News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinewar-on-terrorsaudi-arabia — Viewing Item


Saudis accuse british staff of destabilisation { September 7 2002 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.guardian.co.uk/saudi/story/0,11599,787811,00.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/saudi/story/0,11599,787811,00.html

Embassy blamed for bombings
Saudis accuse British staff of destabilisation campaign

Paul Kelso and David Pallister
Saturday September 7, 2002
The Guardian

British embassy staff in Riyadh have been accused by the Saudi Arabian authorities of coordinating a campaign of anti-western terrorist bombings in the kingdom, the Guardian has learned.
The accusation that the British embassy in Riyadh coordinated the bombings to destabilise the Saudi regime is the latest and most bizarre piece of information to escape the pall of secrecy behind which the Saudis have been conducting legal proceedings against seven westerners who say they have been tortured into making false confessions.

Two Britons have been killed and several other westerners maimed or injured since November 2000 in a bombing campaign widely believed to be the work of anti-western extremists.

The allegation against the British mission in Riyadh, confirmed yesterday by the Foreign Office, was at the heart of the prosecution case against five Britons, a Canadian and a Belgian detained in the kingdom.

In televised "confessions" broadcast last year, six of the men said they had been "ordered" to carry out the attacks but did not say by whom.

A Guardian investigation this year discredited the case against the men and uncovered evidence of systematic torture by ministry of interior officials.

In a prosecution document presented to a panel of Saudi judges last year, ministry investigators claimed the men were acting on orders from British embassy officials. The men were subsequently convicted and received sentences ranging from eight years in prison to the death penalty.

The allegation that the British embassy was accused of involvement in the terrorist campaign will embarrass the Foreign Office, which is wary of being seen to criticise its closest Arab ally.

Yesterday the Foreign Office denied the allegations against its officials: "We have been aware of the allegations against embassy staff for some time. The allegations were investigated by members of the Metropolitan police [visiting Riyadh] and their firm conclusion was that they were groundless."

According to defence papers submitted by way of appeal to the Saudi supreme court last month and seen by the Guardian the men were systematically tortured until they confessed.

They were subjected to sleep deprivation for up to 10 days at a time, suspended from chains hanging from hooks above their cell doors and repeatedly beaten. They were told their relatives would be harmed if they did not cooperate and were offered early release in exchange for confessions.

The document also reveals that:

· The officer in charge of the investigation and prosecution did not speak a foreign language, and the translator had only a rudimentary knowledge of English.

· Despite being appointed in October 2000 the men's lawyers were not permitted to present their defence until last month.

· The lawyers have been denied access to the investigation reports or any other related documents.

· The detainees were not told they were standing trial when they first appeared before judges last year. They still have not been told that they have been found guilty and sentenced.

· Lawyers were unable to get statements from the men because they were denied access to pencils and paper in prison. Notes the men took during interviews with the lawyers were confiscated.

· There are "striking resemblances" between the phrases used in the "confessions".

· The men were kept in solitary confinement for up to a year after their "confessions".

The men's lawyers expect the supreme court to make an initial ruling by the end of month.




may12-03-attacks
Al qaeda aimds topple saudi royals { November 10 2003 }
Alqaeda arms traced saudi national guard { May 19 2003 }
Alqaeda suspects blow selves up in mecca { November 6 2003 }
Bomb explosion immediately after terror alert { November 9 2003 }
Briefing depicted saudis as enemies backing terrorism { August 6 2002 }
Chaos in saudi arabia { May 15 2003 }
Forceful and flawed leader king fahd dies { August 1 2005 }
Mercenaries inc { November 13 1995 }
Moroccans planned saudi suicide flight { May 21 2003 }
Nov03 suicide attack kills 11 { November 9 2003 }
Pakistan saudiarabia secret nuke pact
Questions 12000 citizens { August 15 2003 }
Saudi arabia allows women working to boost economy { June 7 2004 }
Saudi attack targets foriegners { May 30 2004 }
Saudi depicted enemy { August 6 2002 }
Saudi enemies { August 6 2002 }
Saudi fall
Saudi memorial weekend terror rampage
Saudi national guard weapons probe
Saudi prince hires female airline pilot { January 31 2006 }
Saudi says kills 10 militants in 2 days of raids
Saudi view disavowed { August 7 2002 }
Saudis accuse british staff of destabilisation { September 7 2002 }
Saudis consider nuclear bomb { September 18 2003 }
Saudis control funding of islamic extremist groups { March 7 2004 }
Saudis deny pakistan nuclear pact
Saudis find deep network of terror cells { August 14 2003 }
Saudis win backing for anti terror center
Terrorist car bomb kills saudi { April 21 2004 }
Two americans killed in saudi arabia
US gives saudis 20b in weapons { June 2007 }
Us intensifies warning on terrorism in saudi arabia { December 17 2003 }
Us knew attack was likely
Us leads arms sales saudis are buying
Us pulls saudi diplomats under threats
US rebukes Saudis on religious rights violations
Us urges saudi cooperation after blast

Files Listed: 37



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple