|
British and americans cover up for ISI { October 4 2006 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
http://www.metimes.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20061004-025825-9676rhttp://www.metimes.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20061004-025825-9676r
Commentary: Pakistan and the terror nexus
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed
October 4, 2006
LONDON -- Poor old General Musharraf. His PR trip trying to rehabilitate the image of Pakistan around the world appears to have been slightly scuppered by the leak of the now widely-reported UK Defense Academy paper.
Notwithstanding the predictable chorus of denial from the corridors of power, namely, from those who for all intents and purposes stand accused (at the current time Musharraf, Tony Blair, George W. Bush, etc.), the leaked report is entirely consistent with a wealth of evidence in the public record.
The leaked report, authored by a British intelligence official with a military background, is based on interviews with Pakistani army officers and academics. BBC News has flagged-up one of the most important sections of the document, which says:
"The army's dual role in combating terrorism and at the same time promoting the MMA [parliamentary coalition opposition grouping] and so indirectly supporting the Taliban [through Pakistan's military intelligence, the ISI] is coming under closer and closer international scrutiny. Pakistan is not currently stable but on the edge of chaos.
[The West has] turned a blind eye toward existing instability and the indirect protection of Al Qaeda and promotion of terrorism. Indirectly Pakistan [through the ISI] has been supporting terrorism and extremism - whether in London on 7/7 or in Afghanistan or Iraq.
The US/UK cannot begin to turn the tide until they identify the real enemies from attacking ideas tactically - and seek to put in place a more just vision. This will require Pakistan to move away from army rule and for the ISI to be dismantled and more significantly something to be put in its place.
Musharraf knows that time is running out for him ..."
The instrumental role that Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) has played in fomenting international terrorism is well-documented. This paper from an MoD-run think-tank shows clearly that senior intelligence officials are privately so concerned about this problem, that they are leaking the material at this time precisely to counter Musharraf's latest round of PR exercises in the USA and elsewhere.
In The War on Freedom (2002), The War on Truth (2005), and The London Bombings (2006), I've described in some detail Pakistan's role in supplying military, intelligence, and logistical support to terrorist networks linked to 9/11, 7/7, and even Iraq.
What's most disturbing about it, is that this is hardly a ground-breaking revelation. On pages 102-3 of The London Bombings, I quote from two US Defense Intelligence Agency documents dated from two weeks after 9/11, which I had obtained after their declassification in September 2003.
Five years ago, these intelligence reports had noted how "Bin Laden's Al Qaeda network was able to expand under the safe sanctuary extended by Taliban following Pakistan directives."
Bin Laden's camp, for example, located on the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan, "was built by Pakistani contractors, funded by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Directorate." The Taliban regime "was created, imposed, and recognized by Pakistan in pursuit of its own interests, and under its jurisdiction, Al Qaeda was "able to grow unmolested inside Afghanistan."
But what about after 9/11? The Pentagon agency continues:
"Pakistan's goals are simple, the continuance of the policy they have always demonstrated regarding Afghanistan ... In Islamabad, they have tried to ignore or bury the evidence for some time. It must be a deeply troubling period for General [Musharraf] in Pakistan, who is asked to help hunt down the culprits that he helped to establish and supported.
Not to support the US invites trouble and to assist the US to their aims also presents problems to Pakistan. The quandary leaves the Pakistanis confused as to how they might be absolved without permanently shattering their regional aspirations or their government."
Five years later, it seems that little has changed. So what's been the response from the British and American governments? Instead of taking the drastic action advised by the Defense Academy report - such as investigating and even dismantling the Pakistani ISI - Blair and Bush, following in the footsteps of their predecessors, continue not only to actively attempt to conceal the ISI's criminal complicity from public understanding, but worse still also to escalate the provision of financial, military, and intelligence support to the ISI.
The record is almost absurd, with Musharraf rounding up thousands of militants one day, and then releasing them without charge the next, meanwhile continuing to provide covert financial and military assistance.
There's a lot of history here that needs to be recalled to grasp the significance of this. Such as the oft-ignored fact that former ISI Director, Gen. Mahmoud Ahmad, had ordered Al Qaeda finance chief Ahmed Omar Sheikh Saeed to wire at least $100,000 to chief 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta prior to the terrorist attacks on the WTC and Pentagon.
This is one of those awkward, deeply uncomfortable stories that the mainstream tried to ignore, revealed at first by Indian intelligence officers cited in the Times of India (who obviously have the motive to dish the dirt on their Pakistani neighbors), but subsequently confirmed repeatedly by American (e.g. Wall Street Journal) and even Pakistani government and intelligence officials (e.g. Dawn).
The thrust of the matter is that neither Al Qaeda veteran Sheikh Saeed - a British Muslim by the way - nor Gen. Mahmoud Ahmad have been indicted or even remotely officially investigated for their complicity in the financial organization of the 9/11 attacks.
Former labor minister Michael Meacher MP pointed out the huge and dangerous ramifications of the Pakistani connection in a Guardian piece published just over a year before 7/7. "It is extraordinary," he observes, "that neither Ahmed nor Sheikh have been charged and brought to trial on this count [of financing 9/11]. Why not?"
Ironically, Musharraf has provided an inkling of an answer to this question recently, in the wake of the Defense Academy leak, apparently in an attempt to launch his own PR counter-offensive by leaking confidential and embarrassing information available to the ISI. The Gulf Times reports one of the particularly interesting, and damning tid-bits from Musharraf's new book In the Line of Fire:
"Pakistan President General Pervez Musharraf has disclosed that Omar Sheikh, who kidnapped and murdered American journalist Daniel Pearl and is now facing death penalty, was actually the British secret Agency MI6's agent and had executed certain missions on their behest before coming to Pakistan and visiting Afghanistan to meet Osama and Mullah Omar.
"General Musharraf has written in his book that while Omar Sheikh was at the London School of Economics (LSE), he was recruited by the British intelligence agency MI6, which persuaded him to take an active part in demonstrations against Serbian aggression in Bosnia and even sent him to Kosovo to join the jihad. At some point, he probably became a rogue or double agent.
"The local media is discussing the possibility that Omar would use evidence from President Musharraf's memoirs to save himself from the hangman."
There are those who might doubt the word of Musharraf, and who can blame them? But in fact I documented Omar Sheikh Saeed's simultaneous intelligence connections to the CIA, ISI, and MI6 in The War on Truth and The London Bombings. Details have come forth from an intriguing combination of American, British, and Pakistani government sources.
Readers of my 7/7 work will begin to see an unnervingly familiar pattern here. As I explained on "Generation 7/7," a Channel 4 learning documentary that has been aired several times since the 7/7 anniversary (including last week), the suspected 7/7 mastermind Al Qaeda fixer Haroon Rashid Aswat is also an MI6 double agent according to American intelligence officials.
When former Justice Department prosecutor John Loftus came on Fox News last year and revealed the extent to which MI6 had been protecting Aswat from our own police services and the CIA, the official story shifted suddenly and inexplicably.
Police spokesmen, who had previously described in detail the telephone records of Aswat's extensive conversations with alleged chief London bomber Mohammed Sidique Khan, summarily denied that Aswat had any connection at all to 7/7. The shift in reporting happened precisely to conceal the embarrassing revelation that the failure to apprehend Aswat, was due to the active obstruction of attempts to apprehend him, by our very own MI6.
As Michael Meacher MP also noted, the subject of Musharraf's revelations - Ahmed Omar Sheikh Saeed - may well have also been connected to the planning of the 7/7 atrocities. He notes "reports from Pakistan" suggesting "that Sheikh continues to be active from jail, keeping in touch with friends and followers in Britain."
Although this is hardly surprising, given Sheikh's incestuous relationship with Pakistani military intelligence, it is utterly disturbing. Why do our governments continue to refuse to investigate this issue?
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed is Executive Director of the Institute for Policy Research & Development, London, UK. He teaches courses in political theory, international relations, and contemporary history at the School of Social Sciences and Cultural Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. He is the author of The London Bombings: An Independent Inquiry, The War on Freedom: How and Why America was Attacked, September 11, 2001 and Behind the War on Terror: Western Secret Strategy and the Struggle for Iraq. His latest book is The War On Truth: 9/11, Disinformation And The Anatomy Of Terrorism. Acknowledgement to Media Monitors Network (MMN)
|
|
