pope in all his
> pronouncements has expressed a dogmatic
> attachment to the status quo. Why are so many
> black Americans converting to Islam? Because
> they are looking for true equality which they
> cannot find under capitalism. Allah has no
> gender, neither male nor female. Islam has no
> indirect taxation in an interest-free economy.
> Usury was a Jewish concept.
>
> --
>
> Q: Is Iran your model?
>
> A: There isn't a single true Islamic state in
> the world today. Iran has moved forward from
> its 1979 revolution, but I am not sure whether
> it's the right direction.
>
> --
>
> Q: And Taliban?
>
> A: They represent Islam in its purest form so
> far. It's a clean sheet. And they were also
> moving in the right direction when this crisis
> was cooked up by the U.S. Until Sept. 11, they
> had perfect law and order with no formal police
> force, only traffic cops without sidearms. Now,
> in less than two weeks, they have mobilized
> some 300,000 volunteers to fight American and
> British invaders if they come.
>
> --
>
> Q: And you reaction to U.S. demands on Pakistan?
>
> A: If Pakistan gives the U.S. base rights we
> will have a national upheaval. And if the U.S.
> attacks Afghanistan, there will be a call -- a
> fatwa -- for a general jihad. All borders will
> then disappear and it will be a no-holds-barred
> Islamic uprising against Israel and American
> imperialism. Pakistan will be engulfed in the
> firestorm. So I can only hope that cooler heads
> will prevail in Washington.
>
> --
>
> Q: What about the other U.S. demands?
>
> A: Overflight rights are meaningless since the
> U.S. violates air space daily all over the
> world. As for intelligence sharing with ISI,
> you can't even catch your own terrorists. And
> what ISI gives you will be of marginal value
> anyway.
>
> --
>
> Q: President (Pervez) Musharraf has made strong
> statements supporting the U.S.
>
> A: He was my student in the army. He is a good
> man, but he doesn't understand Islam. The army
> will never fight the masses. If push comes to
> shove, Musharraf will say no to the Americans
> rather than turn against the people. He is not
> just facing a handful of angry people. By his
> own admission, it's 10 percent to 15 percent of
> the population, or at least 10 million people
> willing to fight. For openers, they would close
> the port of Karachi. A country cannot breathe
> without lungs.
>
> --
>
> Q: Back to Osama's terrorist network. Who was
> behind the bombing of the U.S. Embassies in
> Tanzania and Kenya?
>
> A: Mossad is strong in both countries. Remember
> the Israeli operation to free hostages in
> Entebbe (Uganda)? Both Kenya and Tanzania were
> part of the logistical tail. A so-called
> associate of Osama was framed at Karachi
> airport. The incidents took place on Aug. 8,
> 1999, and on the 10th a short, clean-shaven man
> disembarks at Karachi airport and presents the
> passport of a bearded man. Not your passport,
> he was told. He then tries to bribe the clerk
> with 200 rupees. A ludicrously small sum given
> the circumstances. The clerk says no and turns
> him in and he starts singing right away. Not
> plausible. Osama has sworn to me on the Koran
> it was not him and he is truthful to a fault.
> Pious Muslims do not kill innocent civilians
> who included many Muslim victims. The passport
> must have been switched while the man was
> asleep on the plane in what has all the
> earmarks of a Mossad operation. For 10 years,
> the Mujahideen fought the Soviets in
> Afghanistan and not a single Soviet embassy was
> touched anywhere in the world. So this could
> not have been Osama's followers.
>
> --
>
> Q: What if bin Laden has been lying to you and
> is guilty. Is that inconceivable?
>
> A: If Taliban are given irrefutable evidence of
> his guilt, I am in favor of a fair trial. In
> America, one is entitled to a jury of peers.
> But he has no American peers. The Taliban would
> not object, in the event of a prima face case,
> to an international Islamic court meeting in
> The Hague. They would turn extradite Osama to
> the Netherlands.
>
>-- Copyright 2001 by United Press International.
>All rights reserved. --
|
| Files Listed: 35 |
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information,
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|
