NewsMine — cabal-elite — election-fraud — 2000 — Viewing Item

Gore wins on statewide recount Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://216.239.41.104/search?q=cache:iO0UyFUGvewJ:www.drudgereport.com/mattv.htm+%22statewide+recount%22+florida+gore+votes&hl=en http://216.239.41.104/search?q=cache:iO0UyFUGvewJ:www.drudgereport.com/mattv.htm+%22statewide+recount%22+florida+gore+votes&hl=en XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN NOV 11, 2001 18:09:35 ET XXXXX BIG MEDIA FLORIDA RECOUNT: GORE TOPPED BUSH IF ALL UNDER/OVER VOTES COUNTED; LEGAL STRATEGY DESTROYED CHANCES **World Exclusive** **Must Credit DRUDGE REPORT** A vote-by-vote review of untallied ballots in the 2000 Florida presidential election commissioned by the nation's main media outlets shows Al Gore edged ahead of George W. Bush "under all the scenarios for counting all undervotes and overvotes statewide," the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. APCNNNYTWASHPOSTLATIMESNEWSDAYCHICAGOTRIB will splash in Monday editions an election review which will ignite total controversy during a time of war, publishing sources told DRUDGE on Sunday. MORE Bush would have narrowly prevailed in the partial recounts sought by Gore, but Gore could have "reversed the outcome -- by the smallest of margins -- had he pursued and gained a complete statewide recount," according to one interpretation of the database compiled by the monstermedia consortium. [Each media outlet will produce a news analysis based on the database product.] Under any standard that counted all disputed votes in Florida, Gore erased Bush's advantage and emerged with a tiny lead that ranged from 42 to 171 votes. Gore followed a legal strategy that would have led to his defeat even if it had not been rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court, according to one interpretation set for publication. Gore sought a recount of a small number of disputed ballots while the review indicates his only chance lay in a course he advocated publicly but did not pursue in court -- a full statewide recount of untallied votes! Gore took a 171-vote lead when the consortium tried to recreate how each county said it would handle a court-ordered statewide recount, and a 42-vote lead under what was called the "Palm Beach standard". MORE All outcomes were closer than the 537 votes of Bush's official victory, the media outlets will claim, while noting it would be impossible to interpret the survey results as definitive, with such narrow margins in all directions. Impacting... ----------------------------------------------------------- Filed By Matt Drudge Reports are moved when circumstances warrant http://www.drudgereport.com for updates (c)DRUDGE REPORT 2001 Not for reproduction without permission of the author

choicepoint Dnc-protests-2000 2000election fraud { January 24 2002 } 2000election suit ap Arafat calls for democratic elections in america { June 26 2002 } Blacks deterred from voting 2000 elections { May 24 2004 } Boise tells florida supreme court theres time for hand counts { December 7 2000 } Bush blocks 2000 manual count { November 11 2000 } Bush stole election { July 23 2001 } Bush wins { December 19 2000 } Chads shmads Count machines { November 14 2000 } Darn dimples { November 22 2000 } Dimpled chads dispute backfires on gore { November 23 2000 } Disappeared voters { February 5 2001 } Election battle returns to florida supreme court { December 5 2000 } Election story { March 12 2001 } Florida lists purged blacks protected hispanics Florida statewide recount favors gore as winner Gore assails court on 2000 election { November 15 2002 } Gore wins on statewide recount Gore would have gotten less than half nader votes { March 10 2004 } Hillary says bush not elected Judge compares bush taking office to benito Mussolini Putin criticizes US democracy { May 6 2005 } Recounts only in selected states Thousands of votes across country uncounted Files Listed: 25

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.