NewsMine — security — legislation — budget — Viewing Item

Terror bill { May 22 2002 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A57236-2002May22.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A57236-2002May22.html House Passes $4.6 Billion Bioterror Bill By Janelle Carter The Associated Press Wednesday, May 22, 2002; 1:51 PM WASHINGTON – The House, trying "to think as evilly as we could," overwhelmingly passed a $4.6 billion bill Wednesday aimed at strengthening the nation's bioterrorism preparedness by stockpiling vaccines and boosting inspections of food coming across borders. The 425-1 vote capped a months-long effort sparked by post-Sept. 11 concerns that included anthrax-tainted letters sent to Capitol Hill. "We've tried to think as evilly as we could," said Rep. Billy Tauzin, R-La., a drafter of the bill. "What would the most evil person do to disrupt our health supply system or our clean water system? What would the most evil mind try to do if they learned how to fly a crop-duster? We went through that awful exercise of trying to think like the most evil person on earth." The bill, which authorizes the money over two years, gives the nation "a whole new arsenal," Tauzin said. Senate leaders hope to take up the bill before adjourning Friday for a weeklong recess, but it was uncertain whether they would get to it. Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., the bill's Senate negotiator, said the legislation means "Americans will be able to sleep better at night in the knowledge that our nation is taking the steps necessary to protect them and their families against the deadly threat of bioterrorism." States would get $1.6 billion in grants to prepare for a biological attack, using a formula included in the compromise. The House had wanted grant disbursement to be at the discretion of the health and human services secretary. The compromise also would have drinking water systems assess their vulnerability to terrorist attack, develop emergency plans and submit the plans to the Environmental Protection Agency. House Republicans had argued that the agency lacks the capacity to handle such sensitive information, but the compromise would establish strict security controls to protect the information. The bill also includes $300 million for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to upgrade its facilities. The compromise also would renew a law that allows the Food and Drug Administration to charge fees to pharmaceutical companies to pay for speedier review of new medications. Negotiators also included $45 million to help speed the review of generic drugs and $27 million to help the FDA monitor pharmaceutical advertising aimed at consumers. Both amounts would be spent over five years. The only vote against the bill was cast by Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas. © 2002 The Associated Press

Budget decifit { April 26 2002 } Budget deficit at record { February 1 2004 } Budget Bush signs 401b defense bill Business bonanza Congress approves 400b 2004 { May 23 2003 } Defense budget boost { February 4 2003 } Homeland 4 6b { June 12 2002 } Massive budget { April 15 2002 } No debt limit Pentagon missing 1trillion { May 18 2003 } Record budget Terror bill { May 22 2002 } Files Listed: 13

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.