| Greenspan warns not to pay down debt { March 22 2001 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active) http://www.senate.gov/~budget/republican/about/hearing2001/PVD322.htmhttp://www.senate.gov/~budget/republican/about/hearing2001/PVD322.htm
OPENING STATEMENT of SENATOR PETE V. DOMENICI
Hearing on Debt Management
March 22, 2001
Good morning. I want to thank everyone for coming here today and I’m looking forward to a lively exchange of views. We have a very distinguished panel.
Until recently, Gary Gensler was Treasury Undersecretary for Domestic Finance. Ward McCarthy is the co-founder of Stone & McCarthy Research Associates, a major provider of financial-market and economic information. Ted Truman is a senior fellow at the Institute for International Economics and was, until recently, Assistant Treasury Secretary for International Affairs. Albert Wojnilower is a senior economic advisor to Craig-Drill Capital and for over 25 years was chief economist for Credit Suisse First Boston.
Paying down the debt may seem like a new issue to us, but it is not a new issue for the country. Back in 1887, President Grover Cleveland – a Democrat – said that large budget surpluses were turning the Treasury into a "hoarding place for money,...preventing investment in productive enterprise, threatening financial disturbance, and inviting schemes of public plunder."
Like President Cleveland, President Bush sees large budget surpluses as a reason to cut taxes. The President’s budget will also use the surpluses to pay down $2 trillion in debt over the next 10 years.
Debt reduction is a wonderful thing, but retiring too much debt too fast would require the payment of "penalty premiums." Chairman Greenspan recently noted that getting many bondholders, particularly foreign bondholders, to discard their Treasuries prior to maturity would be – in his words – "extraordinarily expensive and obviously undesirable."
In fact, a large portion of the penalty premiums would go to foreign bondholders, who own 42% of the privately-held debt – and this percentage is growing. As bad as it would be to use the surpluses to pay down debt too quickly, another scenario is even worse: letting the government use the surpluses to accumulate private assets. Make no mistake: I strongly oppose government accumulation of private assets.
This is one of the reasons I support President Bush’s tax plan. If taxes are not cut, the money will either be spent or used to accumulate assets. Taxes need to be cut and the sooner the better. Having said that, I’d like to turn to the Ranking Member who will also make a statement and then we’ll proceed to our witnesses.
|
|