News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinesecurityterror-suspects — Viewing Item


Osama driver fights tribunal in supreme court { November 7 2005 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/07/AR2005110700562.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/07/AR2005110700562.html

Supreme Court to Hear Tribunals Challenge

By Fred Barbash
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, November 7, 2005; 1:02 PM



The Supreme Court today agreed to hear a major case challenging the legality of the military commissions established by the Bush administration to try alleged terrorism suspects.

In agreeing to review the challenge brought on behalf of Salim Ahmed Hamdan, 34, a Yemeni mechanic who admits that he served as Osama bin Laden's driver, the justices rejected a plea from the government to hold off any consideration of the case until after proceedings against Hamdan are concluded.

Hamdan has been detained at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for the past 21 months and is accused of being a member of al Qaeda.

The fact that the court agreed to review the case does not guarantee a decision on the fundamental questions. The Supreme Court could avoid those questions by agreeing with the government that any substantive review should await the conclusion of the military commission proceedings against Hamdan.

In the alternative, the court could consider whether President Bush has exceeded his inherent powers as commander in chief and the powers granted to him by Congress after Sept. 11, 2001. The court could also decide whether Geneva Conventions governing the treatment of prisoners of war affords any legal protections to Guantanamo prisoners such as Hamdan.

Numerous organizations had filed friend-of-the-court briefs urging the Supreme Court to intervene in the Hamdan case. Among them was a group of retired generals and admirals, who argued that the administration's position "immediately and directly" endangers American soldiers and "undermines the laws of war."

It is the third Supreme Court case stemming from the government's claim of expansive power to deal with alleged terrorists.

In 2004, the court struck down key elements of the Bush administration's legal policy for its battle against terrorism, ruling in two cases that the executive branch does not have the authority to deprive U.S. citizens of their liberty without giving them a day in some type of court.

The court also ruled that each of the 595 alleged members of al Qaeda and the Taliban being held at Guantanamo has the right to ask a U.S. judge to set him free.

The case of Hamdan, a non-U.S. citizen, raises two fundamental issues. He contends that the president exceeded his legal and constitutional powers in establishing military commissions to try those held at Guantanamo. The commissions afford defendants few of the rights afforded to individuals tried either by the U.S. courts or conventional military courts.

Hamdan and his lawyers also contend that the Geneva Conventions governing treatment of prisoners of war may be enforced in federal court. Prisoners of war are supposed to be tried in courts-martial rather than by the less formal military commissions. Hamdan, who has claimed that he took his job solely for money and not for ideology, has sought a court-martial. But the administration has vigorously sought to avoid courts-martial, which have rules that make it more difficult to keep defendants from knowing all the evidence against them.

In today's action, the court said it would review a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that upheld the government's power, saying it was authorized by Congress when it gave Bush authority after Sept. 11, 2001, to "use all necessary and appropriate force" against terrorists and potential terrorists.

The appeals court also rejected the Geneva Convention argument.

Among the members of the appeals court panel was John G. Roberts, Jr., now chief justice. Roberts did not participate in today's action. That suggests, but does not guarantee, that he will recuse himself from considering the case as well.

The Justice Department, in opposing Hamdan's petition, argued that it was "premature." "Further proceedings before the military commission may make it unnecessary for this Court to address any number of the questions currently presented in the case," government lawyers said. "If the commission finds petitioner not guilty, the Court can avoid these issues altogether."

It contended, as well, the court interference in the proceedings would encroach on the president's authority as commander in chief as well as the powers granted to him by Congress after Sept. 11.

On the Geneva Convention issue, the government based its case on a 1950 Supreme Court ruling in Johnson v. Eistentrager , involving German nationals convicted by a military commission in China of violating the laws of war. Under that decision, the government contends, rights granted under the Geneva Convention are not enforceable in U.S. Courts.

2005 The Washington Post Company



albany-suspects
animal-rights-groups
arrests
canadian-detained-syria
coerced-confessions
detainees
enemy-combatants
guantanamo
lackawanna-six
patriot-act-snags-webmaster
torture
11 terror suspects disappear in US custody { October 12 2004 }
14 top terror suspects transferred to cuba { September 6 2006 }
4 jihad defendants granted bail
British arrest radical cleric US seeks { May 28 2004 }
Cat stevens on terrorist list
CIA avoids scrutiny of detainee treatment { March 3 2005 }
Cia secretly removes detainees from iraq { March 19 2004 }
Concerned judge keeps ex cia agent terrorist in jail
Detainees are drugged unnecessarily { May 14 2008 }
Detriot terror case collapse blow to bush
Doj details abuse of 911 detainees { December 18 2003 }
Ecoterrorists are fbi top domestic terror threat { January 18 2006 }
Fears of guantanamo mistranslations { October 7 2003 }
Feds hid potographs to win terror convictions { March 30 2006 }
Florida clears professor on jihad charges
Growing afghan prison rivals bleak guantanamo { February 26 2006 }
Guantanamo bay espionage charges
Guantanamo detainees of saudi pakistan nationality
Hamas leader awaiting trial after filming bridges { August 31 2004 }
Informer detriot { August 30 2002 }
Lawyer criticizes rules for tribunals { January 22 2004 }
Lawyer quits terror cases after death threat
Lodi mistrial after fbi has no proof of terror ties { April 25 2006 }
Man gets life for paintball { June 16 2004 }
Millennium bomber judge decries attacks on constitution { July 28 2005 }
New tapes show abuse of 911 detainees { December 19 2003 }
Osama driver fights tribunal in supreme court { November 7 2005 }
Prosecutor charged with hiding evidence in terror case { March 30 2006 }
Prosecutor sues ashcroft for mismanaging terror cases { February 19 2004 }
Rewriting of detention military law { October 24 2004 }
Richard reid accomplice arrested { December 3 2003 }
Richard reid [jpg]
Rumsfeld admits secret detentions { June 18 2004 }
Shifts terror threat preparation to urban areas { January 4 2006 }
Singer cat stevens plane diverted by homeland security
Suspects disappeared in secret cia custody
Suspects lawyer convincted for helping terrorists { February 10 2005 }
Terror detainees in england win lords appeal { December 16 2004 }
Terror suspect given citizenship
Terror suspects guilty by association
Terrorism charges dropped against 2 in detriot { September 3 2004 }
Us holds terror suspects at secret locations says redcross
Us wins trial detroit sleeper cell { June 3 2003 }
Wgitmo1129 [jpg]

Files Listed: 44



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple