NewsMine — war-on-terror — iraq — pretext — wmd — weapons-declaration — Viewing Item

Alleged arms omissions Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://msnbc.com/news/849815.asp http://msnbc.com/news/849815.asp U.S. fact sheet on alleged Iraqi omissions -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Department releases examples of items lacking in report This “fact sheet” was released Thursday by the U.S. State Department. It was described as “Illustrative Examples of Omissions from the Iraqi Declaration to the United Nations Security Council.” ANTHRAX AND OTHER UNDECLARED BIOLOGICAL AGENTS The U.N. Special Commission concluded that Iraq did not verifiably account for, at a minimum, 2160 kg of growth media. This is enough to produce 26,000 liters of anthrax — 3 times the amount Iraq declared; 1,200 liters of botulinum toxin; and, 5,500 liters of clostridium perfrigens — 16 times the amount Iraq declared. Why does the Iraqi declaration ignore these dangerous agents in its tally? BALLISTIC MISSILES Iraq has disclosed manufacturing new energetic fuels suited only to a class of missile to which it does not admit. Iraq claims that flight-testing of a larger diameter missile falls within the 150 km limit. This claim is not credible. Why is the Iraqi regime manufacturing fuels for missiles it says it does not have? NUCLEAR WEAPONS The declaration ignores efforts to procure uranium from Niger. Why is the Iraqi regime hiding their uranium procurement? VX GAS PRODUCTION In 1999, U.N. Special Commission and international experts concluded that Iraq needed to provide additional, credible information about VX production. The declaration provides no information to address these concerns. What is the Iraqi regime trying to hide by not providing this information? CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS MUNITIONS In January 1999, the U.N. Special Commission reported that Iraq failed to provide credible evidence that 550 mustard gas-filled artillery shells and 400 biological weapon-capable aerial bombs had been lost or destroyed. The Iraqi regime has never adequately accounted for hundreds, possibly thousands, of tons of chemical precursors. Again, what is the Iraqi regime trying to hide by not providing this information? EMPTY CHEMICAL MUNITIONS There is no adequate accounting for nearly 30,000 empty munitions that could be filled with chemical agents. Where are these munitions? UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV) PROGRAMS Iraq denies any connection between UAV programs and chemical or biological agent dispersal. Yet, Iraq admitted in 1995 that a MIG-21 remote-piloted vehicle tested in 1991 was to carry a biological weapon spray system. Iraq already knows how to put these biological agents into bombs and how to disperse biological agent using aircraft or unmanned aerial vehicles. Why do they deny what they have already admitted? Why has the Iraqi regime acquired the range and auto-flight capabilities to spray biological weapons? MOBILE BIOLOGICAL WEAPON AGENT FACILITIES The Iraqi declaration provides no information about its mobile biological weapon agent facilities. Instead it insists that these are “refrigeration vehicles and food testing laboratories.” What is the Iraqi regime trying to hide about their mobile biological weapon facilities? SUMMARY None of these holes and gaps in Iraq’s declaration are mere accidents, editing oversights or technical mistakes: they are material omissions. Latest news on Iraq Document provided by the U.S. State Department.

Alleged arms omissions Blix sites inconsistencies Not disarming { January 22 2003 } Powell declares breach { December 19 2002 } Seeks excuse for war in 12000 pages of denial { December 8 2002 } Files Listed: 5

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.