News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinewar-on-terroriraqcolonize — Viewing Item


France germany oppose us plan { September 4 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/04/international/worldspecial/04CND-REAC.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/04/international/worldspecial/04CND-REAC.html

September 4, 2003
France and Germany Oppose U.S. Plan for U.N. Role in Iraq
By RICHARD BERNSTEIN

BERLIN, Sept. 4 — The leaders of France and Germany, giving their first response to the Bush administration's turn to the United Nations for help in the occupation of Iraq, announced that their countries would not support an American draft of a Security Council resolution that would authorize both an expanded international force and financial help in Iraq.

Meeting in the German city of Dresden today, President Jacques Chirac of France and Chancellor Gerhard Schröder of Germany said the American proposal, circulated to the Security Council on Wednesday, did not go far enough in transferring political control of Iraq to the Iraqis or give the United Nations a strong enough role in the proposed international force.

"We are ready to examine the proposals, but they seem quite far from what appears to us the primary objective, namely the transfer of political responsibility to an Iraqi government as soon as possible," Mr. Chirac said in a joint news conference.

Mr. Schröder, who, like Mr. Chirac, strongly opposed military action in Iraq, said the Bush administration's turn to the United Nations had created new "movement" toward greater international coordination on Iraq. But he added, "I agree with my colleague Mr. Chirac when he says that the proposal does not go far enough and is also not dynamic."

The American draft proposal circulated to Security Council members on Wednesday has not been released, but copies of the text released to reporters indicate that it would essentially transform the United States-led occupation force into a United Nations force. But American officials have made clear that the force would remain under American command even as political authority in Iraq would continue to be vested in the American civilian administrator, L. Paul Bremer III.

The French and German statements today were clearly blows against the American effort to enlist United Nations support for the Iraqi occupation while retaining a dominant American role. But they seemed more a prod to the United States to give the United Nation greater authority than an outright rejection of the Bush administration's call for international help.

Mr. Schröder, for example, reiterated recent statements by German officials that they wanted the American effort to rebuild Iraq to succeed.

"We believe that despite of what we thought about the war and the way it was fought, it must now be our goal to create a perspective of stability and democracy for Iraq," Mr. Schröder said. "Such a perspective can only develop if the United Nations takes over responsibility for the political process and if an Iraqi administration is installed."

Mr. Chirac, referring to the American draft proposal, said, "We are naturally ready to study it in the most positive manner."

Speaking in Washington after Mr. Chirac's and Mr. Schröder's statements, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, said:

"I think the resolution is drafted in a way that deals with the concerns that leaders such as President Chirac and Chancellor Schröder have raised in the past, and if they have suggestions, we would be more than happy to listen to them."

Mr. Powell expressed puzzlement over the French and German demand that political responsibility be turned over to the Iraqis more quickly.

"I don't see from their statements that they said what exactly they are looking for or who they would turn it over to if we were turning it over right away," Mr. Powell said, referring to political authority in Iraq.

In many ways, the statements by Mr. Chirac and Mr. Schröder reprised the debate over Iraq that took place in the months leading to the American-led war to overthrow the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein, when both France and Germany demanding that the United Nations have the central role in any military action.

"Everybody wants the U.S. to succeed in Iraq," said Christoph Bertram, director of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. "There is no question about that. But there is also a deep conviction in France and Germany and capitals all over the E.U. that the U.S. government will not succeed in rebuilding Iraq without a much stronger involvement of the United Nations."

"I think Schröder's and Chirac's rejection of the U.S. draft for a new United Nations resolution on Iraq is very clear and not surprising at all," Mr. Bertram said. "They expect the U.S. to end the occupation in Iraq and to transfer the political responsibility to the U.N. and an Iraqi government as soon as possible."



Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company


aristrocracy
banks-currency
corporations
military-presence
Annan seeks to internationalize efforts in iraq { May 2 2004 }
Bechtel awarded infrastructure contract { April 17 2003 }
Bechtel wins first contrat { April 18 2003 }
Billions of revenue from oil missing { June 28 2004 }
Blair says whole world will be involved { May 2004 }
Brits move from military to economic role in basra { November 2007 }
Bush considers un force in iraq
Bush gives canada iraq reconstruction contracts { January 13 2004 }
Bush says we risk lives we get contracts { December 11 2003 }
Bush wants NATO in iraq
Cash buys iraqi tribes { December 15 2002 }
Cfr suggests three state solution
Closure of iraq paper spurs opposition { April 3 2004 }
Company exploited blacks south africa { April 6 2003 }
Concerns over US transfer plan for iraq { May 25 2004 }
Control over iraq worldbank { October 20 2003 }
Delegates agree secret talks { April 29 2003 }
Democratic iraq { January 6 2003 }
Details on halliburton contract { April 11 2003 }
Dod statedep fight over iraq control { April 10 2003 }
Established central bank new currency { October 11 2003 }
Evangelicals plan to minister iraqis spiritual healing
Exiles plot { January 13 2003 }
Fears of postwar strife { March 11 2003 }
France germany oppose us plan { September 4 2003 }
France russia germany want rebuilding role { April 4 2003 }
France seeks big role
Full control rebuilding { February 21 2003 }
General preventing privitizing iraq fired { March 18 2004 }
Germany challenges us on nato iraq role
Germany france want more say { July 14 2003 }
Germany not offering troops
Halliburton makes killing { March 23 2003 }
Halliburton rebuilds iraq { March 26 2003 }
Imf worldbank rebuild iraq
Iraq run on dollars { April 18 2003 }
Iraq shifts from dollar to dinar { November 1 2005 }
Iraq tribes { January 5 2003 }
Iraqi candidate shell executive { April 2 2003 }
Iraqi gravy train { April 13 2003 }
Iraqi leader allawi worked for cia in 90s { June 9 2004 }
Iraqs first burger king { October 19 2003 }
Limit action by kurds { February 27 2003 }
Mcdonalds poised for iraq invasion
New administator arrives take over { May 12 2003 }
New army created for iraq { June 24 2003 }
New leader past { November 25 2002 }
New leaders protested no occupation { April 16 2003 }
New regime { September 22 2002 }
Northrop gets 48m deal train iraq army { June 30 2004 }
Occupation plan { October 11 2002 }
Oil wont finance reconstruction { October 5 2003 }
Paramilitary battalion us legitimising militias { December 4 2003 }
Pentagon 4 bases longterm { April 20 2003 }
Pentagon rebuilding with exiles
Pipeline to israel just rumor
Possibility pumping oil israel { August 25 2003 }
Pro israeli hawk to govern iraq { April 4 2003 }
Pro western dictator
Reagan treasury official run iraq { April 17 2003 }
Rebuild iraq kuwati trade fair reconstruction { January 19 2004 }
Regime change while fighting { April 6 2003 }
Rumsfeld resisting powell team { April 3 2003 }
Saddam replacement warcrimes { November 20 2002 }
Secret bids gop donors
Secret plan impose regime { April 1 2003 }
Setting up puppet government { April 15 2003 }
Un resolution welcomed by europe
Un secret blueprint postwar { March 5 2003 }
Us 51st state { May 4 2003 }
US and Britain ask United Nations to take iraq { May 24 2004 }
Us asks nato wider role { December 4 2003 }
Us asks un for wider role { September 2 2003 }
Us backed exiles reinvent nation { May 4 2003 }
Us blocks french german contracts
Us categorizes iraqis { February 26 2003 }
Us chooses saddams successor { February 4 2003 }
Us more ferocious than saddam
Us offer to report to un { September 4 2003 }
US paying iraqi press for favorable stories { November 30 2005 }
Us ready without un { March 25 2003 }
Us sets up trade bank in iraq { July 22 2003 }
Us shuts down iraqi newspaper
Us shuts out france germany for iraq work
US strategy should be to divide iraq
War chest for allies only { April 4 2003 }
World bank limits aid
Worldbank to rebuild

Files Listed: 88



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple