News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinesecurityprison-incarcerationdeathpenalty — Viewing Item


Innocent individuals are executed { August 11 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/11/national/11CND-DEAT.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/11/national/11CND-DEAT.html
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0812-01.htm

August 11, 2003
Federal Judge Expresses Concern About Death Penalty
By ADAM LIPTAK

A federal judge in Boston voiced alarm today that imposing the death penalty "will inevitably result in the execution of innocent people." But he declined to rule that that the death penalty is unconstitutional.

"In the past decade," the judge, Mark L. Wolf, wrote, "substantial evidence has emerged to demonstrate that innocent individuals are sentenced to death, and undoubtedly executed, much more often that previously understood."

He cited the exonerations of more than 100 people on death row based on DNA and other evidence.

"The day may come," Judge Wolf continued, "when a court properly can and should declare the ultimate sanction to be unconstitutional in all cases. However, that day has not yet come."

That means the case against Gary Lee Sampson, including the capital charges, will now to trial in September. Mr. Sampson has acknowledged responsibility for three murders. In the space of a few days in 2001, he killed three men who had picked him up hitchhiking.

Judge Wolf, a former federal prosecutor and Justice Department official, was appointed to the bench by President Ronald Reagan. He appeared critical of recent changes in the Justice Department's practices in seeking the death penalty.

"Juries have recently been regularly disagreeing with the attorney general's contention that the death penalty is justified in the most egregious federal cases involving murder," he wrote.

In 16 of the last 17 federal capital prosecutions, Judge Wolf wrote, juries rejected the death penalty. One of Mr. Sampson's lawyers, David A. Ruhnke, said Judge Wolf's numbers are outdated. He said the count now stands at 19 acquittals or life verdicts in the last 20 cases.

The most recent acquittals came earlier this month in Puerto Rico. Like Massachusetts, Puerto Rico does not have the death penalty. Thirty-eight states do.

"These recent verdicts," Judge Wolf wrote, "raise the question of whether the Department of Justice is properly employing its stated standards in deciding to seek the death penalty."

The acquittals and life sentences are evidence, Judge Wolf continued, of an evolving societal consensus against the death penalty that courts may take account of in deciding whether capital punishment violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

"If juries continue to reject the death penalty in the most egregious federal cases," he wrote, "the courts will have significant objective evidence that the ultimate sanction is not compatible with contemporary standards of decency."

He also noted that the department's policies about whether to take into account local opposition to the death penalty have changed. Until 2001, the policies said that the absence of a local death penalty did not by itself justify a federal capital prosecution. That has changed.

"It appears," Judge Wolf wrote, "that the fact that a state's laws do not authorize capital punishment may now alone be deemed sufficient to justify a federal death penalty prosecution."

A Justice Department spokeswoman did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

Only one federal jury has sentenced a defendant to death in a jurisdiction that does not have its own death penalty since the federal death penalty was reinstated in 1988. That was in Michigan in 2002.

The only other judge to hear a federal death penalty prosecution in Massachusetts in recent years later described what he had learned in The Boston Globe.

"The experience," Judge Michael Ponsor wrote, "left me with one unavoidable conclusion: that a legal regime relying on the death penalty will inevitably execute innocent people not too often, one hopes, but undoubtedly sometimes."



Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top


1000th execution is white while black spared
8th ncarolina death row inmate freed { May 6 2008 }
Ashcroft pursues death { July 1 2002 }
California and florida suspend executions after botch
Court overturns 100 death sentences { September 2 2003 }
Death penalty flawed { June 12 2000 }
Death penalty suspended in new york
Death row evidence deliberately falsified by police { May 6 2006 }
Dna clears death row inmate { April 22 2003 }
Dna evidence destroyed in death penalty case { November 30 2005 }
Doctors refusal cause execution postponed indefinitely
Fed penalty unconstitutional { July 2 2002 }
Federal unconstitutional { September 24 2002 }
Governor orders innocence test of executed man { January 6 2006 }
Halt executions { May 16 2002 }
Innocent individuals are executed { August 11 2003 }
Jury only { June 25 2002 }
Justice stevens cites serious flaws in use of death penalty { August 8 2005 }
Lethal injections cause agonizingly painful deaths { April 15 2005 }
Md death penalty { May 10 2002 }
Md death racial { January 8 2003 }
Md study disparities
Mentally retarded { June 21 2002 }
Mounting evidence innocent people death penalty
North carolina executions on hold { February 20 2007 }
Us accuses germany undermining death penalty { November 14 2000 }
Us courts overturns 100 death sentences { September 2 2003 }
Us violated mexicans rights on death row
Witness clears man executed in texas in 1993 { November 22 2005 }

Files Listed: 29



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple