NewsMine — war-on-terror — iraq — pre-invasion — inspections — Viewing Item

Us britian accuses blix { March 10 2003 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-605557,00.html http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-605557,00.html World News March 10, 2003 Blix 'hid smoking gun' from Britain and US From James Bone in New York BRITAIN and the United States will today press the chief UN weapons inspector to admit that he has found a “smoking gun” in Iraq. Such an admission could persuade swing voters on the Security Council to back the March 17 ultimatum. The British and US ambassadors plan to demand that Hans Blix reveals more details of a huge undeclared Iraqi unmanned aircraft, the discovery of which he failed to mention in his oral report to Security Council foreign ministers on Friday. Its existence was only disclosed in a declassified 173-page document circulated by the inspectors at the end of the meeting — an apparent attempt by Dr Blix to hide the revelation to avoid triggering a war. The discovery of the drone, which has a wingspan of 7.45 metres, will make it much easier for waverers on the Security Council to accept US and British arguments that Iraq has failed to meet UN demands that it disarm. “It’s incredible,” a senior diplomat from a swing voter on the council said. “This report is going to have a clearly defined impact on the people who are wavering. It’s a biggie.” An explicit report by Dr Blix of the discovery of an Iraqi violation would help the six swing voters — Angola, Cameroon, Chile, Guinea, Mexico and Pakistan — to explain a change of position to their publics. Unlike the outlawed Al-Samoud 2 missile, which was declared as a purportedly legal weapon, the drone was not declared. It would be the first undeclared weapons programme found by the UN and is considered by British and US officials to be a “smoking gun”.

Accuses spying { January 6 2003 } Blix accuses undermined inspectors { April 22 2003 } Blix attacks us war intelligence { April 22 2003 } Blix global warming bigger threat Blix iraq new cooperation { February 25 2003 } Blix no smoking gun { January 9 2003 } Blix report upbeat { March 8 2003 } Blix smeared by pentagon { June 11 2003 } Block inspections { September 20 2002 } Bush claims inspectors werent let in Bush not encouraging Bush refuses inspections { September 16 2002 } Capt.1038410395.mideast_iraq_un_lon109 [jpg] Cia sabotaged says democrats Dispute aluminum tubes { January 29 2003 } Doubts aluminum tubes { February 6 2003 } First inspections good Five minutes to midnight Inspect factory plant { December 4 2002 } Inspections get b Inspectors attack bush { December 6 2002 } Inspectors criticize cia data { March 8 2003 } Inspectors ordered out { March 17 2003 } Inspectors want 10 months { January 14 2003 } Iraq destroys missiles { March 1 2003 } Iraq dossier denies weapons { December 7 2002 } Iraq rejects plan { September 29 2002 } No nuclear threat { January 7 2003 } Perle doubts inspectors { November 13 2002 } Report undercuts us argument { January 28 2003 } Saddam supports inspectors Terrorist on un team { December 5 2002 } Un challenges bush progress { December 4 2002 } Un confirms missile destruction Us advises inspectors to leave { March 17 2003 } Us britian accuses blix { March 10 2003 } Us cite iraq breach Will fire spies Files Listed: 38

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.