News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinewar-on-terrornorth-korea — Viewing Item


Shift troops skorea { March 7 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.washtimes.com/national/20030307-68272134.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20030307-68272134.htm

U.S. plans to shift troops in South Korea
Rowan Scarborough
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Published March 7, 2003


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said yesterday that he plans to move some American troops away from the demilitarized zone separating North and South Korea.
"I suspect that what we'll do is we'll end up making some adjustments there," Mr. Rumsfeld said.
He described at least three options: Move troops farther south on the Korean Peninsula, place them elsewhere in Asia or send them home.
Mr. Rumsfeld's most explicit statement to date that the United States will reposition some of its 37,000 troops in South Korea could ease heightened tensions between Washington and the North. He made his remarks during a "town hall" meeting with Pentagon employees.
Pyongyang has thrust the Korean Peninsula into a crisis by restarting a nuclear weapons program, threatening aggression against the South and intercepting an American military spy plane in international air space on Sunday.
Although Mr. Rumsfeld talked of fewer troops near North Korea, the Bush administration also sent a strong signal to the Stalinist regime that the United States was prepared to blunt any invasion of the South.
The first of 24 U.S. heavy bombers have arrived in Guam. Twelve B-1Bs and as many B-52s are scheduled to deploy to the Pacific island. The Pentagon is not just showing its displeasure with the fighter planes from the North locking an RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft into their radar. It also wants to signal that a war with Iraq does not mean the United States cannot respond to any military move on the peninsula.
Mr. Rumsfeld said a redeployment is possible because South Korea's armed-forces commitment of 683,000 troops is now capable of providing "the kind of upfront deterrent that is needed."
In addition, U.S. air and sea assets can move in reinforcements, he said.
"We still have a lot of forces in Korea arranged very far forward, where it's intrusive in their lives, and where they really aren't very flexible or usable for other things," the defense secretary said.
He said the new president of South Korea, Roh Moo-hyun, has asked Washington to "look at how we might rebalance our relationship and our force structure."
The review is being spearheaded by Army Gen. Leon LaPorte, commander of U.S. Forces Korea.
The Pentagon also is looking at moving a portion of 70,000 troops in Germany to smaller bases in Eastern Europe, whose governments support President Bush's plan to forcibly disarm Iraq and topple Saddam Hussein.
China and Russia both oppose an invasion of Iraq. They let it be known yesterday they also do not agree with Mr. Bush's approach to Pyongyang.
"Russia has noted with concern the statements that have been issued recently by official American representatives that the United States doesn't exclude military means of solving the so-called North Korean nuclear problem," the Russian Foreign Ministry said yesterday.
While the South Korean president wants a troop reduction, the country's prime minister, Goh Kun, said the United States must remain to deter the communist North.
"We should never weaken the deterrence capabilities of the U.S. military," the Associated Press quoted Mr. Goh as saying. "The trip wire should remain." The prime minister's post is largely ceremonial.
North Korea maintains a huge armed forces and has nearly 1 million troops poised on or near the DMZ and armed with hundreds of artillery pieces, tanks and armored personnel carriers.
Military analysts say an invasion would be likely to result in the capturing of Seoul before U.S. and South Korean forces would be in a position to repel the invasion and attack the North.
Mr. Rumsfeld yesterday again asserted that America has the troop strength to carry out the national military requirement to fight and conquer one aggressor, while nearly simultaneously defeating a second invasion.
Most analysts say the strategy has Iraq and North Korea in mind. For the first time since the two-war strategy went into effect after the fall of the Soviet Union, U.S. military planners are faced with the possibility of war with both countries.
Seoul and Washington plan formal talks next month on troop reshaping. The two agreed last year to reduce U.S. installations from 41 to 25 over 10 years.

Copyright © 2003 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Return to the article


2008-peace
nuclear
100 missiles aimed us cities { May 4 2003 }
1m nkoreans protest { June 26 2003 }
Aid from china
Big blast mushroom cloud reported in Nkorea
Carter blames bush for north korea nuclear test
China center stage north korea talks { August 28 2003 }
Considers canceling talks already
Defector tells congress heroin production
Heroin trail leads north korea { May 12 2003 }
Israel helps china { December 9 2002 }
Japan alarmed by nkorea missile test { June 20 2006 }
Japan downplays nkorea provocation { February 26 2003 }
Japan nkorea
Japan raises defenses on north korea missile test plans { September 24 2004 }
Japan threatens nkorea { February 13 2003 }
Korean clash
Korean jets lock us aircraft { March 4 2003 }
Korean migs intercepted reconnaissance
Korean official drug ship { May 3 2003 }
Missiles can hit us { February 12 2003 }
Muclear pact dead document { May 13 2003 }
Nkorea cautions security council { April 9 2003 }
Nkorea chief vows punishment
Nkorea fired laser at troops { May 13 2003 }
Nkorea fires anti ship missile { March 31 2003 }
Nkorea global threat
Nkorea issues war warning { April 24 2003 }
Nkorea missile could reach us
Nkorea seeks talks with US over missile
Nkorea ship yemen { December 11 2002 }
Nkorea warns preemptive action { February 6 2003 }
Nkorea warns sea of fire
Nkorea warns us retaliation sanctions
Nkorea will face world action if weapons exports continue
North korea opium { April 23 2003 }
North korea prepares for US war { April 7 2004 }
North korea test nuclear missile { October 12 2006 }
North korea tests long range missile { July 5 2006 }
North korea to test missile capable of hitting US
Pentagon plans nkorea bombing raid { April 22 2003 }
Perle asks north korea strike { June 11 2003 }
Raises ww3 fears { January 10 2003 }
Russia predicts northkorea catasrophy { April 24 2003 }
Sanctions means war
Shift troops skorea { March 7 2003 }
Skorea fires shots
South koreans support north against US
Taliban revival north korea { April 9 2003 }
Tennessee arms north korea
US allows north koreans to sell arms { April 8 2007 }
US and north korea hold nuclear talks { March 5 2007 }
Us cant rule out strike { June 11 2003 }
Us considered nkorea war
Us considers skorea withdraw { March 6 2003 }
US reaches nuclear deal with north korea { January 2007 }
Us urges nkorea sanctions { April 9 2003 }
Washington grim warning { February 4 2003 }
We can hit anywhere
Yemen demands ship return

Files Listed: 59



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple