NewsMine — deceptions — terrorism — okc-1995 — Viewing Item

Did mcveigh have more help in bombing Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://www.sltrib.com/2004/Feb/02282004/nation_w/143272.asp http://www.sltrib.com/2004/Feb/02282004/nation_w/143272.asp Did McVeigh have more help in bombing? FBI reopens case The Associated Press WASHINGTON -- The FBI ordered a review of some aspects of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing investigation Friday, reopening the question of whether Timothy McVeigh may have had more accomplices, government officials said. Reacting to an AP story earlier this week, the FBI ordered agents to determine why some documents did not properly reach the bureau's Oklahoma City task force during the original investigation or get turned over to McVeigh's lawyers before he was executed in 2001. The review will also try to determine whether FBI agents in a separate investigation of white supremacist bank robbers may have failed to alert the Oklahoma City investigation of a possible link between the robbers and McVeigh, and allowed some of that evidence to be destroyed. AP reported Wednesday that documents never introduced at McVeigh's trial showed FBI agents destroyed evidence and failed to share other information that raised the possibility that a gang of white supremacist bank robbers may have assisted McVeigh.

j-d-cash 1996 Gingrich terror law after Oklahoma bombing Aryan gang connected with bombing Bomb went off before truck bomb { April 17 2005 } Clear evidence that others were involved { December 30 1998 } Congress says fbi covered for okc bombing suspects { December 25 2006 } Did mcveigh have more help in bombing Fbi agents call probe destruction evidence Fbi destroyed gang link evidence Fbi destroys evidence Fbi killed man resembling okc john doe 2 { July 8 2007 } Fbi orders internal review of oklahoma city bombing { February 28 2004 } Fbi refused 22 eyewitness testimonies Fbi to review oklahoma city bomb probe { February 28 2004 } Fbi told to hunt for records on bombing { May 10 2005 } Feds canceled raid which would have prevented blast { April 19 1995 } Final report on okc bombing reveals government lies Grand jury ignores evidence of conspiracy { December 30 1998 } High level doj cant stomach coverup { July 14 2005 } High ranking fbi involved in oklahoma bombing Judge orders docs on fbi informant and oklahoma bombing { May 9 2005 } Judge refuses to hear government conspiracy evidence { April 22 2004 } Many still look for the truth on okc { April 19 2005 } Many witnesses saw mcveigh with john doe number 2 { May 2 2004 } Mcveigh aligned with german military man { April 19 1995 } Mob inmate tip ignored by FBI Mobsters tip revealed explosives { April 19 1995 } More accomplices in 1995 oklahoma city bombing { February 29 2004 } Nichols accuses bomb making accomplice roger moore { May 4 2005 } Nichols defense rely on conspiracy theories twists { February 28 2004 } Nichols readies oklahoma bombing defense { April 19 1995 } Nichols says roger moore is fbi informant { May 4 2005 } Okc bombing hints { April 19 1995 } OKC bombing [jpg] Okc conspiracy Okc warning { April 19 1995 } Oklahoma bombing survivor describes injuries { April 30 2004 } Ramzi yousef brought to justice with tips program { December 14 2000 } Representative charles key challenges official story { April 19 1995 } Representative gathered 13000 signatures for investigation { April 19 1995 } Scientust details oklahoma city bomb residue { April 30 2004 } Secret service coversup okc security tape Secret service document makes reference to video tape { April 19 2004 } Security tape shows oklahoma city bombing Tape shows oklahoma bomber had help { April 19 1995 } Terry nichols sentenced to life for okc bombing Victims family members suspect larger conspiracy Witness to oklahoma city bombing to be freed Witnesses heard multiple explosions Files Listed: 48

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.