NewsMine — war-on-terror — iraq — pre-invasion — britons — Viewing Item

Without britian { March 11 2003 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12774-2003Mar11.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12774-2003Mar11.html Rumsfeld Backtracks on British War Role in Iraq Reuters Tuesday, March 11, 2003; 9:47 PM By Charles Aldinger WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on Tuesday left open the possibility the United States might invade Iraq without the help of British forces, then quickly backtracked to quell the firestorm his remarks touched off. Pressed by reporters at a news briefing on whether Washington might go ahead without British military help because of rising political pressure on Prime Minister Tony Blair, Rumsfeld said it would be a decision for President Bush to make. "I think until we know what the (U.N.) resolution is, we won't know the answer as to what their role will be," Rumsfeld said. "And to the extent they are able to participate -- in the event that the president decides to use force -- that would obviously be welcomed. To the extent they're not, there are work-arounds and they would not be involved, at least in that phase..." "That is an issue that the president will be addressing in the days ahead, one would assume," he said in comments that one U.S. defense official said later caused "a firestorm" of reaction from British officials. And, four hours later, Rumsfeld issued a terse two-paragraph written statement expressing confidence that the forces of America's most prominent ally would be side-by-side with U.S. troops should an attack take place. "In the event that a decision to use force is made, we have every reason to believe there will be a significant military contribution from the United Kingdom," he said. 'NO DOUBT OF FULL SUPPORT' "I have no doubt of the full support of the United Kingdom for the international community's efforts to disarm Iraq. In my press briefing today, I was simply pointing out that obtaining a second United Nations Security Council Resolution is important to the United Kingdom and that we are working to achieve it." In London, a spokeswoman for British Prime Minister Tony Blair's office shrugged off the original remarks and said there had been several phone calls with Rumsfeld's staff, but could not say when. "Nothing has changed. We are working to get a second resolution. We are not yet at the stage of military action. Throughout there has been complete cooperation between the UK and the U.S. on military planning," she told Reuters. The United States and Britain have more than 250,000 troops gathered in the Gulf region around Iraq, but British Prime Minister Tony Blair has come under mounting anti-war pressure at home. A U.S decision to go it alone would be slap in the face for the beleaguered Blair who has gone out on a limb and sparked a revolt in his own Labour Party to support Bush in his hawkish stance on Iraq. Rumsfeld was asked at the Pentagon briefing by reporters whether the United States, with about 225,000 of its troops already in the Gulf region and thousands more on the way, might go ahead without Britain or whether Britain might scale back its participation. "This is a matter that most of the senior officials in the government discuss with the UK on a daily or every other day basis," said the secretary, adding that he had spoken with British Defense Minister Geoff Hoon by telephone "about an hour ago." WILLINGNESS TO COMPROMISE? Britain has recently appeared to show more willingness at the United Nations to compromise on a controversial new resolution which might authorize war against Baghdad. Rumsfeld seemed to suggest that it stemmed from political pressure. "Their situation is distinctive to their country and they have a government that deals with a parliament in their way, distinctive way," he told reporters. "And what will ultimately be decided is unclear as to their role, that is to say their role in the event a decision is made to use force. There is the second issue of their role in a post-Saddam Hussein reconstruction process, or stabilization process, which would be a different matter." Britain has committed about 42,000 military personnel, including ground troops, to the potential war effort but only about 25,000 are in the Gulf region so far, © 2003 Reuters

Blair campaign persuade bush united nations support Blair losing party Britain wont fight { March 12 2003 } British urges war delay Brits human shields { September 9 2002 } Bush biggest threat { November 14 2002 } Madness of dubya Parliament rift { February 27 2003 } Princes charles rift Spooks and military opposed { February 24 2003 } Without britian { March 11 2003 } Files Listed: 11

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.