|
Congress not advised { March 2 2002 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26212-2002Mar1.htmlhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26212-2002Mar1.html
Congress Not Advised Of Shadow Government
Bush Calls Security 'Serious Business'
By Amy Goldstein and Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, March 2, 2002; Page A01
Key congressional leaders said yesterday the White House did not tell them
that President Bush has moved a cadre of senior civilian managers to secret
underground sites outside Washington to ensure that the federal government
could survive a devastating terrorist attack on the nation's capital.
Senate Majority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (D-S.D.) said he had not been
informed about the role, location or even the existence of the shadow
government that the administration began to deploy the morning of the Sept.
11 hijackings. An aide to House Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt
(D-Mo.) said he similarly was unaware of the administration's move.
Among Congress's GOP leadership, aides to House Speaker J. Dennis
Hastert (Ill.), second in line to succeed the president if he became
incapacitated, and to Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott (Miss.) said they
were not sure whether they knew.
Aides to Sen. Robert C. Byrd (D-W. Va.) said he had not been told. As
Senate president pro tempore, he is in line to become president after the
House speaker.
Bush acknowledged yesterday that the administration had taken extensive
measures to guarantee "the continuity of government," after it was revealed
that about 100 top officials, spanning every executive branch department,
have been sent to live and work in two fortified locations on the East Coast.
This system, in which high-ranking administrators are rotating in and out of
the two sites, represents the first time a president has activated the
contingency plan, which was devised during the Cold War of the 1950s so
that federal rule could continue if Washington were struck by a catastrophic
attack.
It was unclear yesterday whether any federal documents -- prepared either
by the current White House or by Bush's predecessors dating to Dwight D.
Eisenhower -- specify whether congressional leaders should be told if the
plan is put into effect. At least one relatively general document, a 1988
executive order entitled "Assignment of Emergency Preparedness
Responsibilities," said the White House's National Security Council "shall
arrange for Executive branch liaison with, and assistance to, the Congress
and the federal judiciary on national security-emergency preparedness
matters."
The executive order, signed by President Ronald Reagan, is a precursor to
documents outlining the contingency plans in greater detail, which have not
been made public. Regardless of whether Bush had an obligation to notify
legislative leaders, the congressional leaders' ignorance of the plan he set in
motion could raise the question of how this shadow administration would
establish its legitimacy with Congress in the event it needed to step in for a
crippled White House.
At least some members of Congress suggested yesterday that the
administration should have conferred about its plans, which were first
reported in The Washington Post yesterday.
"There are two other branches of government that are central to the
functioning of our democracy," said Rep. William Delahunt (D-Mass.), a
member of the House Judiciary Committee. "I would hope the speaker and
the minority leader would at least pose the question, 'What about us?' "
Other lawmakers said they believe the federal government lacks adequate
plans to be certain that all three of its branches could function if terrorists
disabled Washington.
White House officials did not elaborate on why the president did not consult
with congressional leaders. "The president addressed this earlier today, and I
will have to refer you to his comments," spokesman Taylor Gross said.
Speaking yesterday on a trip to Des Moines, Bush did not describe the
deployment in detail. He said he had "an obligation as the president [to] put
measures in place that, should somebody be successful in attacking
Washington, D.C., [would guarantee] there's an ongoing government."
"This is serious business," the president said. "I still take the threats that we
receive from al Qaeda killers and terrorists very seriously." He made clear
the extent to which he believes that terrorism poses a lingering threat to the
U.S. government. "That's one reason why the vice president was going to
undisclosed locations," Bush told reporters.
"And I will tell you, there are people still in this world who want to harm
America," the president said, vowing that "we're doing everything in our
power to protect the American people."
At the Pentagon, which routinely rotates top military officials to secure
locations, spokeswoman Victoria Clarke said: "It is absolute common sense,
absolutely appropriate that the government should have all the parts and all
the pieces in place so in case of a crisis, in case of an emergency, the
government can and will continue to function."
The House and Senate each has a contingency plan. "Precautions have been
taken and arrangements have been made to move the work of Congress to
another location," Daschle said.
Bush made his remarks at the Printer Inc., a relatively small Des Moines
business that the White House chose as a backdrop to tout changes the
administration favors to the nation's pension laws. The printing plant assists
workers with 401(k) plans and encourages them to take an active role in
saving money for retirement.
For the second day in a row, Bush sought to draw attention to his plans for
what he has begun to call "retirement security," a combination of pension
changes and redesign of Social Security.
"You see, we're going to have to encourage more savings in America,
because people are going to live longer lives," Bush said.
Alluding to his more controversial view that workers should be allow to
invest some of their Social Security taxes in the stock market, Bush said:
"We ought to do everything we can in Washington, D.C., to encourage
people to own a piece of the future."
His visit to Iowa of slightly more than three hours followed a formula the
White House has used since New Year's, as the president has begun to
travel to states in which GOP candidates face tight races in the fall elections.
These visits combine a forum to promote one of the administration's
legislative priorities with a political fundraiser.
Bush attended a luncheon on behalf of Rep. Tom Latham (R-Iowa), a quiet
conservative first elected in the "Republican Revolution" of 1994. He has
easily won reelection since then, but his prospects are far less certain this
year because his district -- until now heavily Republican -- has been redrawn
to include more Democratic voters.
The luncheon raised $275,000 for Latham and $200,000 for the Iowa
Republican Party.
This was Bush's fourth trip to Iowa since becoming president. The state is
significant to the GOP's struggle to retain its majority in the House and to win
back control of the Senate this fall -- and to Bush's reelection aspirations in
two years. Bush narrowly lost the state to Vice President Al Gore in 2000.
Goldstein reported from Des Moines.
© 2002 The Washington Post Company
|
|
