News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinewar-on-terroriraqpretextwmd — Viewing Item


Blair admits weapons may never be found { January 12 2004 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1120997,00.html

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1120997,00.html

Blair admits weapons of mass destruction may never be found

Sarah Hall, Richard Norton-Taylor and Julian Borger in Washington
Monday January 12, 2004
The Guardian

Tony Blair yesterday signalled that weapons of mass destruction may never be found in Iraq, in his first admission of fallibility over the central justification he gave for going to war with Iraq.

In his most downbeat assessment of the contentious issue so far, the prime minister said he did not know whether WMD would be unearthed, and conceded that this flew in the face of widespread initial expectations.

"I do not know is the answer," he admitted. "I believe that we will but I agree there were many people who thought we were going to find this in the course of the actual operation ... We just have to wait and see".

The prime minister's admission - the latest shift in a gradual lowering of expectations - came in a wide-ranging interview on BBC 1's Breakfast with Frost programme.

Asked by the veteran broadcaster if the claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction - the basis on which he took the country to war - was wrong, he replied: "Well, you can't say that at this point in time".

He said that he had acted on intelligence on Saddam Hussein's programmes, and stressed that, throughout the conflict, the chief of defence staff, General Sir Michael Walker, had also believed this.

"The chief of defence staff and other people were saying well, we think we might have potential WMD finds here or there. Now these things didn't actually come to anything in the end - but I don't know is the answer."

Mr Blair's uncharacteristically flat response, in an interview in which he was bullish about top-up fees and the Hutton inquiry, spoke volumes about his diminishing certainty that WMD would be found. He pointedly failed to refer to the weekend discovery of 36 shells containing chemical agents in the Iraq desert north of Basra, believed to be remnants from the Iran-Iraq war.

The prime minister's admission of doubt marks a significant shift in his public stance on the weapons issue.

In September 2002, he told the Commons that "Saddam's weapons of mass destruction programme is active, detailed and growing", a stance with which he persisted as he took the nation to war in March last year.

As recently as last June, he told MPs he had "no doubt" they would "find the clearest possible evidence of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction", though he watered down this claim to "WMD programmes" the following month.

But with the Iraq Survey Group which is leading the hunt reporting in September that it had uncovered no weapons of mass destruction, he slid further, to speaking about evidence of "clandestine laboratories".

A similar erosion of confidence has been evident within the intelligence community. "There may be small quantities, and maybe not," a well-placed Whitehall official said yesterday, in stark contrast to the note struck by the joint intelligence committee and MI6 before, during and immediately after the war.

Britain's intelligence community now realise they face a huge credibility problem which could have far-reaching and damaging consequences already manifested by the widespread scepticism that greeted the decision over the new year to cancel British Airways flights to the US.

Senior Whitehall officials are now falling back on the argument that ministers, in their determination to go to war, should never have relied so much on intelligence in the first place.

Intelligence, they say, is almost always a question of assessment and judgment, and not hard facts.

That should have been clear when the government published its Iraqi weapons dossier in September 2002, they imply.

Political opponents reacted to Mr Blair's shift in ground with a mixture of bemusement and derision.

"Once again Tony Blair is hedging his bets," said the shadow foreign secretary, Michael Ancram. "The prime minister should come clean, and explain whether his previous claim to have evidence of weapons of mass destruction was yet another fabrication, and if not what that evidence was."

Paul Keetch, the Liberal Democrat defence spokesman, said it was "disingenuous" to blame intelligence reports when the prime minister had taken the decision to embark on the conflict. "Intelligence is not an exact science. But if he is now saying he's unsure whether there were WMD or not, one would have assumed that uncertainty would have been apparent at the time," he said.

The Labour backbencher Jeremy Corbyn, a fierce opponent of the war, described Mr Blair's shift in language as "ridiculous".

"Ten months ago, he told us that he was absolutely certain there were weapons of mass destruction. He's now saying ... they might not find them. This is ridiculous. We were taken to war on the basis there was a real threat."

The admission of doubt is particularly significant for Mr Blair because, unlike President George Bush, he put WMD, rather than regime change, at the centre of his justification for war.

Mr Blair must now brace himself for the Hutton report into the death of the Iraqi arms specialist Dr David Kelly, which is expected by the end of the month. Yesterday, he vowed he would not hide from any criticisms - a charge put by the Conservative leader, Michael Howard.

It would be absurd for him not to respond to the report on the day it was published, he said, though he refused to confirm he would lead the debate in the Commons a week later.

"I can assure you I have no intention of hiding away from this at all," he said. "On the contrary, I am enthusiastic about being at long last able to debate these issues on the basis of an objective, independent judgment by a judge, rather than speculation."




tubes
uranium
weapons-declaration
Blair admits weapons may never be found { January 12 2004 }
Blair admits wmds may never be found { July 6 2004 }
Blair decided regime change april 2002 despite rhetoric { May 2 2005 }
Blix accuses fabricating evidence { April 12 2003 }
Blix report doubts wmd { June 2 2003 }
British doctored wmd dossier { May 29 2003 }
Bush declines to back call for intelligence probe
Bush jokes about finding wmds
Bush says war worth it despite no wmds
Bush says weapons will be found
Chemical weapons plant created after invasion { August 14 2005 }
Children play with uranium tubes
Cia condemned for flawed intelligence
Cia operative asked to falsify wmd report { December 9 2004 }
Classified study doubts weapons in 2002
Documents concerning uranium came from italy { October 25 2005 }
Fbi says profit motivated italian uranium forgery
Germ trailer evidence rejected { June 7 2003 }
GWB_WMD_Memo [pdf]
Inspector reports iraq had no WMD
Iraq declared al samoud missiles { April 29 2003 }
Iraq destroyed wmd 1995
Iraq may have destroyed wmd { May 27 2003 }
Kay blames cia for no wmd
Kurds help find wmd lab { May 7 2003 }
Mccain picked for iraq intelligence probe
Might have to be planted
New inspections to plant weapons { April 8 2003 }
New reports on us planting wmds in iraq
No firm evidence banned weapons { April 7 2003 }
No reliable evidence of iraqi weapons { June 6 2003 }
No reliable information wmd { June 6 2003 }
No weapons found in iraq says report
No wmd found but { February 14 2003 }
No wmds found in iraq { September 24 2003 }
Nuclear program materials still buried { June 26 2003 }
Officer refused falsify wmd reports
Panel assails CIA for failure on iraq weapons { March 29 2005 }
Powell says new data may have affected war decision { February 3 2004 }
Powell says wmd stocks wont be found
Powell says wmd un speech blot on record
Presidential report is critical of intelligence agencies
Questions on blair intelligence { April 21 2003 }
Report says intel on wmd was dead wrong { March 31 2005 }
Rockefeller says weapons should been found { May 29 2003 }
Saddam had no weapons in 2003 { October 6 2004 }
Saddam says wmd excuse for war
Scientist says arms kept till war { April 21 2003 }
Scientist surrenders says no wmd
Search for wmds in iraq ended last month { January 12 2005 }
Sen Durbin jan 26 06 on iraq wmds [mp3]
Sen Durbin jan 26 06 on iraq wmds
Senate panel blames bad iraq intelligence on CIA
Senators told iraqi weapons could hit east coast
Seniors sources ruled out finding wmds { July 10 2003 }
Skepticism on bushs weapons claims grow { May 22 2003 }
Smoking gun wmd site just pesticide
Task force unable find wmd { May 11 2003 }
Team hunting iraq WMD ends its search { January 12 2005 }
Test barrels nerve agent
Us adds teams hunt { April 27 2003 }
Us not inspected iraq nuclear facility { April 25 2003 }
US team concludes saddam had no wmd { April 26 2005 }
Us withdraws team of weapons hunters { January 8 2004 }
Usa and uk lied war pretext
Usa will falsify wmd
Weapons hunter quits says doubts they exist
Wmd intelligence was falisified { February 15 2004 }
Wmd proof [jpg]

Files Listed: 69



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple