News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinewar-on-terroriraqtour-of-duty — Viewing Item


Female soldiers eyed for combat

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.washtimes.com/national/20041022-120846-1796r.htm

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20041022-120846-1796r.htm

Female soldiers eyed for combat

By Rowan Scarborough
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The Army is negotiating with civilian leaders about eliminating a women-in-combat ban so it can place mixed-sex support companies within warfighting units, starting with a division going to Iraq in January.
Despite the legal prohibition, Army plans already have included such collocation of women-men units in blueprints for a lighter force of 10 active divisions, according to Defense Department sources.
An Army spokesman yesterday, in response to questions from The Washington Times, said the Army is now in discussions with Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's staff to see whether the 10-year-old ban in this one area should be lifted. The ban prohibits the Army from putting women in units that "collocate" with ground combatants.

"When that policy was made up, there was a different threat," said Lt. Col. Chris Rodney, an Army spokesman at the Pentagon. "We imagined a more linear combat environment. Now, with the nature of asymmetrical threats, we have to relook at that policy."
Col. Rodney cited the fighting in Iraq as typifying the new threat whereby all soldiers, support or combat, face attack by rockets, mortars, roadside bombs and ambushes.
"Everybody faces a similar threat," he said. "There is no front-line threat right now."
Since the invasion of Iraq in March 2003, the Army has suffered 793 combat deaths, including 24 female soldiers.
The Army is not seeking to lift the ban on women in direct combat units, such as infantry or armor.
What is being examined is the part of the exclusion rule that says mixed-sex support companies may not be positioned with ground combat teams.
In the disputed instance, the transformation plan of Gen. Peter Schoomaker, the Army chief of staff, calls for creating Forward Support Companies, which are made up of men and women. These companies would collocate with reconnaissance squadrons, which are combat units and are part of larger brigade "units of action."
The problem is a 1994 ban signed by then-Defense Secretary Les Aspin that excludes women from land combat units. Mr. Aspin added an additional restriction. Women could not serve "where units and positions are doctrinally required to physically collocate and remain with direct ground combat units that are closed to women."
Some Pentagon officials, who asked not to be named, said the proposed Forward Support Companies are at the least "skirting" the existing ban if not violating it. They suspect the new units are a way to inch women closer to land combat despite Congress' prohibition against it.
Elaine Donnelly, who leads the pro-military Center for Military Readiness, says Congress needs to be informed of the Army's plans.
"There is a law requiring notice to Congress that has not happened, and there are regulations that forbid the Army from taking infantry units and collocating gender-integrated units with them," said Mrs. Donnelly, who opposes women in combat. "If they are doing this, putting women in land combat units would be a violation of law and policy."
The Pentagon long has banned women from combat roles. In the early 1990s, the new Clinton administration changed the rules by allowing women for the first time to serve on combat ships and pilot combat aircraft, such as jet fighters and helicopters.
But the Pentagon retained the ban on women participating in direct combat and issued the new Aspin rules.
Mr. Aspin said in a January 1994 memo to the services that "women should be excluded from assignment to units below the brigade level whose primary mission is to engage in direct combat on the ground." The policy then defined direct combat as "engaging an enemy on the ground with individual or crew-served weapons, while being exposed to hostile fire and to a high probability of direct physical contact with the hostile force's personnel. Direct combat takes place well forward on the battlefield while locating and closing with the enemy to defeat them by fire, maneuver, or shock effect."
Mr. Aspin then went further in denying collocation of mixed-sex and combat units. The Army accepted the limitation, documents show.
The 3rd Infantry Division, which played a major role in the fall of Baghdad in April 2003, is scheduled to return to Iraq early next year. It would be the first division to be reconfigured into "units of action" that would contain the new mixed-sex Forward Support Companies.
In all, Gen. Schoomaker is increasing the number of combat brigades from 33 to 48, and naming them "units of action." The brigades are being married up permanently with support units so they can move out more quickly to war zones, instead of waiting for the additional personnel to arrive.
Early in the Bush administration, Mrs. Donnelly successfully persuaded the Pentagon to restrict female soldiers from certain reconnaissance units after Army planners had penciled them into those new units.



soldiers-mental-toll
15 000 more troops iraq { May 16 2003 }
1700 soliders have deserted in iraq { December 5 2003 }
20 000 more troops
6 louisiana national guard soldiers mourned { January 11 2005 }
63 percent voters call for immediate troop withdrawal
Abandoned pets problem while troops gone { April 12 2005 }
America will stay in iraq says bush
Army accepting more recruits with felonies { April 22 2008 }
Army allows criminals for recruitment
Army captain sues government about iraq assignment
Army covers up soldier dissenters assassination
Army keeping soldiers on duty { June 2 2004 }
Army misses recruitment by 42 percent { May 16 2005 }
Army not meeting recruiting goals { February 21 2005 }
Army orders mother of 7 to duty { November 9 2003 }
Army plans to keep troop level through 2006 { January 25 2005 }
Army raises enlistment age for reservists { March 21 2005 }
Army recalling thousands who left service
Army recruiter threatens warrant on recruitee { May 11 2005 }
Army reserve becoming broken force says general { January 6 2005 }
Army reserve fears troop exodus
Army sergeant refused iraq duty charged with desertion
Army spread thin caling on same units
Army stop loss prevents soliders from leaving army { January 28 2006 }
Army trying to keep troops from leaving { January 5 2004 }
Army will ease standards for recruits { October 1 2004 }
Awol desserters crisis hits armed forces
Black army recruits down 41perc since 2000 { March 6 2005 }
British troops may stay 10 years
Delayed troop return frustrates families
Draft discussed by senator on hill
Female soldiers eyed for combat
Fewer army recruits lined up { July 22 2004 }
Franks US stay for years { July 10 2003 }
Ged no longer required for recruitment { September 20 2005 }
General war has not ended { May 30 2003 }
GI bill cant cover soldiers community college { April 29 2008 }
Gis want home { August 10 2003 }
Iraq combat veterans committing increased homicides { January 13 2008 }
Kennedy calls for troops withdrawal
Low morale plagues us troops in iraq
Marine suicide by cop rather than return to iraq
Marines come up short on recruits { February 3 2005 }
Marines to reactive thousands reserves { July 2006 }
Military opposes draft bill introduced by democrat
Mississippi guardsmen denied leave for katrina { September 11 2005 }
National guard 10 year record lows on recruiting { July 25 2005 }
National guard recruiting slips
National guard shipped { June 26 2002 }
National guard treated like prisoners { November 25 2004 }
New generation of homeless vets emerges { December 2008 }
Pentagon delays us troops trip home
Pentagon extends tour of duty for 6500 soldiers { October 30 2004 }
Reservist commits suicide over city job { March 19 2004 }
Reservists may face longer tours of duty { January 7 2005 }
Reservists reservations { September 26 2002 }
Returned iraq veteran soldier fires at police officer { July 23 2007 }
Returning soldiers traumatized by occupation
Scores denies leave time to displaced katrina families { September 11 2005 }
Seattle high school attempts banning recruiters { May 18 2005 }
Seventh day adventist marine jailed { January 5 2005 }
Sick wounded us troops wait months barracks
Soldier paid to get shot to avoid iraq { August 15 2007 }
Soldier sues US military over extended service
Soldier who married iraqi to be discharged { December 1 2003 }
Soldiers are threatened with iraq duty
Soldiers contest stop loss policy in court { December 6 2004 }
Soldiers marry iraqi women
Soldiers returning hard time to adjust { September 12 2003 }
Soldiers sued over forced extension of service { October 20 2004 }
Soldiers trying not to report
States helpding guardsman because fed wont { January 19 2005 }
Strained army extends tours to 15 months { April 12 2007 }
Thousands of soldiers older than 50 deployed { October 17 2004 }
Top democrats call for iraq pullout
Tour of duty extended reserve forces
Troop r and r budget wont cover costs
Troops buy their own body armor { September 30 2005 }
Troops have tough questions for rumsfeld { December 8 2004 }
Troops questioned rumsfeld on long deployments { December 8 2004 }
Troops return after 2 years { January 4 2004 }
Troops to stay assignment seven years
Unconfirmed mutiny in iraq
Us forces extended tours duty
US soldier suicide rate highest for 26 years { August 16 2007 }
Us troops question presence in iraq { October 17 2003 }
War veterans neglected abused at top medical facility { February 18 2007 }
Worst recruiting years for army in decades { September 30 2005 }

Files Listed: 88



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple