| Army keeping soldiers on duty { June 2 2004 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active) http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/02/international/middleeast/02CND-SOLD.html?hphttp://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/02/international/middleeast/02CND-SOLD.html?hp
June 2, 2004 Army Expanding Program to Keep Soldiers on Duty By DAVID STOUT WASHINGTON, June 2 — Tens of thousands of soldiers bound for Iraq and Afghanistan will have to remain in the service after their originally scheduled discharge dates, the Army said today.
The move, which will probably mean several months' more time in the military than the soldiers had anticipated, will affect units that are within 90 days of deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan, Lt. Gen. Franklin Hagenbeck told reporters at the Pentagon.
Although unit commanders will be able to make exceptions for individuals with special circumstances, most soldiers will not be able to leave the service or transfer to different units until after their return to their home bases from Iraq and Afghanistan, said General Hagenbeck, the Army's deputy chief of staff for personnel.
Reginald Brown, the assistant Army secretary for manpower and reserve affairs, said in a statement that the service had to put the "stop loss" policy into effect "to ensure our formations remain a cohesive element throughout their deployment."
Or, as General Hagenbeck put it, the idea "is to have cohesive, trained units going to war together."
There are now about 138,000 American troops in Iraq. The continuing violence in that country, as well as the United States presence in Afghanistan, has put severe strains on units.
Mr. Brown said that if the stop-loss policy were not used, an average division would have to acquire more than 4,000 soldiers from other units to bring itself up to strength. In other words, each division would be replacing as many as one-fourth of its soldiers, sapping it of the cohesiveness prized by commanders.
Necessary or not, the stop-loss policy has been criticized as running counter to the spirit of an all-volunteer military service, since thousands of men and women who thought they had a firm retirement or discharge date will now be away from their families, homes and civilian lives longer than they had planned.
In today's New York Times, Andrew Exum, a former Army captain who served in Afghanistan, said the soldiers caught in the stop-loss program are being subjected to "shameful" treatment and might as well have been drafted.
"Many if not most of the soldiers in this latest Iraq-bound wave are already veterans of several tours in Iraq and Afghanistan," he wrote on the Op-Ed page of The Times. "They have honorably completed their active duty obligations. But like draftees, they have been conscripted to meet the additional needs in Iraq."
Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
|
|