News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinewar-on-terroriraqcolonize — Viewing Item


France russia germany want rebuilding role { April 4 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/04/international/worldspecial/04CND-FRANCE.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/04/international/worldspecial/04CND-FRANCE.html

April 4, 2003
France, Russia and Germany Want Role in Rebuilding Iraq
By JOHN TAGLIABUE


PARIS, April 4 — A day after the United States and its European allies agreed on significant international cooperation in rebuilding Iraq, France, Russia, and Germany sought today to stake out as extensive a United Nations role as possible in reconstructing the shattered country.

Meeting in Paris, the foreign ministers of the three countries called for the United Nations to be given an immediate role in dealing with an "emergency humanitarian situation" in Iraq. Their remarks underscored the gap that remains in detail over how broad the United Nations role should be.

Speaking one day after Secretary of States Colin L. Powell met with the foreign ministers of 23 European countries, the ministers also called for the earliest possible halt to the fighting in Iraq.

The Russian foreign minister, Igor S. Ivanov, who joined with France last month in thwarting a United Nations Security Council resolution authorizing the war, said today, "We must insist today on the earliest possible cessation of hostilities."

Addressing a joint news conference after their meeting, Mr. Ivanov said: "The earlier the war is finished the better it will be, including for the United States."

On Thursday, Mr. Powell said that the coalition led by Britain and the United States would play, at least initially, the leading role in Iraq, but that they were prepared to cooperate with the international community and most notably the United Nations.

The French foreign minister, Dominique de Villepin said it was "absolutely natural" that in the "security phase, the forces present on the ground have a specific responsibility."

Standing with Mr. Ivanov at the news conference, he added that, "there should be no discussion either on the principle or on the terms" of United Nations participation in Iraq.

"No country or countries can hope to win the war alone," he said. "Nobody can hope to build peace alone."

Britain's Prime Minister Tony Blair pledged today that a post-war Iraq would be run by Iraqis, not by British or American officials, and that British troops would not remain in Iraq any longer than necessary.

Mr. Blair has been treading a thin line between American insistence that its officials be able to deal with situations in postwar Iraq without having to obtain permission from an outside authority and the insistence of some European powers that the United Nations take on an organizing role as early possible.

Germany's foreign minister, Joschka Fischer, who sided with France in opposing a Security Council resolution for war, said there was a "very broad convergence of views on the central role of the United Nations."

There was considerable difference in tone from the last meeting the three ministers held in Paris on March 5. Then, France and Russia threatened to use their vetoes as permanent Security Council members to block any authorization of force in Iraq. Germany is a nonpermanent Council member.

Though some European governments have insisted on having some degree of influence on the shape of postwar Iraq, insisting for instance on the earliest possible involvement of Iraqis in a postwar government, Mr. Ivanov said it was "premature to talk of modalities after the war as long as the hostilities continue."

"Our efforts are aimed above all at ending the war and resolving the humanitarian problems," he said. Emphasizing that the Europeans sought a harmonious relationship with the United States, he said, "We address these words to our partners, with whom we are maintaining dialogue, since the end of the war can only profit everyone."

But Mr. De Villepin appeared to suggest that United Nations involvement should go even further than just humanitarian assistance. There should, he said, be assurances of the territorial integrity of postwar Iraq and the equitable distribution of reconstruction work on the basis of public tenders.

"The first emergency is humanitarian," he said. He added that, "every outlook for the future of Iraq should take into account the state of Iraq after the war."

Describing Iraq as a "country whose unity is fragile," he said that "in an open crisis of such importance the very principle of international legitimacy is a problem to which we are all attached and about which there can be no discussion."

Mr. De Villepin criticized the awarding of contracts to United States companies for the reconstruction of Iraq. French businessmen have grown increasingly nervous recently by the prospect that the United States, upset over French leadership in the effort to block the war, might punish French companies by boycotting their products or closing markets and contracts to the French.

"Iraq is not a cake or an El Dorado to be divided up," Mr. De Villepin said. "These initiatives do not take into consideration the world as it really is."



Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy



aristrocracy
banks-currency
corporations
military-presence
Annan seeks to internationalize efforts in iraq { May 2 2004 }
Bechtel awarded infrastructure contract { April 17 2003 }
Bechtel wins first contrat { April 18 2003 }
Billions of revenue from oil missing { June 28 2004 }
Blair says whole world will be involved { May 2004 }
Brits move from military to economic role in basra { November 2007 }
Bush considers un force in iraq
Bush gives canada iraq reconstruction contracts { January 13 2004 }
Bush says we risk lives we get contracts { December 11 2003 }
Bush wants NATO in iraq
Cash buys iraqi tribes { December 15 2002 }
Cfr suggests three state solution
Closure of iraq paper spurs opposition { April 3 2004 }
Company exploited blacks south africa { April 6 2003 }
Concerns over US transfer plan for iraq { May 25 2004 }
Control over iraq worldbank { October 20 2003 }
Delegates agree secret talks { April 29 2003 }
Democratic iraq { January 6 2003 }
Details on halliburton contract { April 11 2003 }
Dod statedep fight over iraq control { April 10 2003 }
Established central bank new currency { October 11 2003 }
Evangelicals plan to minister iraqis spiritual healing
Exiles plot { January 13 2003 }
Fears of postwar strife { March 11 2003 }
France germany oppose us plan { September 4 2003 }
France russia germany want rebuilding role { April 4 2003 }
France seeks big role
Full control rebuilding { February 21 2003 }
General preventing privitizing iraq fired { March 18 2004 }
Germany challenges us on nato iraq role
Germany france want more say { July 14 2003 }
Germany not offering troops
Halliburton makes killing { March 23 2003 }
Halliburton rebuilds iraq { March 26 2003 }
Imf worldbank rebuild iraq
Iraq run on dollars { April 18 2003 }
Iraq shifts from dollar to dinar { November 1 2005 }
Iraq tribes { January 5 2003 }
Iraqi candidate shell executive { April 2 2003 }
Iraqi gravy train { April 13 2003 }
Iraqi leader allawi worked for cia in 90s { June 9 2004 }
Iraqs first burger king { October 19 2003 }
Limit action by kurds { February 27 2003 }
Mcdonalds poised for iraq invasion
New administator arrives take over { May 12 2003 }
New army created for iraq { June 24 2003 }
New leader past { November 25 2002 }
New leaders protested no occupation { April 16 2003 }
New regime { September 22 2002 }
Northrop gets 48m deal train iraq army { June 30 2004 }
Occupation plan { October 11 2002 }
Oil wont finance reconstruction { October 5 2003 }
Paramilitary battalion us legitimising militias { December 4 2003 }
Pentagon 4 bases longterm { April 20 2003 }
Pentagon rebuilding with exiles
Pipeline to israel just rumor
Possibility pumping oil israel { August 25 2003 }
Pro israeli hawk to govern iraq { April 4 2003 }
Pro western dictator
Reagan treasury official run iraq { April 17 2003 }
Rebuild iraq kuwati trade fair reconstruction { January 19 2004 }
Regime change while fighting { April 6 2003 }
Rumsfeld resisting powell team { April 3 2003 }
Saddam replacement warcrimes { November 20 2002 }
Secret bids gop donors
Secret plan impose regime { April 1 2003 }
Setting up puppet government { April 15 2003 }
Un resolution welcomed by europe
Un secret blueprint postwar { March 5 2003 }
Us 51st state { May 4 2003 }
US and Britain ask United Nations to take iraq { May 24 2004 }
Us asks nato wider role { December 4 2003 }
Us asks un for wider role { September 2 2003 }
Us backed exiles reinvent nation { May 4 2003 }
Us blocks french german contracts
Us categorizes iraqis { February 26 2003 }
Us chooses saddams successor { February 4 2003 }
Us more ferocious than saddam
Us offer to report to un { September 4 2003 }
US paying iraqi press for favorable stories { November 30 2005 }
Us ready without un { March 25 2003 }
Us sets up trade bank in iraq { July 22 2003 }
Us shuts down iraqi newspaper
Us shuts out france germany for iraq work
US strategy should be to divide iraq
War chest for allies only { April 4 2003 }
World bank limits aid
Worldbank to rebuild

Files Listed: 88



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple