NewsMine — cabal-elite — election-fraud — 2004 — Viewing Item

Bush 15 perc above new hampshire exit polls { November 16 2004 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/11/16/national1226EST0548.DTL http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/11/16/national1226EST0548.DTL Nader activists ask for New Hampshire recount, question accuracy of optical vote-scan machines - KATHARINE WEBSTER, Associated Press Writer Tuesday, November 16, 2004 (11-16) 10:02 PST CONCORD, N.H. (AP) -- New Hampshire is about to become a test case for the accuracy of optical scan vote-counting machines because third-party presidential candidate Ralph Nader has asked for a recount. The request covers 11 of the state's 126 precincts that use Diebold Inc.'s Accuvote optical scanning machines to count paper ballots. Depending on the results, his campaign could ask for recounts in other states, spokesman Kevin Zeese said Monday. Nader doesn't expect to change the outcome: In New Hampshire, Democrat John Kerry defeated President Bush, 50 percent to 49 percent, while Nader got less than 1 percent from the state's 301 precincts. However, the former consumer advocate wants to address concerns that the machines are inaccurate or can be tampered with, Zeese said. Backers urged Nader to request a recount after a statistical analysis posted on the Internet appeared to show that some New Hampshire precincts using the Accuvote machines gave President Bush up to 15 percent more votes than had been expected on the basis of exit polls and the 2000 presidential vote. Claims of vote fraud are "spreading like wildfire around the Internet, and if it keeps going people are going to be suspicious always, so why not check it out?" Zeese said. The Secretary of State's office said the recount will begin Thursday. Ida Briggs, a Michigan software developer and database manager who did the statistical analysis, said she found that precincts using the Accuvote machines deviated from the expected voting trend more often and by larger margins than those using a different optical scanning system or hand-counting. State election officials are skeptical, saying that in past recounts they have not found significant miscounts by Accuvote machines. Although Diebold, of North Canton, Ohio, has faced criticism over problems with its touch-screen voting machines, it said its optical scanners have proved reliable over years of use. "I think they're rushing to judgment," spokesman David Bear said of the recount advocates. On the Net: Statistical analysis of New Hampshire vote: www.invisibleida.com Diebold scanner: www.diebold.com/dieboldes/accuvote_os.htm

2004 florida vote purge questions 260 thousand florida votes unexplained Arizona muslims questioned before debate Broward county 60 thousand missing absentee ballots { October 27 2004 } Bush 15 perc above new hampshire exit polls { November 16 2004 } Bush gains votes in heavily democratic jewish florida counties { November 10 2004 } Bush gets 130 thousand unexplained florida votes { November 19 2004 } Bush wins popular vote as ohio hangs in balance Court stops gop redistricting { December 2 2003 } Democrats file 9 suits in florida Demoratic florida jewish counties went for bush { November 10 2004 } Dirty tricks to intimidate voters { November 1 2004 } Election rules be disenfranchise voters { October 10 2004 } Electronic voting raises new issues { October 25 2004 } Exit polls give kerry comfortable lead Exit polls show kerry leading ohio florida pennsylvania { November 3 2004 } Exit polls show voters dissatisfied with bush { November 2 2004 } FBI deters muslims from voting against bush FBI intimidates muslims from voting arizona Fbi shuts down ohio voting offices on election { November 5 2004 } Florida blacks blocked from voter registration { October 13 2004 } Florida plagued with early voting problems Forms destroyed in portland oregon { October 13 2004 } Gao to probe vote counting Global monitors find faults { November 3 2004 } GOP dirty tricks in ohio GOP firm faces voter fraud charge Gop pays legal bill for vote fraud defense { August 11 2005 } Group cites 7 southern states for irregularities { November 6 2004 } Highest ohio voting official chairman bush campaign { December 14 2004 } House democrats seek election inquiry Investigation into trashed voter registrations Judge upholds washington 2004 gubnatorial election Lawmaker seeks inquiry into ohio vote { December 15 2004 } Lost voters in ohio { December 15 2004 } Michigan ballots mix kerry and bush { October 8 2004 } Muslims harrassed before election { October 12 2004 } Naacp representative paid voter registrations with crack { October 18 2004 } Nevada registration fraud aimed at democrats New florida vote scandal feared { October 26 2004 } November 2 is vday for blacks in florida { October 11 2004 } Ohio cuts bush margin of victory { December 4 2004 } Ohio florida hang in the balance { November 2 2004 } Ohio sec state fights subpoena { December 28 2004 } Ohio to go through statewide recount after all Questions persist over forms Republicans demanded 2 forms of ID from blacks { November 3 2004 } Silent scream of numbers 2004 stolen election Six resign over absentee ballots { October 11 2004 } Some fear ohio will be florida of 2004 { October 26 2004 } South dakota questionable absentee ballots Thousands of florida ballots missing Thousands of florida voters may be refused Unusual votes in ohio black neighborhoods Vote errors in ohio democratic precincts Voter registration fraud in denver Voters complain about misleading calls Washington post tries to deflate election conspiracy { November 11 2004 } Zogby predicts kerry victory Files Listed: 59

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.