NewsMine — cabal-elite — w-administration — big-money — energy-bill — Viewing Item

Gasoline additive MTBE energy bill scuttle Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Politics/ap20031119_2082.html http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Politics/ap20031119_2082.html Daschle Says He Will Vote for Energy Bill Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle Says He Will Vote for Energy Bill The Associated Press WASHINGTON Nov. 19 — Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle is ready to support the broad energy bill and will oppose attempts to scuttle it by a filibuster, one of the senator's aides said Wednesday. The decision casts doubt on whether opponents can succeed in blocking the bill through a filibuster over a dispute involving the gasoline additive MTBE, which has been found to contaminate drinking water supplies. A spokesman for Daschle, Dan Pfeiffer, said the South Dakota senator will vote for ending debate on the bill, overcoming a filibuster, as long as senators are given time to adequately debate the legislation. "There is a lot of legitimate concern about the bill on both sides of the aisle ... (but) he will support it because of ethanol and other provisions in the bill on energy efficiency," Pfeiffer said. On Wednesday night, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., and other Republicans set a parliamentary vote for Friday for ending the debate. That would force a final up-or-down decision on the 1,100-page bill. Republicans hope to finish the bill and send it to President Bush before the end of the week. The House passed the energy legislation by a wide margin on Tuesday. Earlier in the day, Daschle made known his support of the bill in an interview with a Yankton, S.D., radio station, WNAX, in which he said that while the legislation wasn't perfect, it was good news for ethanol and other renewable fuels. South Dakota is a major producer of corn-based ethanol. The bill calls for doubling ethanol production to 5 billion gallons a year by 2012. As Senate debate began Wednesday on the GOP-written bill, some Republican lawmakers prepared to break ranks in a showdown over a provision that would shield makers of MTBE for product liability lawsuits charging that it is polluting water supplies. A number of Democrats, joined by a handful of Republicans, have been considering a filibuster over the issue, but it's uncertain how much support they have. The stalling procedure can be turned back by 60 votes. "It's neck-and-neck, it's a horse race," Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said of the informal vote count. "We'll certainly lose some Democrats and we'll certainly pick up some Republicans." Daschle's support has been seen as crucial to the bill's passage. Daschle said in the radio interview that he was disappointed with the MTBE waiver but that he would support an end to debate as long as senators were given adequate time to debate the issue and the bill. Senate approval is the last hurdle to getting the bill to President Bush, who is eager to sign it. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who opposes the bill because of the MTBE waiver and other issues said, "I've been for ethanol for 21 years, and I just can't do this. That's a bargain with the devil." Some Republicans, especially those from New Hampshire, Maine and Arizona have protested the industry subsidies in the bill as well as the MTBE liability provision. "If a person cannot live in their home, is that not a health hazard?" Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., angrily asked Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., on the Senate floor. The bill would undermine New Hampshire's lawsuit against 22 oil companies over MTBE water contamination. They complained the bill subsidizes Midwest coal-fired power plants whose air pollution drifts over the Northeast and will not fix problems that led to the Aug. 14 blackout. "It is biased against the Northeast," said Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine. "This bill does not offer the balanced energy policy that America needs." But Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., called it "truly the best bill this Congress can produce. ... We all have something to gain from this compromise." The bill resulted from 2 1/2 months of sometimes bitter negotiations between House and Senate Republicans and almost no input from Democrats. It would provide $23 billion in tax incentives and includes measures to produce more coal, oil, natural gas and nuclear power.

14 billion tax breaks in 2005 energy bill { July 27 2005 } Appeals court dismisses cheney suit on energy bill { May 10 2005 } Bush admits drug card concerns { June 15 2004 } Document says oil chiefs met with cheney { November 16 2005 } Energy bill gives 23b in tax breaks Energy bill gives industry billions Gasoline additive MTBE energy bill scuttle Hooters and polluters { December 17 2003 } House energy bill full of tax breaks for energy corporations { April 22 2005 } Industry tax breaks fill gop energy bill { November 15 2003 } Ruling says white house medicare videos were illegal { May 20 2004 } Tax breaks ethanol mandates stalls in senate { November 20 2003 } Files Listed: 12

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.