News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page
NewsMine cabal-elite families rockefeller iraq-intelligence Viewing Item | Democratic memo called attack plan Original Source Link: (May no longer be active) http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/special_packages/iraq/7196600.htmhttp://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/special_packages/iraq/7196600.htm
Posted on Thu, Nov. 06, 2003 Democratic memo on Iraq inquiry called 'attack plan' By Greg Miller Los Angeles Times
WASHINGTON - A simmering political struggle behind the Senate inquiry of prewar intelligence on Iraq has boiled over publicly with the disclosure of a Democratic memo outlining strategies for "exposing the administration's dubious motives" behind the war.
The leaked memo, which was prepared by the staff of Sen. John D. "Jay" Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va., the vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, discusses ways that Democrats can steer the inquiry toward taking a more critical look at the White House.
It also indicates that Democrats intend to launch a separate independent probe of the administration's use of intelligence as the parties head into the height of the 2004 presidential election.
"Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq," the memo says. "Yet we have an important role to play in revealing the misleading, if not flagrantly dishonest, methods and motives of senior administration officials who made the case for unilateral pre-emptive war."
The tone of the memo could be embarrassing to Democrats and provides new ammunition for Republican complaints that Democrats are seeking to use the inquiry for political gain.
Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., the chairman of the intelligence committee, described the memo as a "slap in the face" to the bipartisan traditions of the committee and called the plan an effort to undercut the panel's investigation.
"It's an attack plan," Roberts said late Tuesday in an interview on Fox News Channel.
In a statement released by his press office, Roberts said the memo "exposes politics in its most raw form. ... It's a purely partisan document that appears to be a road map for how the Democrats intend to politicize what should be a bipartisan objective review of prewar intelligence."
Rockefeller also released a statement, acknowledging that the memo was written by his staff, but saying that it had not been approved "nor was it shared with any member of the Senate Intelligence Committee or anyone else."
"Having said that," Rockefeller added, "the memo clearly reflects staff frustration with the conduct of the ... investigation and the difficulties of obtaining information from the administration."
Rockefeller also took a swipe at those behind the leak of the memo, saying it "was likely taken from a wastebasket or through unauthorized computer access."
The disclosure is the latest sign of discord and partisan maneuvering on the committee, which began its investigation of the prewar intelligence on Iraq this summer.
Roberts has repeatedly indicated that he would like to limit the investigation to examining the performance of the CIA and other agencies. He has angered Democrats by making comments to the media suggesting that the probe is already "90 to 95 percent" finished and that certain conclusions have already been reached.
Democrats have argued that the probe should not be confined to the performance of the intelligence agencies, but should also examine whether the administration pressured analysts to reach certain conclusions or misrepresented intelligence findings to the public.
The memo was first reported Tuesday by conservative radio and television commentator Sean Hannity. Fox News Channel, where Hannity is co-host of a talk show, said it was provided by a source on the committee. A spokeswoman for Roberts denied he or his staff was behind the leak.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, www.intelligence.senate.gov
|
| Files Listed: 7 |
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information,
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|