News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinewar-on-terrorafghanistancolateral-damage — Viewing Item


No investigation { August 21 2002 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42396-2002Aug20.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42396-2002Aug20.html

Seeking The Truth In Afghan Graves


By Leonard S. Rubenstein

Wednesday, August 21, 2002; Page A17


Throughout its campaign to immunize U.S. military peacekeepers from the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, the Bush administration has defended its commitment to identify and prosecute perpetrators of mass murder and other war criminals.

As evidence, administration officials cite their support for the ad hoc tribunals for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, their placement of a career lawyer from the Defense Department as lead prosecutor for the new Sierra Leone tribunal and their diplomatic efforts to establish an effective tribunal in Cambodia. And yet in Afghanistan, where the United States has had the greatest power to ensure investigation of possible mass atrocities and ensure that the guilty are brought to justice, until now they did nothing.

For months, evidence has accumulated that many of the Taliban fighters who surrendered after the fall of Mazar-e Sharif and Kunduz last November were killed by Northern Alliance forces under the control of Gen. Abdurrashid Dostum. Eyewitnesses report that the prisoners died of asphyxiation after being transported in sealed containers to the Shebergan prison. The number of dead is not known, but the current issue of Newsweek, citing the accounts of survivors and drivers of the container trucks, estimates hundreds or even thousands of deaths.

The clues to finding the truth lie in mass graves near the prison. A comprehensive forensic investigation could reveal the number of dead, who they are and how they died -- and lead to a determination of who was responsible. In January, two investigators from Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) discovered a mass grave site, and in February PHR's forensic scientists found fresh remains. In early March, we shared the information about our discoveries with the State and Defense departments, as well as with the United Nations and the Afghan government. We urgently sought American military protection of the sites from the high risk of tampering, and we asked for an immediate and thorough investigation of the graves.

Only the United States is in a position to ensure the security essential to allowing an investigation to go forward. On moral grounds, too, an especially compelling reason exists for U.S. action: The perpetrator of the alleged war crime is its own military ally.

The administration's response, though, has been inadequate. The Pentagon has refused to provide security for an investigation, much less conduct one. It has even refused to acknowledge that anything untoward may have taken place in the prisoner surrenders last fall.

The United States has often warned those who commit war crimes that somewhere, somehow, they will be discovered and pursued -- and for good reason. The lesson of postwar Bosnia, Rwanda and East Timor has been that stability cannot occur without accountability for missing persons and human rights violations. Here the evidence of war crimes is sitting in those graves, waiting to reveal its truth.

Action is essential before the evidence is destroyed. The Bush administration this week promised to move forward. To be most effective, it should initiate a Security Council resolution to form a U.N. commission of inquiry that will conduct a credible and independent investigation of the prisoners' fate. Otherwise, the United States risks the very political manipulation of war crimes investigations that it claims (erroneously, I believe) is a flaw in the International Criminal Court. Multinational forces should provide the security and the administration should provide the resources needed to enable such an investigation to succeed. U.S. allies may be innocent. But they may be guilty of mass murder. It is time to find out.

The writer is executive director of Physicians for Human Rights.



© 2002 The Washington Post Company


28 troops implicated manslaughter in afghanistan
8 afghans killed 12 10 03 [jpg]
Afganistan airstrike kills 76 { April 2006 }
Afghan hospital strike kills 15 { October 31 2001 }
Afghan soliders killed accidently { May 21 2003 }
Aghanistan bomb kills 11 civilians { April 10 2003 }
Airstrike coverup { July 29 2002 }
Airstrike in afghanistan killed civilians and infant { August 11 2005 }
Airstrike kills 17 afghan civilians { July 5 2005 }
Bloody blunder { January 7 2002 }
Bombed wedding { May 18 2002 }
Bombed wedding2 { July 2 2002 }
Bombed wedding3 { July 2 2002 }
Bombing that went wrong { July 2 2002 }
Carpetbomb { November 19 2001 }
Cluster111 [jpg]
Disappeared { August 8 2002 }
Evidence massacre { August 19 2002 }
Flawed air strikes { July 21 2002 }
Food drops similar to cluster bombs
Fooddrop roof
Hiding dead { August 8 2002 }
Inquiry airstrikes { July 9 2002 }
Nine afghan kids dead after air strike
No investigation { August 21 2002 }
Pentagon defends { July 16 2002 }
Proves civilians hit { October 14 2001 }
Reasons why bombs hit civilians
Scores killed afghan wedding
Troops mistakenly kill 4 afghans { May 21 2003 }
Un accused coverup { July 29 2002 }
Unexploded bombs litter village
US airstrike kills seven afghan children { June 18 2007 }
Us bombing kills 11 afghan civilians
Us bombs killed 1500
Warplane kills 11 aghan civilians { July 1 2002 }
Wedding party { July 1 2002 }
Woman children { May 25 2002 }

Files Listed: 38



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple