NewsMine — security — legislation — dissent — senator-byrd — Viewing Item

Senator byrd delays security bill Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020918/ap_on_go_co/homeland_security_5 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20020918/ap_on_go_co/homeland_security_5 GOP Urges Action on Security Bill Tue Sep 17,10:49 PM ET By CURT ANDERSON, Associated Press Writer The White House and senior Republicans expressed frustration Tuesday at the slow pace of Senate debate on the homeland security bill, which has been tied up for days by 84-year-old Democrat Robert Byrd of West Virginia — a powerful committee chairman few want to cross. "I fear the Senate Democrats are fiddling while Rome has the potential to burn," said Senate GOP leader Trent Lott of Mississippi. "It's being talked to death," added White House spokesman Ari Fleischer ( news - web sites). Byrd, the Senate Appropriations Committee chairman and self-appointed guardian of congressional prerogatives, has talked for hours over three days on the Senate floor about the need for careful, deliberate examination of President Bush ( news - web sites)'s proposal to merge 22 federal agencies into a massive, 170,000-employee Homeland Security Department. "Congress must never act recklessly," said Byrd, the silver-haired senator whose committee oversees all federal spending. "My concerns are based in the Constitution." As Byrd continued to speak Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle insisted Democrats are not stalling. Daschle offered a motion that would cut off debate on the Democratic version of the homeland security bill, provided at least 60 of the 100 senators agree when the matter comes to a vote Thursday. "Let me simply say to the president or anybody else who has questions, there is no desire to slow this legislation down," said Daschle, D-S.D. "We've got to move the bill along." A few hours later, the Senate approved by voice vote an amendment by Sen. Fred Thompson ( news, bio, voting record), R-Tenn., that removes from the Democratic bill a powerful new White House anti-terrorism office that Bush viewed as an unwarranted congressional intrusion. Byrd's talkathon was aimed in part at preventing that amendment from gaining a final vote last week. Yet Republicans were unlikely to agree to halt debate, because the Democratic bill does not give Bush the broad employee management powers he insists are crucial in the new agency to meet nimble, emerging terrorist threats. Democrats and their labor union allies contend that Bush wants to gut hard-won civil service and union protections. Bush, who has threatened to veto the bill without the employee powers, said at a fund-raiser in Nashville, Tenn., that opponents are "more interested in Washington special interests than they are in protecting the interests of the American people." Daschle, however, said Democrats would not back down. "This is basically a question of accountability and ensuring that we never go back to the politicization of the federal work force that we saw in the bad old days," Daschle said. "No one can argue that homeland security requires the elimination of those protections." There were efforts to bridge the gap on worker rights. One proposal being floated by Sens. Zell Miller, D-Ga., and Phil Gramm, R-Texas, would give the president more limited management flexibility over civil service employees and would place some restrictions on the president's ability to waive union protections for reasons of national security. Two moderate Democrats, John Breaux of Louisiana and Ben Nelson of Nebraska, have circulated a proposal that would give union members appeal rights if the president invokes the national security waiver, but Republicans are opposed. Sen. Joseph Lieberman ( news, bio, voting record), chief sponsor of the Democratic bill, said the White House must show some willingness to compromise on the worker issues if the overall measure is to pass. "The rest of us have moved in a spirit of wanting to get this bill done, but still protecting the rights of federal employees. And I wish there'd be a little bit of movement on the White House part," said Lieberman, D-Conn. Bush, however, left little doubt about his position. "I will not accept a lousy bill," he said. ____ On the Net: Congress: http://thomas.loc.gov

Byrd attacks homeland security bill { November 20 2002 } Byrd calls reckless administration { February 12 2003 } Byrd compares GOP to nazis Sen byrd has reality show idea { July 26 2003 } Sen byrd truth will emerge { June 9 2003 } Senator byrd delays security bill Files Listed: 6

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.