NewsMine — war-on-terror — north-korea — Viewing Item

Tennessee arms north korea Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,410102,00.html http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,410102,00.html Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2003 Nukes: To Pyongyang from Nashville? Backers of a proposed uranium enrichment plant have a bad history with keeping secrets By ADAM ZAGORIN Is President Bush's "axis of evil" campaign about to be undermined in his own backyard? A proposed uranium enrichment facility planned in Hartsville, Tenn. (pop. 2,395) raises just that question. One of the plant's principal backers is URENCO, a European consortium linked to leaks of enrichment technology to, yes, Iran, Iraq, and North Korea — as well as to Pakistan. Sources tell TIME that senior Bush appointees, upset by the ongoing crisis with North Korea, have held detailed discussions in recent days on the need to stop leaks of nuclear technology to rogue states. "To have this company operate in the U.S. after it was the source of sensitive technology reaching foreign powers does raise serious concerns," a high-level U.S. nuclear security administrator told TIME, the first public comment by a federal official on the proposed plant's ownership. "The national security community or the new Homeland Security Department will need to look at this." Concerns about URENCO first emerged more than 10 years ago when thousands of centrifuge parts, based on URENCO designs, were discovered by U.N. inspectors in Iraq after the Gulf War. A one-time URENCO scientist, known as the "father" of Pakistan's nuclear bomb, is said to have taken URENCO centrifuge blueprints and information on the company's suppliers to his homeland, later passing similar sensitive material to North Korea and Iran. The company that wants to build the new Tennessee enrichment plant is called Louisiana Energy Services. A consortium of US and foreign companies in which URENCO has a major financial role, LES insists that the link between URENCO and nuclear proliferation is "long ago and far-fetched at this point". URENCO itself has denied authorizing leaks of technology to rogue states. The only previous attempt by LES to build an enrichment plant involved a multi-year effort in the 1990's targeting a small town in Louisiana. Closed Congressional hearings on Iraqi attempts to acquire nuclear weapons were held not long before, and delved into URENCO's record. Subsequently, powerful Michigan Democrat John Dingell raised concerns that the LES plant in Louisiana might violate provisions governing the movement of classified technology from foreign countries under the federal Atomic Energy Act. That issue was never resolved, but LES gave up attempts to build the Louisiana facility amid controversy over its impact on nearby African-American residents. With its latest effort in Tennessee, LES seems especially anxious to avoid a reprise of those controversies. In an unusual move, LES has asked for a greenlight from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission without the usual public comment on various environmental, safety and security issues. But groups like the Sierra Club and the National Resources Defense Council contend that this will simply, "reduce the . . . licensing procedure to a flimsy rubber stamp." LES plans to file its 3,000 page license application with the federal government by January 30, to be followed by a review process that could take at least a year. Also controversial are unanswered questions about the disposal of the Tennessee plant's radioactive waste. Officials in Tennessee have reached a tentative agreement with LES to cap the amount of waste and, last week , the company announced that the material would not stay in Tennessee permanently. But it offered no details as to where the waste might be transferred, a process that can be subject to complex federal licensing procedures. So far few Tennessee politicians have taken a position on the new enrichment plant. That includes Sen. Bill Frist, the new Senate Majority Leader, who has remained neutral on the proposed plant in his home state. But he plans to follow the debate "very closely," says an aide. Copyright © 2003 Time Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

2008-peace nuclear 100 missiles aimed us cities { May 4 2003 } 1m nkoreans protest { June 26 2003 } Aid from china Big blast mushroom cloud reported in Nkorea Carter blames bush for north korea nuclear test China center stage north korea talks { August 28 2003 } Considers canceling talks already Defector tells congress heroin production Heroin trail leads north korea { May 12 2003 } Israel helps china { December 9 2002 } Japan alarmed by nkorea missile test { June 20 2006 } Japan downplays nkorea provocation { February 26 2003 } Japan nkorea Japan raises defenses on north korea missile test plans { September 24 2004 } Japan threatens nkorea { February 13 2003 } Korean clash Korean jets lock us aircraft { March 4 2003 } Korean migs intercepted reconnaissance Korean official drug ship { May 3 2003 } Missiles can hit us { February 12 2003 } Muclear pact dead document { May 13 2003 } Nkorea cautions security council { April 9 2003 } Nkorea chief vows punishment Nkorea fired laser at troops { May 13 2003 } Nkorea fires anti ship missile { March 31 2003 } Nkorea global threat Nkorea issues war warning { April 24 2003 } Nkorea missile could reach us Nkorea seeks talks with US over missile Nkorea ship yemen { December 11 2002 } Nkorea warns preemptive action { February 6 2003 } Nkorea warns sea of fire Nkorea warns us retaliation sanctions Nkorea will face world action if weapons exports continue North korea opium { April 23 2003 } North korea prepares for US war { April 7 2004 } North korea test nuclear missile { October 12 2006 } North korea tests long range missile { July 5 2006 } North korea to test missile capable of hitting US Pentagon plans nkorea bombing raid { April 22 2003 } Perle asks north korea strike { June 11 2003 } Raises ww3 fears { January 10 2003 } Russia predicts northkorea catasrophy { April 24 2003 } Sanctions means war Shift troops skorea { March 7 2003 } Skorea fires shots South koreans support north against US Taliban revival north korea { April 9 2003 } Tennessee arms north korea US allows north koreans to sell arms { April 8 2007 } US and north korea hold nuclear talks { March 5 2007 } Us cant rule out strike { June 11 2003 } Us considered nkorea war Us considers skorea withdraw { March 6 2003 } US reaches nuclear deal with north korea { January 2007 } Us urges nkorea sanctions { April 9 2003 } Washington grim warning { February 4 2003 } We can hit anywhere Yemen demands ship return Files Listed: 59

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.