News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinewar-on-terroriraqelection-jan-2005 — Viewing Item


Vietnam 1967 election turnout was good as well { February 1 2005 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1402922,00.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1402922,00.html

Comment
The Vietnam turnout was good as well

No amount of spin can conceal Iraqis' hostility to US occupation

Sami Ramadani
Tuesday February 1, 2005
The Guardian

On September 4 1967 the New York Times published an upbeat story on presidential elections held by the South Vietnamese puppet regime at the height of the Vietnam war. Under the heading "US encouraged by Vietnam vote: Officials cite 83% turnout despite Vietcong terror", the paper reported that the Americans had been "surprised and heartened" by the size of the turnout "despite a Vietcong terrorist campaign to disrupt the voting". A successful election, it went on, "has long been seen as the keystone in President Johnson's policy of encouraging the growth of constitutional processes in South Vietnam". The echoes of this weekend's propaganda about Iraq's elections are so close as to be uncanny.
With the past few days' avalanche of spin, you could be forgiven for thinking that on January 30 2005 the US-led occupation of Iraq ended and the people won their freedom and democratic rights. This has been a multi-layered campaign, reminiscent of the pre-war WMD frenzy and fantasies about the flowers Iraqis were collecting to throw at the invasion forces. How you could square the words democracy, free and fair with the brutal reality of occupation, martial law, a US-appointed election commission and secret candidates has rarely been allowed to get in the way of the hype.

If truth is the first casualty of war, reliable numbers must be the first casualty of an occupation-controlled election. The second layer of spin has been designed to convince us that an overwhelming majority of Iraqis participated. The initial claim of 72% having voted was quickly downgraded to 57% of those registered to vote. So what percentage of the adult population is registered to vote? The Iraqi ambassador in London was unable to enlighten me. In fact, as UN sources confirm, there has been no registration or published list of electors - all we are told is that about 14 million people were entitled to vote.

As for Iraqis abroad, the up to 4 million strong exiled community (with perhaps a little over 2 million entitled to vote) produced a 280,000 registration figure. Of those, 265,000 actually voted.

The Iraqi south, more religious than Baghdad, responded positively to Grand Ayatollah al-Sistani's position: to call the bluff of the US and vote for a list that was proclaimed to be hostile to the occupation. Sistani's supporters declared that voting on Sunday was the first step to kicking out the occupiers. The months ahead will put these declarations to a severe test. Meanwhile Moqtada al-Sadr's popular movement, which rejected the elections as a sham, is likely to make a comeback in its open resistance to the occupation.

The big vote in Kurdistan primarily reflects the Kurdish people's demand for national self-determination. The US administration has hitherto clamped down on these pressures. Henry Kissinger's recent proposal to divide Iraq into three states reflects a major shift among influential figures in the US who, led by Kissinger as secretary of state, ditched the Kurds in the 70s and brokered a deal between Saddam and the Shah of Iran.

George Bush and Tony Blair made heroic speeches on Sunday implying that Iraqis had voted to approve the occupation. Those who insist that the US is desperate for an exit strategy are misreading its intentions. The facts on the ground, including the construction of massive military bases in Iraq, indicate that the US is digging in to install and back a long-term puppet regime. For this reason, the US-led presence will continue, with all that entails in terms of bloodshed and destruction.

In the run-up to the poll, much of the western media presented it as a high-noon shootout between the terrorist Zarqawi and the Iraqi people, with the occupation forces doing their best to enable the people to defeat the fiendish, one-legged Jordanian murderer. In reality, Zarqawi-style sectarian violence is not only condemned by Iraqis across the political spectrum, including supporters of the resistance, but is widely seen as having had a blind eye turned to it by the occupation authorities. Such attitudes are dismissed by outsiders, but the record of John Negroponte, the US ambassador in Baghdad, of backing terror gangs in central America in the 80s has fuelled these fears, as has Seymour Hirsh's reports on the Pentagon's assassination squads and enthusiasm for the "Salvador option".

An honest analysis of the social and political map of Iraq reveals that Iraqis are increasingly united in their determination to end the occupation. Whether they participated in or boycotted Sunday's exercise, this political bond will soon reassert itself - just as it did in Vietnam - despite tactical differences, and despite the US-led occupation's attempts to dominate Iraqis by inflaming sectarian and ethnic divisions.

· Sami Ramadani was a political refugee from Saddam Hussein's regime and is a senior lecturer at London Metropolitan University




280 thousand iraqi exiles to vote absentee { January 27 2005 }
30cnd iraq.2 [jpg]
An israeli rediscovers his iraqi roots { January 30 2005 }
Baghdad voting linked to food rations
Behind the scenes aid to candidates { July 17 2005 }
Blair hails iraqi election as blow to global terrorism
Cia sought to influence elections
Confusion surrounds iraq poll turnout { January 30 2005 }
Election complaints emerge in iraq
Gorbachev calls iraqi elections fake { February 1 2005 }
Gunmen kill three iraqi candidates
Insurgents vowing to kill iraqis who brave the polls { January 26 2005 }
Iraq kurdish president calls shiite pm to step down
Iraq shuts down to vote
Iraq suffers bloody day of assassinations and recounts { February 9 2005 }
Iraqi expats in chicago are skeptical
Iraqi kurds vote in droves
Iraqi kurds warns shiite prime minister
Iraqi parliament set to name kurd as new president
Iraqi press under attack from iraq authorities { May 2 2005 }
Iraqi vote shows shiite party leading { February 3 2005 }
Iraqis around the world register for homeland vote { January 24 2005 }
Iraqis brave bombs to vote in their millions
Iraqis danced with joy as they voted sunday
Iraqis report complaints about election irregularities { February 2 2005 }
Kurd is named iraqs president as tensions boil { April 7 2005 }
New iraqi government takes office { May 4 2005 }
On baghdads closed streets a party atmosphere during vote { January 30 2005 }
Poll workers in sunni areas scared off { January 31 2005 }
Procedures for voting in iraqi election { January 22 2005 }
Shia and kurdish voters flocked to polling stations { January 30 2005 }
Shiite cleric sadr doesnt call for election boycott { January 24 2005 }
Skeptics question worth of iraq election { January 28 2005 }
Split vercict in iraq vote sets stage for weak government { February 14 2005 }
Sunni polling stations never opened
Sunnis will vote if US troops leave
Top iraqi candidates wont press for US withdrawal
US avoids politcal fight among iraqis { March 31 2005 }
US funded programs nurture voting process { January 26 2005 }
US says no influence on elections { July 18 2005 }
US tried to influence iraq vote
US troops must stay until iraqis can defeat insurgency { January 26 2005 }
Vietnam 1967 election turnout was good as well { February 1 2005 }
Voting program targets expatriates { January 23 2005 }

Files Listed: 44



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple