News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMine9-11suspectsmoussaouigovernment-case-success-2004-2006 — Viewing Item


Us appeals ban on death penalty moussaoui case { December 3 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/03/national/03CND-TERR.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/03/national/03CND-TERR.html

December 3, 2003
U.S. Appeals Ban on Death Penalty in Moussaoui Case
By BRIAN KNOWLTON,
International Herald Tribune

WASHINGTON, Dec. 3 — Government lawyers asked a federal appeals court today to overturn a decision banning the death penalty for Zacarias Moussaoui, a confessed member of Al Qaeda who is charged with conspiring in the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. But judges questioned whether Mr. Moussaoui could get a fair trial if the government blocked him from questioning three Al Qaeda figures in his defense.

The lawyers asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, Va., to throw out a ruling made in Federal District Court in Alexandria, Va., that would bar the government from even seeking to link Mr. Moussaoui to the 2001 attacks unless such witnesses were allowed.

The Al Qaeda figures might reveal information of use to other terrorists, said Paul D. Clement, a lawyer for the government.

The government has maintained that the lower-court ruling could have a debilitating impact on the war on terror, threatening "the government's ability to prosecute any terrorists" for past or future attacks.

But a defense lawyer said today that the government sought to deprive Mr. Moussaoui of one of the most fundamental rights: a fair trial.

Mr. Clement, the deputy solicitor general, also told the court that it would be wrong for Mr. Moussaoui to profit from government advances in the war on terror by granting him access to the three men.

"What the defendant seeks is sort of a windfall" from the war on terrorism, Mr. Clement said.

The three judges, who are expected to rule within weeks, closely questioned lawyers for both sides.

Judge Karen J. Williams asked, "Is there no right" for Mr. Moussaoui to reach the witnesses and use their favorable testimony?

Mr. Clements said there was no constitutional right for defendants to benefit from such "a windfall."

But Frank Dunham, the public defender leading Mr. Moussaoui's legal team, said that windfalls happened all the time in criminal cases and that their fortuitous nature did not exclude their use.

Mr. Moussaoui had argued earlier, and a lower-court judge agreed, that he could not properly defend himself without the right to call witnesses who could cast doubt on the six charges against him, all of which seek to link him to the planning of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Mr. Moussaoui is the only person facing trial in a United States court on charges of conspiring in the suicide attacks on New York and Washington, which killed nearly 3,000 people.

Mr. Dunham asked whether the government should be able to seek the death penalty in connection with those attacks while blocking Mr. Moussaoui from calling witnesses with close knowledge of the planning of the attacks.

"The answer to that question is a resounding no," Mr. Dunham said. "Our system of American fair play and justice will not allow such a result."

He added, "This is more about who we are than it is about Moussaoui."

There seemed to be sympathy for that argument from the panel.

When Mr. Clement said the government could not make the witnesses available because they were part of a "military operation to prevent future terrorist attacks," Judge Roger L. Gregory asked, "At what point is national security so important that a person can't get a fair trial?"

On Oct. 2, Judge Leonie M. Brinkema of the Federal District Court in Alexandria issued the ruling that the government cannot seek death for Mr. Moussaoui unless it allows him to call the three detainees.

The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution sets out a defendant's right "to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor."

But Mr. Clement said the amendment did not allow for evidence to be given by foreign witnesses held outside the United States. The government has not said specifically where the men Mr. Moussaoui seeks as witnesses are being held, only that they are outside the United States.

Also, the government has held out the possibility of dropping the trial in civilian court and moving him to a military tribunal.

In a series of legal actions since the 2001 attacks, the government has defended its sweeping authority in dealing with terror suspects. But some critics have said that defendants' fundamental judicial rights have been trampled.

In a separate case, the Defense Department said on Tuesday that it would, after all, allow an American citizen of Saudi descent being held as an enemy combatant to consult with his lawyer, who is Mr. Dunham. The man, Yaser Esam Hamdi, has been held in military brigs, first in Virginia and now in Charleston, S.C., since April 2002, apparently after capture on an Afghan battlefield.

The Pentagon said that it had determined that giving Mr. Hamdi access to legal counsel would not compromise national security. The case, it added, "should not be treated as a precedent."

Mr. Moussaoui has admitted to being a follower of Osama bin Laden, the leader of Al Qaeda, and to training for a terror attack. But he has denied having a part in the Sept. 11 planning.

Mr. Moussaoui has said that the three men he seeks as witnesses — Ramzi bin al-Shibh and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, believed to have planned and coordinated the Sept. 11 attacks, and Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi, suspected of helping finance them — would bear him out.

Judge Brinkema expressed frequent exasperation with Mr. Moussaoui in the months he represented himself in her court, and she finally ruled that he had lost the right to do so, but she supported him in some crucial pretrial rulings.

Mr. Moussaoui was arrested in August 2001 on immigration charges after trainers at a Minnesota flight school grew suspicious when he requested lessons in piloting large airplanes. That December he was charged with taking part in a broad Qaeda conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism, including those of Sept. 11.



Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company


Airlines coached moussaoui witnesses to remove culpibility
Alqaeda figures deny Moussaoui role { June 17 2004 }
Angry judge questions death case against moussaoui { March 13 2006 }
Bush says moussaoui case over war goes on
Court lets moussaoui prosecution go forward { April 23 2004 }
Documents cast doubts over moussaoui 911 claim { April 21 2006 }
Electronic shocks on Moussaoui back during trial { April 17 2006 }
Families subject to horror recordings during Moussaoui trial { April 12 2006 }
Fbi agent says superiors ignored moussaoui warnings { March 20 2006 }
Fbi says no moussaoui reid evidence
Fbi supervisor admits never read moussaoui memo { March 22 2006 }
Judge raises possibility of mistrial in moussaoui sentence { March 13 2006 }
Lawyer emailed court transcripts to seven witnesses { March 15 2006 }
Lone juror jkept moussaoui alive { May 13 2006 }
Moussaoui 2005 planning to admit 911 role { April 19 2005 }
Moussaoui changes with testimony { March 30 2006 }
Moussaoui confession contradicts previous confession
Moussaoui disrupts sentencing declaring himself alqaeda
Moussaoui link to 911 in doubt
Moussaoui loses right to represent himself { November 15 2003 }
Moussaoui may get inmate access { September 14 2004 }
Moussaoui motions
Moussaoui now says binladen gave him approval { March 2005 }
Moussaoui roommate warned fbi { March 21 2006 }
Moussaoui says 911 confession was complete fabrication { May 8 2006 }
Moussaoui wants to recant guilty plea { May 9 2006 }
Moussaoui yelled god curse you all to jury { March 30 2006 }
Moussaui says rather die than spend life in jail { April 13 2006 }
New court blow to moussaoui { November 14 2003 }
No evidence of moussaoui reid hijack plot jury told
Prosecutor rivets courtroom with 911 transcript { February 2006 }
Terror suspects contradict moussaoui confession
Too many pretrial motions deemed insulting { November 15 2003 }
Trial of moussaoui to focus on 911 foreknowledge { November 14 2005 }
Us appeals ban on death penalty moussaoui case { December 3 2003 }
Why moussaoui confession doesnt add up { March 28 2006 }
Witness coached by prosecution in moussaoui trial { March 13 2006 }

Files Listed: 37



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple